This Week in the News

US No Longer Reliable Ally 

Politico wrote on December 21: 

“Trump continues to antagonize the United States’ traditional European allies, deriding them… as ‘weak’ and a ‘decaying group of nations’… 

“Like many other European nations, France sees Russia has a growing threat to the continent. So it is preparing to defend itself against… a ‘violent test’ from Russia in the next three to four years that it would need to counter without much, if any, help from Washington… 

“The challenge is even higher as it’s becoming increasingly clear they can no longer rely on the United States as a primary security provider. Successive U.S. presidents — including Barack Obama and Joe Biden — have warned over the past decade that Washington would eventually have to focus on the Indo-Pacific region instead of Europe, but the Trump administration has already matched those words with action

“That is putting the spotlight on France, the EU’s only nuclear power and a country with independent weapons makers that has long warned the continent should become more autonomous in areas such as technology and defense… the way France and Germany, the EU’s largest countries, respond in the coming months and years will determine whether other European countries will turn to them for Europe’s defense or try to retain bilateral ties with Washington at the expense of EU and NATO unity… 

France’s distrust of America dates back to 1956, when U.S. President Dwight Eisenhower forced it and Britain to back down from a military intervention to regain control of the Suez Canal from Egypt, leaving Paris feeling betrayed and humiliated. Since then,… France’s defense policy has been based on the assumption that the U.S. is not a reliable ally and that the Western European nation should be able to defend itself on its own if need be. The memory of the Suez incident contributed to former French President Charles de Gaulle’s decision to leave NATO and develop its own nuclear program. 

“Now, European capitals… are starting to increasingly realize France might have been right all along… Since Trump came back to power in January, the clues of Washington’s disengagement from — if not disdain of — Europe have been hard to ignore… Less than one year after Trump returned to the White House, influential German voices… are no longer looking at Washington as an ally… 

“The French president said France’s military expenditures will increase by €6.7 billion next year, bringing the country’s total defense spending to more than €57.1 billion. In comparison, German lawmakers this week greenlit €50 billion in weaponry procurement — Germany’s military expenditures are expected to reach more than €82 billion next year…” 

It’s all in line with biblical prophecy for the USA and Europe. 

Rubio Warns Europe Risks Destroying ‘Shared Culture’ of Western Civilization

Breitbart wrote on December 20: 

“Secretary of State Marco Rubio has warned that Europe risks destroying the ‘shared culture’ of the West and in turn weaken bonds with the United States… Rubio doubled down on the assertions made in the White House’s National Security Strategy memo, which declared that Europe faces ‘civilizational erasure’ if it continues globalist policies of mass migration and attacks on fundamental liberties such as freedom of speech. 

“The memo has riled feathers in Europe, with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz saying that many aspects of the document were ‘unacceptable to us from a European perspective.’ Meanwhile, the… head of the European Commission… Ursula von der Leyen demanded that the United States not ‘interfere’ in European democracy… 

“Rubio specifically pointed to the problems surrounding mass migration, citing the recent Islamist terror attack at a Jewish Hanukkah celebration on Bondi Beach in Australia as an example. ‘Mass migration over the last decade has been highly disruptive, not just to the United States but also to continental Europe and in some cases in the Indo-Pacific as well. So I just think this is a real challenge that multiple Western advanced, industrialized countries are facing…” 

“Row Over ‘Censorship’ Escalates” 

The Guardian wrote on December 24: 

“The French president… and the European Union have accused Washington of ‘coercion and intimidation’, after the US imposed a visa ban on five prominent European figures who have been at heart of the campaign to introduce laws regulating American tech giants. The visa bans were imposed on Tuesday on [French] Thierry Breton, a former EU commissioner and one of the architects of the bloc’s Digital Services Act (DSA), and four anti-disinformation campaigners, including two in Germany and two in the UK… 

“Justifying the visa bans, the US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, wrote on X: ‘For far too long, ideologues in Europe have led organised efforts to coerce American platforms to punish American viewpoints they oppose. The Trump administration will no longer tolerate these egregious acts of extraterritorial censorship.’… the row threatens to become part of a far wider existing cultural and political conflict between Donald Trump’s administration and Europe… 

“Macron condemned the visa ban in furious terms… Breton, a former French finance minister and the European commissioner for the internal market from 2019 to 2024, said: ‘Is McCarthy’s witch-hunt back?…’ 

“A European Commission spokesperson said: ‘If needed, we will respond swiftly and decisively to defend our regulatory autonomy against unjustified measures’… 

“Germany’s justice ministry said the two German campaigners had the government’s ‘support and solidarity’ and the visa bans were unacceptable… 

“Raphaël Glucksmann, a French socialist MEP, said in a message to Rubio: ‘For far too long, Europe has been weak in implementing its own laws and defending its own interests. You have chosen to cosy up tyrants and confront democracies. The time has come for us to stand up. Kneel as much as you want in front of Putin, we are the free world now. We are not a colony of the United StatesWe are Europeans, we must defend our laws, our principles, our interests. This scandalous sanction against Thierry Breton pays tribute to his fight for our sovereignty. We will continue it together. To the end.’… 

“Michel Duclos, a former senior French diplomat [said:]… ‘Europe is becoming the new Russia for Washington. It brings to mind the 1920s – America favouring the former enemy [Germany) against its former allies – but worse.’ 

“The chair of the German Journalists’ Association, Mika Beuster, [said:] ‘This is censorship in its purest form, the likes of which we have previously only known from autocratic regimes’…” 

Politico added on December 24: 

“The sanctions, announced Tuesday, also revoke the U.S. visas of British citizens Imran Ahmed and Clare Melford…  Ahmed, who currently lives in Washington, faces immediate deportation… 

“The move is the latest in a series of warning shots volleyed by the U.S. at allies over what it views as unfair efforts to regulate American social media and tech giants, including Elon Musk-owned X, which was slapped with a Euro 120 million fine earlier this month for violating the bloc’s content moderation law….” 

US Military Presence in Europe Throughout 2026 

Caliber wrote on December 20: 

“US President Donald Trump has signed into law legislation that sets a minimum level of 76,000 American troops in Europe throughout 2026… Under the law, the number of US service members stationed on the continent may not fall below that threshold for more than 45 days… 

“According to the Pentagon, approximately 100,000 US troops are currently deployed in Europe, including more than 65,000 permanently stationed personnel, with the remainder serving on rotational deployments… The law also provides for: $400 million in funding for arms procurement for Ukraine; Financing for the Golden Dome missile defence shield initiated by Trump; A US defence budget of approximately $900 billion for the next fiscal year, $8 billion higher than the administration’s previous proposal.” 

Denmark Fumes Over New US Envoy to Greenland

Deutsche Welle wrote on December 22: 

“Denmark is incensed at the appointment of Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry as new US special envoy to Greenland as President Donald Trump continues to heap pressure on the Nordic nation and looks to take over the autonomous territory from Copenhagen. 

“In appointing Landry on Sunday, Trump — who has threatened to take Greenland by force from ally Denmark if necessary — wrote that the southern governor, ‘understands how essential Greenland is to our National Security, and will strongly advance our Country’s Interests for the Safety, Security, and Survival of our Allies, and indeed, the World.’ 

“Landry took to the social media platform X to thank Trump for the appointment, writing, ‘It’s an honor to serve you in this volunteer position to make Greenland a part of the US.’ 

On Monday, Danish Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen said the move left him ‘deeply angered’ and said Washington must respect Denmark’s sovereignty, with Copenhagen vowing to summon the US ambassador in protest… Rasmussen told Denmark’s TV 2 that he was ‘particularly upset by his [Landry’s] statements,’ calling them ‘completely unacceptable,’ and adding to the Reuters news agency: ‘We insist that everyone — including the US — must show respect for the territorial integrity of the Kingdom of Denmark.’ 

“Greenland Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen said news of the appointment, ‘might sound like a big deal,’ but added that it ‘doesn’t change anything for us here at home. We will determine our future ourselves,’ he said. In a joint statement with Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen, Nielsen added: ‘Greenland belongs to the Greenlanders and the US shall not take over Greenland.’… 

“Trump, who floated the option of buying Greenland and established a new consulate there during his first term, has repeatedly threatened to get it no matter what since returning to office in January 2025. He has sought to emphasize Greenland’s location and mineral riches as key to US national security and has ignored the wishes of Greenlanders and Danish leaders in his pursuit…” 

Interest-Free Loan for Ukraine 

Times of Oman wrote on December 19: 

“German Chancellor Friedrich Merz called the European Council’s decision to grant Ukraine a €90 billion loan a ‘decisive message for an end to the war.’ 

“The interest-free loan is enough to cover Ukraine’s military and budgetary needs for the next two years, he pointed out in a statement. And Russian President Vladimir Putin ‘will only make concessions once he realizes his war will not pay off,’ Merz said. ‘If Russia does not pay reparations we will — in full accordance with international law — make use of Russian immobilized assets for paying back the loan,’ Merz added. 

“Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban criticized the EU’s decision on the €90 billion loan to Ukraine. ‘It’s lost money,’ said Orban, who is seen as one of Russia’s closest allies in Europe. ‘The good news is that we’re staying out,’ he said. 

“Hungary, along with Slovakia and the Czech Republic, were given an exemption from the loan commitment to avoid them blocking the decision.” 

How giving a loan to Ukraine to enable it to keep on fighting will guarantee that the war will end is an unexplained mystery. 

Peaceful Russia? 

Tulsi Gabbard, US Director of National Intelligence, wrote on December 21  wrote on X: 

“Deep State warmongers and their Propaganda Media are again trying to undermine President Trump’s efforts to bring peace to Ukraine—and indeed Europe—by falsely claiming that the ‘U.S. intelligence community’ agrees to and supports EU/NATO viewpoint that Russia’s aim is to invade/conquer Europe (in order to gin up support for their pro-war policies). The truth is that ‘US intelligence’ assesses that Russia does not even have the capability to conquer and occupy Ukraine…” 

Maybe not now, but it WILL occur later. 

Russia Scraps Military Pacts With Europe 

TRT World wrote on December 20: 

“The Russian government on Saturday officially authorised the Defence Ministry to terminate a series of bilateral military cooperation agreements signed with several European nations between 1992 and 2002. 

“The termination list includes agreements with Germany, Poland, and Norway, as well as similar pacts with Bulgaria, Romania, Denmark, the UK, the Netherlands, Croatia, Belgium and the Czech Republic.” 

“US Intelligence Chief Calls Reuters Report on Putin’s War Aims a ‘Lie'” 

MDR reported on December 21: 

“The Director of National Intelligence of the United States, Tulsi Gabbard, has rejected a Reuters report claiming that US intelligence agencies believed Russian President Vladimir Putin intended to conquer all of Ukraine. 

“Gabbard wrote on X that this was ‘a lie and propaganda.’  She claimed Reuters was ‘willingly serving warmongers’ who are undermining US President Donald Trump’s peace efforts to end the war in Ukraine. The truth, she said, is that US intelligence assesses that Russia wants to avoid a larger war with NATO…”

This is more than questionable. 

“Painful Truths” 

Die Welt wrote on December 19: 

“Ukraine will lose the war against Russia – Europeans must admit this, even if it hurts…” 

Trump on the Run 

t-online wrote on December 18: 

“Donald Trump’s annual address revealed a US president on the run – not only from the facts and from his own responsibility. At an unusually early stage, he finds himself confronted with a loss of power… But instead of spreading credible optimism in his prime-time address, Trump’s appearance once again primarily devolved into a personal settling of scores with his political opponents and a strategic concealment of his own failures… 

“Trump is finding it increasingly difficult to mask his plummeting approval ratings. These are now the worst of his two terms in office. The same applies to the growing tensions within his own party ahead of the difficult midterm elections for the Republicans next year. The signs that Trump is already governing like a ‘lame duck’ after only the first eleven months are multiplying. This is unusually early for a president in his second term.” 

“With all the lies and omissions in his year-end address, Trump appeared noticeably rushed, nervous, even almost slightly panicked.  That, at least, is how numerous people from his own political camp commented on the performance.  Perhaps this was a man quickly reading a defense speech from a teleprompter before the electorate delivers its verdict on him in the midterm elections. This was a president who is already on the run.” 

“A Battered America” 

The Ron Paul Institute wrote on December 19: 

”President Donald Trump’s end of year speech to the American public that took place on December 17th was full of conceits over how the United States under the new regime in power is moving ahead on all fronts to benefit the American people. The reality is somewhat different with a struggling economy, inflation and growing unemployment as well as wars and rumors of wars. The only economic sector that appears to be doing just fine is the ‘military industrial complex’… For sure, the warfare bill is helping to expand the nation’s debt while providing little in the way of national security due to profound ignorance combined with serial blundering by those in power in and around the White House. 

“The unavoidable fact that Trump has created a mess nearly everywhere that he has trod has been visible practically since inauguration day eleven months ago, made worse by the incoherent and frequently contradictory explanations coming out of the Oval Office itself… 

“Regarding Russia and Ukraine, Trump’s fumbling negotiating team consisting of two property developers Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner…  consistently fail to appreciate what Russia’s redlines are… 

“All of which leads us to Israel… Early in December, the US Embassy in Jerusalem co-sponsored with the Israeli government a gathering of 1,000 evangelical pastors from the United States… The trip to Israel was paid for by the Israeli government according to reports… 

“Fox News host arch Israel Firster Mark Levin hailed President Donald Trump as ‘the first Jewish president’ during the [White House Hanukkah Party] on Tuesday… Interestingly, Levin aside, it has been plausibly asserted that Trump is indeed the first Jewish president, having converted in 2017… 

“Also at the Tuesday reception, Israeli Las Vegas casino magnate and top political donor Miriam Adelson publicly and openly declared that Trump could pursue a third term as president… She also pledged an additional $250 million in campaign support to fund such an initiative, prompting audience chants of ‘Four more years.’ Trump praised Adelson’s backing… 

“Trump just appointed Rabbi Yehuda Kaploun… as head of the office of the State Department Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Antisemitism where he will have the rank of Ambassador. Kaploun pledged… to work with social networks to curb the spread of antisemitic falsehoods online.” 

Interesting facts and comments in light of our belief that God has set aside Trump to build or help build the Third Temple in Jerusalem. 

Incompetent FBI 

The New York Post wrote on December 21: 

“[The] FBI was warned that Jeffrey Epstein was into child porn — but ignored it for 10 years… A former employee of late sex predator Jeffrey Epstein alerted the FBI that he was interested in ‘child pornography’ and that he threatened to ‘burn her house down’ decades before Epstein became an international fixation — but feds apparently did nothing. Maria Farmer, whom Epstein hired to help purchase art, filed a complaint against him on Sept. 3, 1996… 

“‘I’ve waited 30 years,’ Farmer told The New York Times when asked about a recently released report showing her complaint… ‘They should be ashamed,’ she continued. ‘…They harmed all of these little girls. That part devastates me.’ 

“Farmer has publicly claimed for years that she tried to inform the authorities about Epstein and his madam, Ghislaine Maxwell’s, predatory behavior. Until the latest batch of Epstein files was released on Friday, the FBI didn’t publicly confirm that she had filed that complaint, and Farmer faced accusations from some that she fabricated her story about going to the feds… 

“Critics… accused the Trump administration of failing to comply with the law by not releasing all the documents by Friday. Detractors also railed against the level of redactions in the Epstein files released.” 

Allegedly, many photos showing Trump were redacted. 

What’s the Point?

International Business Times wrote on December 20:

“The long-awaited disclosure of the Jeffrey Epstein investigative files has arrived, but the resulting digital fallout suggests the public feels more deceived than informed. Instead of the transparency many had campaigned for, the release has sparked a firestorm of criticism over the heavy-handed use of the literal black pen.

“Over a hundred pages from the Epstein files are redacted, leading many to wonder ‘what was the point’ of releasing them in the first place… Public reaction turned swift and vitriolic as users began scouring the digital archives. The social media account UTOPIC reported that the files released are ‘apparently 90 percent redacted.’”

Trump’s “Absurd” National Security Threat Allegations 

The Daily Beast wrote on December 23: 

“It is unclear what prompted the president’s latest deranged rant. Donald Trump has accused The New York Times of being a [serious] national security threat in an unhinged Truth Social post… 

“Last week, the paper… published a detailed report examining Trump’s friendship with the late pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, describing how the two ‘pursued women in a game of ego and dominance’ in which ‘female bodies were currency.’ In one particularly damaging section, a mother who accompanied her 14-year-old daughter to a party at Mar-a-Lago with other young models claimed she was warned by Trump’s then-wife, Marla Maples: ‘Whatever you do, do not let her around any of these men, and especially my husband.’ Maples denied making the remark to the Times… 

“The president ranted about the outlet while continuing to push a dubious claim that he had lowered the cost of prescription drugs by the mathematically impossible amount of up to ‘3,000 percent.’… 

“In response to the Truth Social attack, a spokesperson for the Times told the Daily Beast: ‘Our job is to report fully and fairly on the government, no matter which party is in power. That includes reporting things that officials would prefer to hide from the American people. We won’t be deterred from this responsibility by threats and bluster, from the president or anyone else.’” 

Even though Trump has been railing against the New York Times, calling it fake news, the truth is that it is widely considered a highly respected, leading news outlet and America’s newspaper of record, recognized globally for its extensive investigative and international journalism, numerous Pulitzer Prizes [more than any other news organization] and large digital readership [millions of subscribers and leading the industry]. 

Hegseth’s Accusations 

The Independent wrote on December 18: 

“Many Americans are ‘too dumb’ or ‘too fat’ to serve in the military, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told a gathering of top recruiters at the Pentagon on Thursday,…  ‘not dumb, that’s wrong. You know, we’re just not educating them properly or they’ve got criminal records, or ADHD [Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder], or all these other things.’… 

“Hegseth has made a point of focusing on physical fitness throughout his time as secretary… and railing against ‘fat generals’…” 

The War Machine 

On December 22, Ron Paul wrote in his weekly column of the Ron Paul Institute: 

“Late last week, Congress passed and President Trump signed the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). The bill marks the first time the US military budget officially passed the one trillion dollar mark

“Of course, when you add in other military-related spending such as interest on the debt, veterans’ affairs, and military components of other government agencies, the true number is at least one and a half times that amount… Congress is so addicted to military spending that they appropriated even more money than President Trump requested…” 

This incredible waste of money for all the wrong reasons and ungodly projects is appalling. When David numbered his army, he was severely punished by God. 

Tucker Carlson Inflames Raging Battle for MAGA’s Future 

The Washington Post wrote on December 20: 

“Tucker Carlson had some concerns. So he called President Donald Trump. The right-wing podcaster and provocateur wanted to understand why the U.S. was attacking alleged drug smuggling boats off the coast of Venezuela and he warned against pursuing regime change there — a prospect that has alarmed the more isolationist ‘America First’ Republicans in Trump’s movement. 

“The conversations last weekend… show how the Fox News castoff is at the center of some of the most heated disputes in MAGA — over foreign policy, antisemitism and conspiracy theories, among other topics heightening tensions in the movement… Carlson is a divisive and influential figure with an audience — on social media, among MAGA commentators and inside the White House… as a growing number of MAGA activists clash with Trump and each other, clouding the future of the movement, Carlson has become a more central figure this year, viewed as consequential by detractors and supporters alike. 

“… Carlson is trying to push the party away from foreign intervention and divorce it from Israel, which he argues exerts burdensome pressure on U.S. foreign policy, drawing accusations that he is repeating antisemitic tropes. He has entertained conspiracy theories about the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk that have angered many MAGA influencers, including Kirk’s widow, Erika Kirk. And this fall, he interviewed white supremacist commentator Nick Fuentes, who has espoused antisemitic conspiracy theories… 

“Carlson vehemently rejects accusations of antisemitism. ‘Just because I don’t want to bow to the will of a foreign leader does not make me an antisemite, okay?’ he said. ‘I think antisemitism is immoral and I am against it.’… 

“To Carlson’s fans, he’s a champion of the populist ‘America First’ agenda they see as the future of the GOP… But others see Carlson as a threat to the conservative movement, elevating extreme ideas that the GOP has a responsibility to condemn — or at least not magnify… 

“Carlson spent years as a conservative commentator on CNN and MSNBC before landing at Fox News, where he rose… to the network’s most popular star… Carlson’s departure from Fox threatened to dramatically reduce his visibility in the party. Instead, freed from corporate constraints, he has rebuilt a large audience… 

“Over the summer, Carlson criticized the Trump administration’s bombing of Iran, prompting Trump to call him ‘kooky’… This past week, Carlson said he heard Trump was about to announce a war with Venezuela in a national address — and turned out to be incorrect. 

“But the two have also kept open lines of communication and praised each other…” 

Israel Surrounded by Enemies 

Israel Today wrote on December 19: 

“Israel is committed to the long-term demilitarization of the Gaza Strip and, if necessary, by force. That message was made unmistakably clear by Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar in an interview with Al Arabiya English, the Saudi outlet. If Hamas refuses to disarm as outlined in the US peace plan…, ‘Israel will have to deal with the problem,’ Sa’ar said… Senior Hamas leaders have stated publicly they have no intention of laying down their arms… If the threat continues, Israel cannot ignore it. That assessment is shared by Israel’s national security community, which has long argued that ceasefires without disarmament are merely pauses before the next escalation.

“Beyond Gaza, Sa’ar also addressed Israel’s northern borders. In Syria, he noted, the new regime in Damascus has recently hardened its position, delaying progress toward a potential security agreement… the facts on the ground remain deeply concerning. Syria is home to numerous militias, including extremist factions, some of which have committed atrocities against Alawite and Druze communities in recent months. Israel’s first priority, he said, remains the security of its own borders. 

Lebanon, too, remains a major destabilizing factor. Hezbollah continues to undermine state sovereignty by refusing to comply with the Lebanese government’s call to disarm. Sa’ar made it clear that disarming the Shiite militia would not only strengthen Israel’s security—it would also help Lebanon free itself from foreign interference. The implication was obvious: Iran, which has armed and financed Hezbollah for years.” 

Trump’s Contempt for Logic 

The Jerusalem Post wrote on December 22: 

“… regarding an American president now endowed with near-total decisional authority over nuclear weapons, a… fundamental concern should be Trump’s evident incapacity for logic-based reasoning. Though often minimized, underestimated, or overlooked, this conspicuous deficit could lead… to wholly unprecedented military conflicts…  each day’s news is replete with well-founded condemnations of Trump’s logical failings, historical inaccuracies, and contrived conclusions… 

“… it’s high time for Americans to worry not only about their current president’s transgressions, but also his intellectual debilities. At some not yet determinable point, the American president’s shortfalls of logic-based reasoning could bring us to the brink of a nuclear war.” 

Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s Coming Demise

Andrew Neil wrote on December 20 in Daily Mail:

“The more Keir Starmer’s popularity plummets, the more he tries to shield himself from public scrutiny and the judgement of voters who’ve come not just to dislike him but, in many cases, to detest him.

“So local elections he knows Labour is going to lose are cancelled. Access for journalists trying to hold him and his government to account is curtailed. Opinions on race, gender and immigration which do not conform to his government’s liberal-left worldview are rigorously policed — and miscreants often penalised.

“No opportunity is missed for him to escape these shores even on the flimsiest of globetrotting excuses — making it all the easier for him to avoid proper interrogation on the disasters regularly unfolding back on the home front.

“The Prime Minister thinks all this will restore his tarnished reputation and eventually make him electable again. It is a sign of just how out of touch he is that he doesn’t realise they merely underwrite his one-way ticket to the knacker’s yard, which is printed out and ready to be issued before 2026 is over.” 

“They Are Immigrating to Germany—and Behaving Like Conquerors or Colonialists.” 

Die Welt wrote on December 21: 

“They believe they are at war: Islamists are immigrating to Western countries like conquerors, considering their culture inferior.  Regardless of the number of victims of attacks or rapes, German politicians are not confronting the problem.”

Merz’s Most Powerful Opponent? 

ntv wrote on December 19: 

“Russia’s appetite for war is meeting with little resistance, certainly not in Washington, Beijing, or New Delhi. Only Europe and a few allies outside the continent are standing up to Putin. At their head is Chancellor Merz, who is playing for high stakes to achieve even the bare minimum… In recent days, Friedrich Merz has thrown the full political weight of the Federal Republic of Germany into the balance to prevent the year from ending in a complete defeat for Ukraine and, consequently, for Europe. 

“Among the European countries, Germany, despite a profound economic crisis, is by far the most powerful on the side of Ukraine, and the Chancellor is demonstrating his determination to fulfill this responsibility these days. 

“At the EU summit, three EU states—Hungary, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia—opposed further aid for Ukraine. Other, smaller countries expressed doubts. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, for several reasons, could not bring herself to offer consistent support for Ukraine. French President Emmanuel Macron cannot get his domestic political crisis under control because his country is more notable for its massive debt than for being a great nation. And Great Britain, since Brexit, stands alone anyway and only fits into this list because British Prime Minister Keir Starmer can only dream of achieving even Merz’s weak approval ratings. 

“This disunited, weakened Europe is therefore the one Merz must lead, because only a united EU, together with the British, Norwegians, Canadians, and Australians, can offer any meaningful resistance to the Russians, who are openly supported by China. And where the USA will stand in this conflict tomorrow is something even Donald Trump probably doesn’t know today…” 

“In Brussels, an agreement was finally reached on financing Ukraine, for which Merz, contrary to his convictions, also agreed to joint EU debt. The Chancellor did not achieve a complete victory. At a crucial moment, Europe failed to demonstrate the resolve to protect its own security interests, which Merz had so emphatically demanded on Monday. But: after the EU summit, Moscow must assume that Ukraine will continue fighting… 

“Now, however, there is at least a chance for talks that could lead to a ceasefire. Without the Chancellor, even this slim chance would probably not exist – and that currently makes Friedrich Merz Vladimir Putin’s most powerful opponent. How Russia will react to this will likely become clear soon.”

Spahn the New Chancellor? 

Focus wrote on December 20: 

“If Friedrich Merz were to fail as Chancellor, there is only one logical successor for FOCUS columnist Jan Fleischhauer. ‘If I had to bet on a replacement chancellor from the CDU right now,’ he says…, ‘I would say: Jens Spahn.’ 

“A name that polarizes. Spahn is considered politically tainted by many; he is accused of moral questionable behavior, from privately financed real estate purchases to the procurement of masks during the pandemic, which resulted in billions of euros in losses for taxpayers. 

“For Fleischhauer, however, the crucial question is not one of impeccable morals, but of political suitability. Spahn possesses qualities that would be more useful than detrimental in the Chancellor’s office. ‘He has the certain ruthlessness that you need for the job,’ says Fleischhauer. Added to this are toughness and assertiveness… less concern for internal party politics, more power instinct and leadership. And this is precisely where his comparison with Merz is telling….” 

Military Service in Germany

Die Zeit reported on December 19: 

“The Federal Council has approved the new military service. Starting in January 2026, all 18-year-olds born in 2008 and later will receive an information letter from the German armed forces (Bundeswehr). Men will then be required to fill out a questionnaire that, among other things, asks about their interest in serving in the Bundeswehr.  Filling out the questionnaire is voluntary for women. 

“The medical examination will also become mandatory again for 18-year-old men. The new military service will last between six and eleven months, or longer. The federal government aims to increase its attractiveness by offering, among other things, a monthly salary of €2,600 gross and a subsidy for a driver’s license. The goal is to meet the Bundeswehr’s personnel needs as precisely as possible. If not enough volunteers come forward, the Bundestag can enact a so-called compulsory service based on need, which would have to be regulated in a separate law.”

Conscription will be reintroduced.

Acknowledgement and Disclaimer: 

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

This Week in the News

“The US Wants to Destroy the EU… There Isn’t Much Time Left” 

Handelsblatt wrote on December 11: 

“The US is now among those who want to destroy the EU. But, as so often, Europe needs time to grasp the extent of what has been happening since the Trump administration took office… 

“With Russia, whose neo-imperial ambitions extend far beyond Ukraine, and with China, which is increasingly putting economic pressure on Europe,… the EU is now being pressured from three sides. All three actors share a common goal: to destroy the EU as a global economic power and to prevent its member states from becoming a politically relevant force in the emerging international order of the 21st century… 

“Europe must stop using the US as a point of reference for everything it does. It cannot influence the US in the long term. Let’s focus on Europe and strengthening its economic and defense policies. Then the US might rediscover its interest in a partnership. If so, fine; if not, that’s also fine. However, strengthening Europe means that there can be no taboos…

“Europe needs a defense union. And not among all EU members, but among those who are capable and willing… Such a development… requires political leadership and the courage to break with old traditions. There isn’t much time left to set such developments in motion, because Europe’s adversaries are already actively working to weaken or even destroy it.” 

The article recommends, in so many words, the creation of several core nations under strong leadership. The Bible says that ten powerful European nations or groups of nations will unite and give their might and authority to a charismatic military leader—the “beast.” 

Is the USA a Security Risk? 

t-online reported on December 11: 

“Trump’s new security strategy has been available for a week. Now the first NATO country has issued a security warning. 

“…The Danish foreign intelligence service has provided a first assessment of the Trump doctrine. Denmark is the first NATO country to officially warn against the USA. The United States is now ‘using its economic and technological strength as an instrument of power against allies and partners,’ it says… 

“Relations between Denmark and the USA are already strained. Immediately after the start of his second term, Trump laid claim to Greenland. The island is autonomous but belongs to Denmark. 

“In the report, the Danish foreign intelligence service now openly expresses its concerns regarding the USA. ‘There is uncertainty about the role of the United States as a guarantor of European security,’ the document states… With regard to the new document from the Trump administration and the new geopolitical positioning of the USA, the Danish foreign intelligence service generally warned of an increased security risk.”

Looking at the USA as a security risk for Europe is alarming. 

Angela Merkel Predicts New Conflict With the USA 

Bild Online wrote on December 12: 

“Will artificial intelligence trigger the next major clash between us and America? Former Chancellor Angela Merkel has now warned of this – she sees Europe in a tough power struggle with Donald Trump’s United States… At an event hosted by Stern magazine in Berlin, Merkel therefore called for binding rules for the use of AI… ‘This will be the next major battle with the United States of America over the question of whether or not we can regulate digital media.’…” 

“Merkel believes the US will try to prevent the establishment of rules for AI. ‘There will be very strong pressure not to do it,’ said the former chancellor…  Indeed, Trump just signed an executive order that is intended to prevent US states from introducing their own regulations for artificial intelligence… The former chancellor is generally critical of Trump’s new security strategy… 

“According to Merkel, organizations like the European Union are seen as ‘troublemakers’ in the US. Instead of negotiating with the EU as a whole, the US is trying to win over individual member states. ‘That cannot be in Europe’s interest,’ said Merkel.”

Merz Compares Merkel to Chamberlain and Putin to Hitler 

ntv reported on December 13: 

“At the CSU party conference, Chancellor Merz named restoring Germany’s competitiveness and defense capabilities as the top priorities of his government.  Domestically, he wants to bring about a new beginning; in foreign policy, he aims to prevent the worst… He heavily criticizes the policies of former Chancellor Angela Merkel, although he… does not mention her by name. He says that we should have known what kind of times we were living in even before February 24, 2022 – the day Russia launched its large-scale invasion of Ukraine. The day ‘we should have known’ was in May 2014 – when the war in the Ukrainian Donbas, initially waged covertly by Russia, escalated. 

“‘In those days, a historical analogy was frequently invoked,’ Merz says. ‘2014 was compared to 1914, the beginning of the First World War, into which Europe sleepwalked… It would have been more accurate to see 1938 as the historical analogy: the Munich Agreement, in which British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain ceded the Czechoslovakian Sudetenland to Nazi Germany.’ Indirectly, Merz is thus comparing Putin to Hitler. If Ukraine falls, that won’t be enough for the Russian leader, ‘just as the Sudetenland wasn’t enough in 1938.’ Putin’s goal is ‘the fundamental alteration of borders in Europe, the restoration of (Russia) to the borders of the old Soviet Union…’ 

“The ‘decades of Pax Americana,’ the years in which the USA guaranteed peace in Europe… ‘are largely over for us,’ Merz says…” 

Boris Pistorius’ Wisdom 

CBS News published on December 14 the following comments by German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius: 

“Germany is [the] third biggest economy in the world and the biggest one in Europe, of course. So everybody in Europe expects us to be the strongest ally in NATO in Europe. With the surge of federal funding, the long-moribund German defense industry is springing back to life… I try to explain that, if you want to live in peace, in freedom, security– with a right to go on the street and to demonstrate against or for whatever you want, to love however to want, and you to believe in any god you want, then you need to be willing to defend it.” 

But war—including “defensive war”– will never bring peace, but only more war. And so, the next world war, in which Germany will be heavily involved, will bring mankind to the brink of utter annihilation. 

War Is Closer Than We Think 

ladbible.com wrote on December 14: 

“A major [Viktor Andrusiv] in the Ukrainian army has warned that ‘war is closer than we think’ – and he believes that the UK isn’t ready for it… 

“Earlier this month, the Russian president stated that his country is ‘ready’ for war with Europe if it is instigated, sparking fears that the continent could soon be engulfed in conflict… ‘The biggest problem is that people are not going to believe that this can happen,’ Andrusiv told The Sun… ‘You should be aware of that. This is possible…’  He warned that the UK could soon resemble the war-torn streets of Ukraine…’”

The warnings we hear today focus on a possible war between Europe and Russia. However, World War III will begin with a war between Europe and the USA and the UK. Only very few people believe that such a war is possible, but that war “is closer than we think.” 

Russia Rejects Ceasefire or Peace Plan 

Euronews wrote on December 16: 

“Russia will not accept any ‘compromise’ regarding the occupied territories of Ukraine, Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said on Tuesday. Ryabkov stated that Moscow has not scaled back its demands and wants to retain control over five Ukrainian regions: Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson.

“Aside from annexed Crimea and almost all of the Luhansk region, Russia does not control the entirety of any of the other three areas of Ukraine. In Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, Moscow forces do not have control of the regional capitals either. As the European leaders vowed to protect Ukraine against Russia in the futureincluding via military means, the Kremlin now also demands security guarantees for Moscow….

“German Chancellor Friedrich Merz suggested on Monday in Berlin that Russia could pause its attacks during the holidays, which could eventually lead to the opening of negotiations for a genuine truce… But Moscow rejected the idea with Peskov saying, ‘We want peace. We don’t want a truce to give Ukraine a breathing space and prepare for a continuation of the war’…

“Moscow has repeatedly said its demands to Ukraine and any possible settlement remain the same. The US-Ukraine talks in Berlin have been largely criticised and dismissed in Moscow. The Kremlin [keeps] insisting that it won’t stop its war against Ukraine until the so-called ‘root causes’ are addressed.

“According to Moscow, the ‘root causes’ include Ukraine’s aspirations to join both the EU and NATO as well as NATO’s alleged violation of commitments not to expand eastwards, the Ukrainian government’s alleged discrimination against ethnic Russians and what Putin calls the ‘denazification’ of Ukraine. Putin and Russia have used these false arguments to justify the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, but failed to provide evidence for any of these allegations.” [Russia did provide some evidence for some of those allegations.]

The talks in Berlin accomplished absolutely nothing. 

Putin Not Ready For Peace

Bild Online wrote on December 17:

“President Vladimir Putin (73) has threatened Ukraine with further attacks if Kyiv and the West reject his demands in the ongoing peace talks… At his annual meeting with high-ranking military officials, the Kremlin dictator made it clear that while Moscow would prefer to achieve its goals at the negotiating table, ‘if the other side and its foreign backers refuse to enter into a substantive dialogue, Russia will achieve the liberation of its historical territories by military means’…

“In his speech, Putin also sharply attacked European heads of state and government, calling them ‘pigs’… His accusation: ‘They thought they could destroy Russia in no time…’ While the Trump administration is showing a willingness to find a peaceful solution, Putin sees no chance of that in Europe at present. The Kremlin chief demands that all conquered regions in eastern Ukraine, as well as those occupied in 2014, be returned to Russia. The annexed Crimea must be recognized as Russian territory. Furthermore, Moscow demands that the Ukrainian army withdraw from some still-contested regions. Kyiv refuses…”

Taking Frozen Russian Assets?

aa.com.tr wrote on December 13:

“Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban on Saturday described the EU’s plan to seize frozen Russian assets as a ‘declaration of war.’ Orban criticized European leaders, singling out German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, European People’s Party leader Manfred Weber, and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen… He added that Hungary would oppose any EU attempts to bypass the country in accessing Russian assets…

“Meanwhile, Italian Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini warned that freezing Russian assets was ‘risky and imprudent,’ noting that 314 Italian companies operate in Russia, generating revenue and employment…”

Kyivindependent wrote on December 16:

“Russia’s Central Bank has filed a lawsuit seeking 18.2 trillion rubles ($229 billion) in damages from Euroclear… The lawsuit marks the latest escalation in Moscow’s legal dispute with Euroclear, a Belgium-based central securities depository…

“Euroclear holds about 185 billion euros ($217 billion) of frozen Russian funds, which are subject to EU sanctions imposed after Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.”

Syria News wrote on December 17:

“The US warned the EU that seizing frozen Russian assets would undermine peace talks with Moscow, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk has said.”

Trump’s Rambling Speech 

Focus reported on December 12: 

“One absurd statement followed another: US President Donald Trump claimed during a speech on Thursday that European nations viewed him as a leader and respected him like never before… 

“‘Now we have the greatest country in the world. Everybody says it. Other heads of state and government say it. The European nations say it. The European nations are saying that your president could just as well be the leader of the European nations. They are listening to us and respecting us like never before.’” 

In what dream-world is Trump living? Trump is probably Europe’s most hated American president in recent history. 

“Trump Is Sleepwalking Into an Electoral Disaster” 

The Sun published on December 12 the following opinion by Editor-at-Large Harry Cole: 

“Donald Trump was on the stump in the bellwether swing state of Pennsylvania, addressing a rally of cheering red-capped fans… Yet instead of leaning into the issue that is quite literally draining American voters’ wallets, the President declared that prices were not a real problem any more and dismissed the Washington buzzword of ‘affordability’ as another Democrat ‘hoax’… 

“Here’s the problem: You can’t tell people drowning in bills that everything’s rosy. Working Americans… are feeling the pain of a cost-of-living saga that seems to never end… eating, clothing, and healthcare bills are huge. Poll after poll [shows] a brutal reality: Americans feel battered. Four in ten say it’s the worst cost of living they have ever experienced. And twice as many voters say President Trump, not Joe Biden, is responsible for the current state of the economy. 

“That should be a wake-up call for this administration that faces a battle for its survival in next year’s midterm elections… Despite branding Biden as ‘Sleepy’ it looks increasingly like it is President Trump sleepwalking into an electoral disaster in 2026… Meanwhile, his MAGA base is tearing itself apart with infighting and scores of Republican politicians are throwing in the towel rather than defending seats next year… 

“Voters aren’t insane… They just want to know someone in Washington lives on the same planet as they do. And when you’re in the White House showing off a new golden mega-ballroom while regular Americans are struggling to pay the bills, the optics ain’t great. Warning signs are everywhere…

“While it made lots of noise,  Donald Trump’s tariff experiment does not appear to be working. Meanwhile, the promised surge in US manufacturing has not materialised. Trump defended his import taxes raid this week, urging the public to stop buying cheap Chinese goods…”

The problem is: Suffering Americans will buy the cheapest goods they can get… no matter where they are coming from. Unless there is a drastic and fundamental change in Trump’s approach, he will pay dearly during the next midterm elections. The concept that Trump is sleepwalking into domestic and international disaster can be heard now more often. 

Key MAGA Voices Turn on Trump—“Pointless Address”

The Mirror wrote on December 18:

“Some of the key voices in the MAGA movement have turned on Trump after the president’s address interrupted prime time television…

“Trump delivered a politically charged address on Wednesday, attempting to blame Democrats for economic difficulties… His address recycled his recent talking points that have so far failed to ease public concerns about the costs of groceries, housing, utilities and other essential items….

“Matt Walsh, a right-wing political commentator and podcast host, was among those slamming Trump after the address. He wrote on X: ‘That was perhaps the most pointless primetime presidential address ever delivered in American history.’ Another MAGA voice – Majestic Glow – with 46,000 followers wrote on X: ‘Remember when Joe Biden and his administration would tell us all how great things were, and we all loudly rejected that…? Trump and his administration are doing the same thing.’”

The Atrocities of Trump’s Immigration System 

NBC News wrote on December 12: 

“… spouses of U.S. citizens… were recently detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement at what they thought were going to be routine green card interviews. There have been several dozen known cases out of San Diego alone, but cases have also been reported in New York City,  Cleveland and Utah…   

“Immigration attorneys told NBC News that this marks an ‘unprecedented’ break in decadeslong practice policy, and that their clients are panicked they could be detained even when they are eligible to become legal permanent residents by law and have no criminal histories… The detentions are one of the latest tactics in President Donald Trump’s policies targeting legal pathways for immigration and increasing scrutiny of green card applicants. 

“The Trump administration has said in multiple cases that people were detained because they had fallen out of status by overstaying their visas, but longtime attorneys say this has never been an issue and spouses of U.S. citizens looking to obtain green cards were granted exceptions by Congress. The law says that immediate relatives, such as spouses, of U.S. citizens are eligible for green cards even if they were in unlawful immigration status at the time they filed to become legal permanent residents…

“Attorneys said the exact number of people affected would be difficult to quantify, but all said many spouses of U.S. citizens seeking green cards could fall into the category of overstaying their visas. There are currently at least hundreds of thousands of people who are at some stage of the green card application process, according to United States Citizenship and Immigration Service data…” 

The Trump administration is changing immigration law without congressional authority. Where is the outcry in the USA about such conduct? 

More Immigration Regulations 

NBC San Diego wrote on December 12: 

“A woman from Afghanistan who worked for the U.S. military saw her citizenship oath ceremony canceled with little explanation after she was already approved, her attorney said, as the Trump administration indefinitely pauses all immigration applications for people from 19 countries. ‘We knew it was coming, but we didn’t expect it to come for people who are only scheduled for like a celebratory ceremony, to celebrate becoming a citizen,’ said immigration attorney Habib Hasbini… 

“She applied for citizenship this year [after having had a green card for five years], Hasbini said, and her application was approved in October… But before her… ceremony, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services sent her a letter that said ‘due to unforeseen circumstances, we have had to cancel the previously scheduled Oath Ceremony.’… 

“The letter arrived after the Trump administration announced in late November a pause on any immigration applications from 19 countries, including Afghanistan, Haiti and Somalia, among others… There’s little indication when the pause will be lifted, if ever. At a rally in Pennsylvania on Tuesday, President Donald Trump touted the move. ‘I’ve also announced a permanent pause on third-world migration including from hellholes like Afghanistan, Haiti, Somalia and many other countries,’ he said to cheers from the crowd.” 

One wonders who those people are who support this—including, as we reported in last week’s Current Events—, the new contemplated rules regarding revealing Social Media activities (including watching, liking and sharing as well as posting videos) when wanting to enter the USA as a tourist. The scope of “Social Media” includes, among many others: 

Facebook, WhatsApp, YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, Telegram, Messenger, Reddit, Pinterest, X (formerly Twitter) and Rumble.   

In order to receive an ESTA, visitors are supposed to reveal all their activities for the last five years regarding any of those Social Media platforms. This new “law” is supposed to become effective within the next 60 days. It is strongly recommended that anyone who is contemplating to enter the USA as a tourist, file for an ESTA application now. Once approved, an ESTA is valid for 2 years. 

Denaturalizing Law-Abiding Citizens?

The New York Times wrote on December 17:

“The Trump administration plans to ramp up efforts to strip some naturalized Americans of their citizenship… The guidance, issued on Tuesday to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services field offices, asks that they ‘supply Office of Immigration Litigation with 100-200 denaturalization cases per month’ in the 2026 fiscal year…

“Under federal law, people may be denaturalized only if they committed fraud while applying for citizenship, or in a few other narrow circumstances. But the Trump administration has shown a zeal for using every tool at its disposal to target legal and illegal immigrants, leading activists to warn that such a campaign could sweep up people who had made honest mistakes on their citizenship paperwork and sow fear among law-abiding Americans.”

Trump’s Outrageous, Vicious and Insane Ranting on Rob Reiner’s Murder 

The New York Post wrote on December 15: 

“President Trump on Monday said murdered actor-director Rob Reiner had ‘driven people CRAZY’ with his opposition to the Republican chief executive, with his bizarre ranting post on Truth Social prompting outrage from critics of all political persuasions. Reiner, 78, and his wife Michele, 68, were found butchered in their Los Angeles home Sunday afternoon, allegedly at the hands of their… son Nick, 32 [who reportedly had drug addiction and other issues and who has been charged with two counts of murder]. 

“‘A very sad thing happened last night in Hollywood,’ Trump wrote on Truth Social. ‘Rob Reiner, a tortured and struggling, but once very talented movie director and comedy star, has passed away, together with his wife, Michele, reportedly due to the anger he caused others through his massive, unyielding, and incurable affliction with a mind crippling disease known as TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME, sometimes referred to as TDS. He was known to have driven people CRAZY by his raging obsession of President Donald J. Trump, with his obvious paranoia reaching new heights as the Trump Administration surpassed all goals and expectations of greatness, and with the Golden Age of America upon us, perhaps like never before. May Rob and Michele rest in peace!’… 

Even conservatives were outraged by the president’s comments… Post columnist and Commentary magazine editor John Podhoretz [wrote:] ‘Trump disgraces America with his tweet.’ Charles C. W. Cooke of National Review Online wrote, ‘That Trump wrote this is insane and disgraceful. That the White House chose to tweet it out is pathological.’… 

“Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) said, ‘Regardless of how you felt about Rob Reiner, this is inappropriate and disrespectful discourse about a man who was just brutally murdered. I guess my elected GOP colleagues, the VP, and White House staff will just ignore it because they’re afraid?’” 

The Associated Press added on December 15:

“President Donald Trump on Monday blamed Rob Reiner’s outspoken opposition to the president for the actor-director’s killing, delivering the unsubstantiated claim in a shocking post that seemed intent on decrying his opponents even in the face of a tragedy. The statement, even for Trump, was a shocking comment… Trump has a long track record of inflammatory remarks, but his comments in a social media post were a drastic departure from the role presidents typically play in offering a message of consolation or tribute after the death of a public figure. His message drew criticism even from conservatives and his supporters and laid bare Trump’s unwillingness to rise above political grievance in moments of crisis… 

 “The unsympathetic message was the latest example of Trump’s unsparing prism through which he views those he perceives as enemies. He made retribution against political enemies a prime focus of his campaign for the White House last year. And he has in the past made light of violence when it’s befallen those on the other side of the political aisle… That’s despite his comments after the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk earlier this year. Trump said Kirk’s killing was ‘the tragic consequence of demonizing those with whom you disagree.’… 

“Jenna Ellis, who was one of Trump’s lawyers and worked on his efforts in 2020 to overturn the results of the presidential election, pointed out Trump’s double standard and called his post… ‘a horrible example from Trump (and surprising considering the two attempts on his own life) and should be condemned by everyone with any decency,’ Ellis said in a post on X.” 

The Sun wrote on December 15: 

President Trump’s unfounded claims regarding the couple’s death have sparked outrage among social media users. ‘This is the most disgusting post Donald Trump has ever made…Imagine if I said this about Charlie Kirk,’ political commentator Brian Kassenstein posted on X.   

“Sirius XM host and MSNBC contributor Max Burns also called out the president on his comments. ‘I don’t want to hear another sanctimonious word from the Republicans who accused Democrats of not showing enough sadness when Charlie Kirk died,’ Burns posted on X. ’Donald Trump’s message about Rob and Michele Reiner’s death is a monstrosity.’” 

Piers Morgan “ordered” Trump to delete his “dreadful” and “unacceptable” post (Daily Express, December 15). 

Rob Reiner’s acting credits include “Throw Momma from the Train,” and “Sleepless in Seattle.” He directed movies such as “The Princess Bride,” “When Harry Met Sally,” “A few Good Men” and “The American President.” His wife Michele was a photographer who took the famous photo of Trump that graced the cover of his bestselling 1987 book, “The Art of the Deal.” 

Trump’s Gaza Plan—Utter Failure

Israel365News wrote on December 14: 

“The plan championed by the Trump administration is on the verge of being hijacked – not by Israel, but by the very states that have spent years arming, financing, and glorifying Hamas. At the Doha Forum, Qatar, Egypt, and Turkey dispensed with diplomatic subtleties and openly demanded changes that would render the entire plan meaningless. Their proposed ‘revisions’ would force an Israeli withdrawal before Hamas disarms, insert an international force that refuses to confront Hamas, and hard-wire Hamas’s continued rule into the future of Gaza. 

“The astonishing part is not that Qatar and Turkey are attempting this maneuver – it is that Washington is allowing it. The US is ignoring the plainly anti-Western ideological motives of its supposed partners, and in doing so, it is sleepwalking into a strategic catastrophe… 

Egypt’s foreign minister [was] demanding that an International Stabilization Force deploy immediately – not to restrain Hamas, but to restrain Israel… Washington’s strategic failure becomes glaring. For years, American policymakers have clung to the fantasy that Qatar and Turkey are ‘moderating influences,’ countries that can rein in extremist groups. This is willful blindness. Qatar and Turkey do not moderate extremists – they sponsor them. They do not want a stable, demilitarized Gaza – they want a Gaza in which the Muslim Brotherhood retains its foothold… 

“Qatar shelters Hamas leadership, glorifies Hamas on Al Jazeera, and bankrolls Muslim Brotherhood movements across the region. Turkey’s president, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, praises Hamas as ‘freedom fighters,’ calls for Israel’s destruction, and funnels support to Brotherhood-aligned groups everywhere.” 

Trump calls the dictator and autocrat, Erdogan, his friend. That says it all.

The “Menetekel” from Sydney 

Die Welt Online wrote on December 15: 

“…the deadly attack on a Hanukkah celebration [with 1,000 attendees] at the popular Bondi Beach in Sydney… [and the murder of at least sixteen people by two or perhaps three suspected Islamist terrorists] is evidence of a grotesque reversal of perpetrator and victim roles, demonstrating that Jews worldwide have had to contend with rising antisemitism since the massacre of October 7, 2023 – including the approximately 120,000 Jews in Australia, many of whom live in the greater Sydney area. 

“Just two days after the attack on the Supernova festival, which left 1,200 dead, pro-Palestinian groups chanted anti-Jewish slogans in front of the famous Sydney Opera House. There have been death threats against prominent Australian Jews, attacks on synagogues, and vandalism against Jewish businesses… 

“The attack in Sydney shows once again that the fight against antisemitism is not solely a Jewish responsibility, but a challenge for society as a whole, affecting all citizens – because it concerns universal values such as human dignity and the rule of law. A society in which Jews are not safe will not remain a free society in the long run.” 

The Curse of Global Warming Propaganda?

On December 13, the Daily Mail published the following article by Matt Ridley:

“By failing to secure new pledges for a cut in fossil fuels, [the recent] Cop30 [summit in Brazil] achieved less than nothing…

“… no scare grew as big or lasted as long as global warming… Politicians welcomed the chance to blame others: if a wildfire or a flood devastates your town, point the finger at the changing climate rather than your own failure to prepare

“[Bill] Gates… is correct to say that getting cheap, reliable, clean energy to the poor is by far the more urgent priority… The climacatastrophe has been a terrible mistake. It diverted attention from real environmental problems, cost a fortune, impoverished consumers, perpetuated indoor pollution and poverty, frightened young people into not having children, wasted years of our time, undermined democracy and corrupted science…” 

Reclassification of Medical Marijuana

ABC News wrote on December 18:

“President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Thursday reclassifying marijuana as a less dangerous drug. Currently, cannabis is classified as a Schedule I drug, the most restrictive federal category that includes heroin and LSD. Under this change, it moves to a Schedule III drug, putting it in the same group as some common prescription painkillers such as Tylenol with codeine….

“The White House is stressing that this change makes it easier for scientists to study marijuana, especially around its potential to treat chronic pain and other conditions. ‘The executive order the President will sign today is focused on increasing medical research for medical marijuana and CBD,’ a senior administration official told ABC News ahead [of] the signing.”

 An overdue move to be applauded.

The Next Big Financial Crash Is Coming—But When? 

On December 9, the Daily Mail published the following article by Ruth Sunderland: 

“Dr Michael Burry singled out two of the biggest winners of the Artificial Intelligence frenzy, Nvidia – a computer chip maker – and Palantir, a data analytics giant. The renowned investor explained that he had taken out bets that both will fall heavily within two years. He also derided bitcoin, whose value has shot up over the past five years, as ‘the most ridiculous thing… worse than a tulip bulb’ – a reference to the Dutch craze for the flower in the 17th century. Bitcoin has recently fallen back… 

“Burry argued that this AI bubble ‘looks an awful lot like the dot-com bubble’, which burst in 2000 after years of euphoria about the internet. 

“Burry… is in fact legendary for predicting the 2008 sub-prime mortgage meltdown, making hundreds of millions of dollars for himself and his clients while the rest of the financial system went into freefall… So when Burry warns the astonishing surge in AI shares will end badly, big investors take notice, even if they beg to differ… doubts are growing that the technology is turning into a bottomless money pit for investors and that the promised returns on the vast investments being made will prove elusive… 

“A major collapse in AI-linked shares would not be confined to the US markets or to tech stocks. Banks could face rising bad debts, global stock markets would slump and pension pots would shrink… 

“Burry is far from infallible. In 2017 he predicted a global meltdown that would trigger World War III, which has not happened yet. Two years later he warned of a bubble driven by index-tracking funds, which has not yet materialised either. He also bet against Tesla in late 2020 – just before its shares accelerated further… Burry has been predicting a crash for years in the US as stocks continue to soar… 

“In the run-up to the 2008 crash, Wall Street banks bundled risky ‘sub-prime’ mortgages into supposedly safe bonds. However, they did not account for the high chance many borrowers would be unable to repay their loans… It is relatively easy to spot a market that is over-valued and ripe for a fall, but what is really hard is predicting when the meltdown will come – and getting that wrong can prove costly… This time [Burry] admits he does not know when the AI bubble will burst and says the 2008 experience was unique… 

“Burry’s track record includes moments of brilliance but also some notable misfires. Plenty of experts believe the AI boom has further to run, and that selling out now would mean missing out on more profit. Investors must make up their own minds – but it is hard to ignore the doctor who diagnosed the last great financial crash.” 

Bulgaria Becomes the Newest Member of the Eurozone 

Bild Online reported on December 12: 

“From January 1, Bulgaria will also be part of the Eurozone.  However, the times there are turbulent: Following protests, the Bulgarian government resigned on Thursday. The resignation came shortly before the introduction of the euro and its own new coins… As the 21st country, Bulgaria is officially adopting the common currency… 

Six EU states are retaining their own currencies: Poland, Hungary, Sweden, Denmark, the Czech Republic, and Romania. They belong to the EU – but not to the Eurozone… There are already approximately 141 billion euro coins in circulation. Billions more from Bulgaria will soon be added.” 

Acknowledgement and Disclaimer: 

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

This Week in the News 

U.S. Gives Europe Three-Year Ultimatum 

Espreso wrote on December 5: 

“The Pentagon has informed European diplomats that the United States expects NATO’s European members to take control of the alliance’s conventional defense operations by 2027… The ultimatum marks a significant departure from decades of American military leadership in the transatlantic partnership. 

“During meetings with European delegations, Defense Department officials indicated that recent European efforts to strengthen military capabilities following Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine have fallen short of expectations. Pentagon representatives warned that failure to meet the deadline could result in the United States withdrawing from certain NATO coordination mechanisms… 

“The European Union has already established its own target of achieving independent defense readiness by 2030, acknowledging substantial gaps in air defense, drone technology, cyber warfare, and ammunition production. Defense analysts consider even that more extended deadline highly ambitious…” 

Is the USA inadvertently and foolishly creating a Frankenstein monster? 

Trump Warns Europe of Losing National Identity 

The Guardian wrote on December 5: 

“[A new American strategy] document, with a signed introduction by Trump, says Europe is in economic decline but its ‘real problems are even deeper’, including ‘activities of the EU that undermine political liberty and sovereignty, migration policies that are transforming the continent, censorship of free speech and suppression of political opposition … and loss of national identities’… 

“The 33-page exposition…  appears to espouse the… ‘great replacement’ conspiracy theory [which claims ethnic white European populations are deliberately being replaced by non-white peoples], saying several countries risk becoming ‘majority non-European’ and Europe faces ‘the real and stark prospect of civilisational erasure’… 

“The policy document, released by the White House late on Thursday, underscores the Trump administration’s clear alignment with Europe’s far-right nationalist parties, whose policies centre on attacking supposed EU overreach and excessive non-EU migration… With far-right parties either in government, supporting rightwing coalitions or leading in the polls in several EU member states, the document says the ‘growing influence of patriotic European parties … gives cause for great optimism’.” 

Europe is not amused. Note the next article. 

“Mind Your Own Business” 

Deutsche Welle wrote on December 5: 

“German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul (CDU)… said Berlin did not need external lectures on freedom of expression or the organization of democratic societies… 

“Jürgen Hardt, the foreign policy spokesman of Germany’s ruling conservative CDU/CSU alliance was also critical of the US strategy. ‘The assessment of the US president on Europe, it’s very much single colored, maybe due to information he got from the wrong sides like right [wing] radical parties in Europe, or sometimes it sounds like [Russian President Vladimir] Putin talking about Europe,’ Hardt told DW. 

“Hardt expressed concerns about the US strategy, suggesting Trump ‘wants to engage actively in politics in European Union member states.’ ‘We did not [engage] in the US, and we expect that the US is not doing so in German democracies,’ he said… 

“The European Commission strongly rejected the accusations against the EU that the US strategy made.” 

Trump to Divide Europe?

The Daily Mail wrote on December 11:

“A US defense website claims to have seen a leaked document unveiling a dramatic US proposal to prise four countries away from the European Union…  The secret file, reported by Defense One, supposedly claims Trump intends to pull Austria, Italy, Hungary and Poland away from the EU and closer in to Washington’s circle of influence – a move that would rip through the continent’s political landscape…

“The White House has since come out swinging, vehemently denying the claims as the leak triggered widespread alarm among European media outlets and spiralled across social platforms…

“But Defense One upped the stakes hours later, publishing extracts from what it described as a ‘fuller version’ of the strategy that reportedly circulated behind closed doors before the White House unveiled the public edition. According to the outlet, the more expansive draft explicitly listed Poland, Austria, Italy and Hungary as countries the US should ‘work more with… with the goal of pulling them away from the [European Union].’..

“The reaction to the strategy from Europe was instant and furious…”

 Austria responded by condemning Trump’s planned strategy. It is clear that they accept the leaked document as genuine.

The US No Longer on Europe’s Side 

Bild Online wrote on December 8: 

“The new US ‘National Security Strategy’ is changing the world – and times will change even more rapidly for Europe and Germany than before. Experts are concerned and making dramatic predictions… 

“A top foreign policy expert is now outlining the painful consequences for Germany. ‘The new US foreign policy stance is a second turning point,’ said Norbert Röttgen, deputy chairman of the CDU/CSU parliamentary group. ‘For the first time since the end of World War II, the US is no longer on the side of the Europeans. It is no longer on the side of Ukraine, a country against which a brutal war of annihilation is being waged in violation of international law.'” 

Europeans See a Hostile U.S. 

The Washington Post wrote on December 9: 

“Relations between the U.S. and Europe hit a low point as President Donald Trump’s security strategy slams Europe but largely ignores threats from Russia and China… 

“A new U.S. national security strategy berating Europe has triggered a wave of acrimony across the Atlantic, enraging and dismaying European officials who say the document has turned the Trump administration’s vitriol against European democracies into formal policy. 

“President Donald Trump’s push to halt the war in Ukraine on terms favorable to Russia, as well as the European Union’s announcement Friday of a roughly $140 million fine against X for violating the bloc’s digital rules, have fueled the fire, pushing transatlantic relations to their lowest point since Trump returned to the White House in January. 

“Elon Musk, the owner of X, is calling for abolishing the E.U., and Trump supporters are railing against the 27-nation bloc… Tensions erupted after the U.S. strategy painted the E.U. as a bigger threat than Russia or China… The document lays bare the depth of the rift in the 80-year-old Western alliance, European officials and analysts say, and serves as proof that European nations should strive for greater military independence. 

“From the start of Trump’s term, the president’s inner circle has bashed Europe… European Council President António Costa… urged Europe to understand that ‘post-World War II alliances have changed’ and to get ready to ‘protect ourselves not only against our adversaries, but also against the allies who challenge us.’… 

“Former E.U. commissioner Thierry Breton [stated] that the ‘very shocking’ document puts it ‘in black and white’ that the White House sees European institutions ‘as an enemy’ it wants to ‘destabilize.’… 

“This is certainly not the first transatlantic rift. During George W. Bush’s administration, there was a bitter split over the U.S. invasion of Iraq, and Trump’s first term was also divisive. But polling this year suggests growing alienation, with more and more Europeans viewing ties with America negatively or even as adversarial… Trump once said the E.U… was formed to ‘screw’ the United States… 

“But not everyone was displeased by the U.S. vision for Europe. The Alternative for Germany (AfD)… cheered the security strategy as ‘a foreign policy reality check for Europe, and especially for Germany.’ Hungary’s… prime minister, Viktor Orban… praised Musk ‘for holding the line’ against what he called an ‘attack on X’…  As Europeans fumed, Moscow welcomed aspects of the new U.S. strategy… 

“Some, however, criticized E.U. and national leaders for not hitting back harder. The E.U.’s former top diplomat, Josep Borrell, on Tuesday called the U.S. strategy ‘a declaration of political war’… Borrell called on European leaders to ‘stop pretending that Trump is not our adversary, hiding behind a fearful and complacent silence, and instead assert the EU’s sovereignty.’” 

Trump’s Interview with Politico 

Politico wrote on December 12: 

“President Donald Trump denounced Europe as a ‘decaying’ group of nations led by ‘weak’ people in an interview with POLITICO, belittling the traditional U.S. allies for failing to control migration and end the Russia-Ukraine war… The broadside attack against European political leadership represents the president’s most virulent denunciation to date of these Western democracies, threatening a decisive rupture with countries like France and Germany that already have deeply strained relations with the Trump administration… 

“In recent days, European capitals have shuddered with dismay at the release of Trump’s new National Security Strategy, a highly provocative manifesto that cast the Trump administration in opposition to the mainstream European political establishment… In the interview, Trump amplified that worldview.” 

Trump also said this in the interview:

“… if it keeps going the way it’s going, Europe will not be … in my opinion, uh, many of those countries will not be viable countries any longer. Their immigration policy is a disaster. What they’re doing with immigration is a disaster…. Europe, they’re coming in from all parts of the world. Not just the Middle East, they’re coming in from the Congo, tremendous numbers of people coming from the Congo. And even worse, they’re coming from prisons of the Congo and many other countries.” 

When asked whether the USA and Europe will remain allies, he answered: 

You know, it depends. They’ll change their ideology, obviously, because the people coming in have a totally different ideology. But uh, it’s uh … it’s gonna make them much weaker. They’ll be a much … they’ll be much weaker, and they’ll be much different… When they allow millions of people to pour into their countries, many of these people are committing tremendous crimes…  I get reports that you will never see. And I think it’s horrible what’s happening to Europe. I think it’s endangering Europe as we know it.” 

“Europe—You Are on Your Own!” 

On December 10, The Daily Mail published the following article by Andrew Neil:

“Donald Trump to Europe: ‘You’re on your own, losers. Bye!’ That’s the blunt message at the heart of his administration’s new National Security Strategy… 

“Now, in a lot of what Trump has to say about Europe, he’s not wrong. Europe is indeed cursed with a weak and feckless leadership… Even so, the implications of Trump’s new strategy document are chilling… It would be hard to think of a more dramatic rupture between America and the governing elites of Europe’s most important countries, including Germany, France and even Britain. If Trump truly means what his strategy paper says, it’s hard to see Nato in its current guise surviving for long… 

His Ukraine peace plan is going nowhere. I suspect he’ll simply throw his toys out of the pram and give up, abandoning Europe at a time when it is ill-equipped to stand on its own two feet… even as Putin, encouraged by Trump’s indifference, grows more emboldened on Europe’s eastern borders.” 

EU’s Fine of Musk Attack on America? 

Fox Business wrote on December 6: 

“Elon Musk and Trump administration officials delivered blistering criticism of the European Union after its executive branch issued a $140 million fine against Musk’s social media platform, X. ‘The EU should be abolished and sovereignty returned to individual countries, so that governments can better represent their people,’ Musk wrote on X on Saturday.. 

“The European Commission said Friday it was fining X for ‘non-compliance with transparency obligations’ under the Digital Services Act (DSA), adding that it was specifically ‘holding X accountable’ for what the EU deems ‘deceptive’ design of X’s ‘blue checkmark,’ a ‘lack of transparency of its advertising repository,’ and ‘failure to provide access to public data for researchers.’ …

“On Friday, in response to an X post from Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, calling the fine an ‘abomination’ and saying that President Donald Trump should impose sanctions ‘until this travesty is reversed,’ Musk replied, ‘The “EU” imposed this crazy fine not just on X, but also on me personally, which is even more insane! Therefore, it would seem appropriate to apply our response not just to the EU, but also to the individuals who took this action against me,’ Musk wrote… 

“Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on X that the fine ‘isn’t just an attack on X, it’s an attack on all American tech platforms and the American people by foreign governments.’.. 

“Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on X, ‘The Digital Services Act is designed to stifle free speech and American tech companies…’ 

“‘Foreign bureaucrats have zero right to tell Americans what they can and can’t say,’ added Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Mo….” 

At the same time, the Trump Administration tries to tell Europeans what they can and can’t say (note the articles above). 

Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau posted on X: 

“What’s even worse is that the US is in a MILITARY ALLIANCE with the very countries attacking us via the EU. As noted earlier this year, this contradiction cannot continue. The nations of Europe cannot look to the US for their own security at the same time they affirmatively undermine the security of the US itself through the (unelected, undemocratic, and unrepresentative) EU. This fine is just the tip of the iceberg. As I mentioned to every European leader I just met at the NATO Ministerial Meeting in Brussels, the EU’s support of the Communist and anti-American regime in Cuba is another striking example of the EU affirmatively undermining US security while the vast majority of its member states look to the US for their own security via NATO… the time for games is over.”

This is tough language, showing that the “friendship” between the USA and the EU is declining fast. 

EU Censors US? 

On December 8, 2025, Zerohedge published the following article by Tyler Durden: 

“Elon Musk is not taking the outrageous fine from Brussels bureaucrats lying down, lashing out at EU officialdom for taking on Nazi characteristics and oppressing their own citizens’ best interests… Musk also re-shared a post about Irish teacher Enoch Burke, who was jailed for refusing to use transgender pronouns, and later replied to another user, ‘So many politicians in Europe who are traitors to their own people.’ And Musk highlighted the fact that Meta has a verification program similar to X’s, yet the EU hasn’t onerously fined the more censorship-prone Meta… 

“The EU has virtually declared war on free speech and is targeting American companies… Not surprisingly, X was the chosen target – a company blamed by many in the EU and the U.S. for rolling back free-speech protections. In essence, it’s punishment for not bending the knee to the EU’s iron-fisted control over online content… This isn’t a one-off slap; it’s the culmination of years of threats and harassment… Further, Musk brings receipts showing the European Union sent him a formal letter demanding that he censor Donald Trump during the 2024 US presidential election… 

“At the heart of it all is the EU’s obsession with controlling information flows… These moves expose the hypocrisy: the EU claims to champion democracy but builds an Orwellian apparatus that monitors, scans, and punishes speech. It’s not about safety—it’s about power. This latest EU assault on X has infuriated US Vice President JD Vance, who yesterday, as rumors of the impending penalty circulated, took to X and posted: ‘The EU should be supporting free speech not attacking American companies over garbage.’…  German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius called Vance’s opinions ‘unacceptable,’ proving Vance’s point about normalized authoritarianism… 

“With Trump back in the White House and Vance as a key ally, expect pushback: America won’t stand idly by as allies erode the very freedoms that define the West. The $140 million hit on X isn’t just a fine—it’s a declaration of war on uncensored dialogue. Musk’s platform remains one of the last major outposts where ideas flow freely, unhampered by globalist filters. As the EU tightens its grip, the message is clear: comply or be crushed… This is just the first salvo in a war that some of us have warned is coming.” 

Voluntary Military Service in Germany – For Now! 

BBC wrote on December 5: 

“Germany’s parliament, the Bundestag, has voted to introduce voluntary military service… It marks a significant shift in Germany’s approach to its military and follows Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s push to create Europe’s strongest conventional army. 

“The change means that all 18-year-olds in Germany will be sent a questionnaire from January 2026 asking if they are interested and willing to join the armed forces. The form will be mandatory for men and voluntary for women. 

“Students at schools across Germany have said they will join strikes in as many as 90 cities on Friday to protest against the move… Many young Germans either oppose the new law or are sceptical. ‘We don’t want to spend half a year of our lives locked up in barracks, being trained in drill and obedience and learning to kill,’ the organisers of the protests wrote in a statement posted on social media. ‘War offers no prospects for the future and destroys our livelihoods.’ In Hamburg alone, about 1,500 people were expected to join the protests, and school head teachers warned parents not to take their children out of school for the day. 

“The government says military service will be voluntary for as long as possible, but from July 2027, all 18-year-old men will have to take a medical exam to assess their fitness for possible military service… While the plan is for voluntary service, if the security situation worsens or if too few volunteers came forward, a form of compulsory military service could be considered by the Bundestag…” 

Many young people see the writing on the wall. Politicians don’t care and move full steam ahead. Note the next article.

Young Germans Opposed to Conscription 

Sky News reported on December 6: 

“Across the country, students gathered to demonstrate against what they fear will be a return to conscription. In Berlin, they held signs saying, ‘You can’t have our lives if we don’t eat your lies’… 

“While most demonstrators were in their late teens or twenties, some parents also turned out with their younger children. One mother held a placard declaring: ‘You can’t have my son’… ‘None of us want to die for a country that doesn’t really care about us,’ [a student] tells me… [Another demonstrator said:] ‘I don’t think it’s right to send children or anyone against their will into the military, because war is just wrong…’ 

“‘From my friends no one wants to volunteer because we don’t want to fight for a problem that’s not really ours. We didn’t start the problems, they [the government] did,’ says [another student.]” 

Europe Is Arming Fast 

Patreon wrote on December 5: 

“Europe is undergoing one of its most consequential military transformations in decades, led by a Germany that is quietly but decisively reshaping the continent’s defence architecture. Berlin has unveiled a sweeping €377 billion, 39-page procurement blueprint designed to forge what officials now openly call ‘the strongest conventional army in Europe.’ This unprecedented rearmament push, spanning land, air, sea, cyber and space, marks a fundamental departure from Germany’s post-Cold War posture — and signals the emergence of a nation preparing for confrontation in the absence of any direct, imminent threat

“Politically, the shift has been accelerated by conservative leader Friedrich Merz, who has argued that the Bundeswehr must be given ‘all the financial resources it needs.’ Behind that message lies a reordering of national priorities: cuts to social spending paired with record-scale defence investments. With Germany carving military spending out of its constitutional debt brake, Berlin now has the ability to sustain vast, multi-year procurement programmes. More than 320 new weapons projects are planned for the next budget cycle alone, with nearly half ready to be awarded to contractors — overwhelmingly German firms. Rheinmetall leads the pack, poised to receive more than €88 billion, followed by missile-maker Diehl Defence. 

“Germany’s ambitions extend far beyond terrestrial borders. More than €14 billion is earmarked for new satellite capabilities, including a €9.5 billion low-Earth-orbit constellation, forming the backbone of a €35 billion push into military space systems.

“But Germany is not alone. Poland has emerged as a central European military power, with its defence budget tripling in a decade and reaching 4.12 percent of GDP in 2024 — the highest in NATO… these developments signal a new European chapter defined by rearmament, industrial revival and rising geopolitical tensions — with profound implications for citizens, budgets and the continent’s long-term stability.” 

“Stop Relying on Washington” 

Politico wrote on December 4: 

“It’s time for Europeans to stop trailing behind Donald Trump and instead draw up their own peace plan for Ukraine, Defense Commissioner [and former Lithuanian prime minister] Andrius Kubilius told POLITICO. 

“The EU ‘needs to be independent or at least be ready to be strong in geopolitical developments, including to have our plans on how peace in Ukraine can be brought and to discuss them with our transatlantic partners,’ Kubilius said.” 

He also said that Europe needs to stop relying on US-led proposals. 

Finland Not Ready to Give NATO-Style Guarantees to Ukraine

Helsinki Times wrote on December 2: 

“Finland will not offer NATO-style security guarantees to Ukraine, Prime Minister Petteri Orpo said on Tuesday. Speaking at a joint press conference with Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson in Espoo, Orpo confirmed that Finland is prepared to assist in developing Ukraine’s security structures [through logistical and organizational support], but not to provide commitments comparable to NATO’s Article 5… 

“Orpo emphasised that only major powers such as the United States or larger European countries could realistically commit to security guarantees… Kristersson… said he would not comment directly on the guarantee issue but stated that Ukraine’s strongest protection is its own armed forces. He said European support should focus on helping Ukraine maintain a capable military.” 

Belgium Opposed to Freezing Russian Assets 

The Press United wrote on December 3: 

“Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever has launched a new attack on the EU’s plan to use frozen Russian assets for a loan to Ukraine, describing it as ‘a complete illusion’ to think that Kiev could defeat Moscow and force it to pay reparations. 

“Under the proposal, the bloc would leverage about €140 billion ($162 billion) in immobilized Russian sovereign assets – most of them held at Brussels-based clearing house Euroclear – to guarantee a so-called ‘reparations loan’ for Ukraine. Belgium has vehemently protested the plan… 

“Russia, meanwhile, has branded such ideas ‘theft’ and warned of far-reaching legal and retaliatory steps if its reserves are stolen… 

“The Belgian leader further warned that Moscow would not ‘calmly accept’ confiscation, pointing to the risk that Russia could seize Western-owned factories and some €16 billion ($18.6 billion) held by Euroclear in Russia. He added that Belarus or China could follow suit by targeting Western assets on their soil.” 

Russian Money for Ukraine to the US? 

Handelsblatt wrote on December 4: 

“A new dispute is brewing between the EU and the US: It concerns the use of the €210 billion of the Russian central bank’s assets frozen in Europe. The EU wants to access these assets to support Ukraine. But Washington has its own plans.

“In an interview with Handelsblatt, the US ambassador to the EU, Andrew Puzder, said he expects the assets to be used according to American wishes. From the US perspective, the seized billions are part of the bargaining chips for peace talks with Moscow… 

“In a guest article published Wednesday in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ), Chancellor Friedrich Merz (CDU) reaffirmed that Europe cannot ‘leave the decision to other, non-European states regarding what happens to the financial resources of an aggressor that have been legally frozen within the jurisdiction of our rule of law and in our own currency.’”

Tagesschau added on December 5: 

Merz rejects US demands to transfer a large portion of the funds to the United States. ‘This money must flow to Ukraine and help Ukraine.’ The US government is also aware of this position [according to Merz].” 

There are now many areas where the USA and the EU disagree fundamentally.

Zelensky Rejects Trump’s “Peace Plan” 

MSN wrote on December 8: 

Ukraine will not surrender territory, President Volodymyr Zelensky declared Monday, rejecting a central Russian demand that President Donald Trump had incorporated into his latest proposal to end the Kremlin’s war. ‘Under our laws, under international law — and under moral law — we have no right to give anything away,’ Zelensky said, after meeting with top European leaders to discuss Trump’s plan Monday. ‘That is what we are fighting for.’ The unequivocal declaration that Ukraine will not surrender land could mark the collapse of Trump’s plan, which critics condemned as fulfilling a wish list of Russian President Vladimir Putin… 

“Zelensky said Ukraine will not surrender its territory in the eastern Donbas region — not to hasten peace talks, not to satisfy Washington’s push for compromise and not under pressure from Moscow’s continuing military onslaught… Trump over the weekend again cast Kyiv as the obstacle to the American-championed proposal, accusing Zelensky of slow-walking the plan, even as Moscow has shown little, if any, willingness to compromise on its maximalist demands

“Trump’s continuing pressure, including his stern tone toward Ukraine and apparent openness to granting Putin’s territorial claims, has unnerved European capitals… Even before Zelensky’s outright rejection of ceding land, Ukraine and its European supporters voiced deep apprehension about Trump’s initiative, which some said originally was so favorable to Russia that they believed it had been drafted by the Kremlin…” 

Merz and Spahn At Odds

Bild Online wrote on December 5: 

“Distrust reigns between the CDU/CSU and the SPD. Many MPs no longer trust their coalition partner… 

“Furthermore, Merz and his parliamentary group leader Jens Spahn have even more opponents within their own ranks as of today. Many MPs resent the way they were pressured before the vote [on the pension issue]…

When Merz falls, will Spahn survive? 

Merz for a Two-State Solution 

ntv wrote on December 7: 

“A meeting between the Chancellor and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is planned. At the meeting, Merz says he wants to promote the implementation of the two-state solution, i.e. the establishment of a Palestinian state alongside Israel. 

“He also wants to call on Israel to provide better humanitarian care for the people in the Gaza Strip. The Chancellor also wants to raise the tense situation in the West Bank…” 

It was only a matter of time before Merz, who proclaimed strong support for Israel, would stab Israel in the back. 

China’s New Warrior Robots 

Interesting Engineering wrote on December 3: 

“China has showcased its new type of military robot during a recent event. The robot is reportedly capable of matching every move of soldiers using artificial intelligence… The new combat robot is claimed to be an effort of China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to develop autonomous combat systems for modern warfare. The Asian giant previously showcased gun-toting robotic dogs… 

“The report revealed that the new robotic system works by having a human operator wear a motion-sensing suit; whatever moves the person makes — punches, defensive maneuvers, or other actions — the robot replicates almost instantly.”

The Bible speaks about 200 million “horsemen” from the Far East invading Europe. Warrior robots seem to play a big part in this number. 

“Listen to the People, President Trump — They Really DO Feel Economic Pain” 

The conservative and Trump-friendly New York Post Editorial Board wrote on December 8: 

“President Donald Trump… needs to be careful: Slamming Democrats’ talk of ‘affordability’ as a ‘con job’… make it seem he doesn’t think people are suffering… [He] must admit the frustration is painfully real: Three-quarters of Americans view the economy negatively, a Fox News survey found last month. That’s up from the 70% who felt that way at the end of Joe Biden’s presidency. 

“Nearly half say Trump’s policies have hurt the economy, vs. just 15% who say they’ve helped… when voters feel pain, they don’t take well to being told they’re just wrong… prices… are still rising, with inflation stuck about 3%; wage growth is also slow, particularly for lower-income workers. 

Trump’s tariffs are partly to blame; for example, new cars, whose prices are significantly affected by import fees, now average a mind-blowing $50,000, per Kelley Blue Book… voters elected him to fix things — and so far they haven’t seen great progress…. 

“Ending wars is great, but pretty distant from the kitchen table. With the midterm elections just 11 months off, Trump can’t afford to ignore [the economy].”

But Trump Is Not Listening!!! 

ABC News wrote on December 9: 

“In a speech the White House billed as President Donald Trump’s kickoff event for a tour around the country focused on his economic agenda ahead of next year’s midterm elections, Trump passed off any blame for high costs onto his predecessor almost a year into his second term. 

“Speaking for nearly an hour and 40 minutes, Trump strayed from the issue of affordability, launching into derogatory language to call out his political opponents, and prompting his supporters into a ‘Send her back’ chant about Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar.” 

“Kill Them All” 

The Ron Paul Institute published on December 4 the following article by Judge Andrew P. Napolitano: 

“When Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth posted a meme of Franklin the Turtle, the amiable child’s cartoon character, in a helicopter using a military weapon to kill people in a small boat below him, and captioned it ‘For your Christmas wish list,’ it understandably caused an uproar. Should the secretary of defense be mocking the people his troops have killed? Should he engage a child’s cartoon character to produce this mockery? Should anyone in his right mindwho professes to understand Christianity, suggest that this killing should be on a child’s Christmas wish list? Should he be killing nonviolent boatpeople?… 

“President Donald Trump has ordered the Department of Defense to annihilate persons in speedboats in the Caribbean Sea, 1,500 miles from the United States and elsewhere. The true targets of these killings are not the boats but the persons in the boats. We know this because the president has stated so, and because in a particularly gruesome event, two survivors of an initial attack on Sept. 2, 2025, who were clinging to the broken remains of their boat hoping to be rescued, were hit with a second attack, which obliterated them… 

“These killings constitute murder under federal law and under international law, and persons who use the force of government to commit murder may themselves be prosecuted for it in US courts, courts of the countries from which their victims came, and in international courts. These killings constitute murder because none of the 81 dead boatpeople was engaged in any violence at the times of their deaths… If the police see a nonviolent person distributing dangerous drugs in an American city, can they summarily kill that person? Of course not… 

“The Washington Post reported that seven sources — seven — informed its reporters that when military personnel saw two boat survivors floating at sea, they asked the chain of command what to do. Under the law, the military had a duty to rescue the folks they tried and failed to murder.

“These seven persons have corroborated that Hegseth verbally ordered that the two survivors be killed — an order he denies having given, but which the White House has confirmed, laughably calling it ‘self-defense.’ That’s when Hegseth posted his macabre, revolting, anti-Christian suggestion of murder for Christmas.” 

On December 4, Newsmax wrote: 

“A Navy admiral told lawmakers Thursday that there was no ‘kill them all’ order… Adm. Frank ‘Mitch’ Bradley ‘was very clear that he was given no such order, to give no quarter or to kill them all…’ said Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark..” 

Both accounts cannot be correct. It is clear that someone is lying. 

Still Justified? 

The Guardian reported on December 5 

“The US admiral who directed an attack on suspected drug smugglers in the Caribbean on 2 September told lawmakers this week that the small boat destroyed by the US military is a series of strikes was moving narcotics to a larger vessel bound for the South American nation of Suriname, not the United States… Suriname is a transit country for South American cocaine [not fentanyl], the majority of which is likely destined for Europe…” 

CNN added on December 6: 

“Bradley argued there was still a possibility the drug shipment could have ultimately made its way from Suriname to the US…, telling lawmakers that justified striking the smaller boat even if it wasn’t directly heading to US shores at the time it was hit…. The new detail adds yet another wrinkle to the Trump administration’s argument that striking the boat multiple times, and killing survivors, was necessary in order to protect the US from an imminent threat… 

“The US military ultimately struck the boat four times—the first time splitting the boat in half and leaving two survivors clinging to a capsized portion…  The second, third and fourth strikes killed them and sunk the vessel. The survivors were also waving at something in the air… although it’s unclear whether they might have been surrendering or asking the US aircraft they had spotted for help.”

Whether legal or not, according to man’s laws, all these actions are sinful and ungodly according to God’s standards. 

Minister of War Pete Hegseth—How the Times Have Changed 

CNN Politics wrote on December 8: 

“In 2016, as then-presidential candidate Donald Trump vowed that US troops would carry out even his most extreme battlefield orders as commander in chief — some of which former military leaders said would be illegal — Pete Hegseth warned that service members had a duty to refuse unlawful orders from a potential President Trump… 

“As a Fox News contributor and former Army National Guard officer, Hegseth was frequently asked to weigh in on Trump’s national security proposals, and in the 2016 appearances he echoed that consensus view: that service members could face criminal consequences for carrying out illegal commands, that the military’s ethos requires refusing such orders, and that military members may have to refuse Trump.” 

What happened? It’s a rhetorical question, of course.

Crazy: Tourists to Provide Social Media History… and More! 

The Sun wrote on December 10: 

“TOURISTS entering America will have their social media histories checked at border control, if the latest Trump administration mandate is enforced.

“The proposed social media screening would apply to all tourists… entering the US, regardless of whether they need a visa or not… 

“Currently,… tourists [on the visa waiver program] do not require a visa to visit the US and instead can complete Electronic System for Travel Authorizations (ESTA).

“The Federal Register notice states it would be mandatory for all foreign tourists to provide data from their social media from the past five years, including email addresses and phone numbers. Names, addresses, numbers and birthdays of family members would also be included in the compulsory information passed to the country’s border force.” 

The New York Times added on December 10: 

“In a document filed on Tuesday in the Federal Register, C.B.P. (Customs and Border Protection) said it plans to require applicants to provide a long list of personal data including social media, email addresses from the last decade, and the names, birth dates, places of residence and birthplaces of parents, spouses, siblings and children.” 

This is totally insane and blatantly illegal 

Insane—Trump’s New Requirements for Tourists

Daily Mail wrote on December 11:

“Overseas travellers… could soon be required to make every post they’ve made on social media in the last five years open to scrutiny, with any hint of anti-American sentiment likely to land them in hot water with border officials.  

“The controversial plan follows other recent proposals, including asking tourists to pay a $15,000 bond to guarantee they won’t overstay their 90-day tourist visas.   

“People entering the US will also be asked to provide email addresses [for the last ten years], phone numbers and information on their family members in order to achieve safe passage…

“Peter Greenberg, aka The Travel Detective, [said] that the US faces losing huge tourist revenue if the plans go ahead. The News Travel Editor at CBS said: ‘They’re proposing up to a $15,000 bond to guarantee that when a visit is over, they don’t extend their visa and they come home. How many people can afford that? Adding to that [the bond] is the new proposal that tourists may have to provide five years of social media history that needs to be inspected. Add those things together and you’ll understand already why there’s been a huge drop in inbound travel to the United States this summer, resulting in lost revenue that can never be recouped.’ 

“To avoid unnecessary waits and checks at the airport, ticking all the admin boxes before you get on the plane will make going through the US border less painful. A spokesperson for ABTA, the UK’s trade organisation for tour operators and travel agents, told the Daily Mail that fans who are determined to make it to the World Cup next summer should apply for… ESTA, now, before booking travel and tickets… ‘If you are unable to get an ESTA you will need to go in person to apply for a visa, which can take some time.’”

If you thought Trump’s crazy immigration policy could not get any crazier, here you go… and, of course, it will contribute to the destruction of the USA.

Birthright Citizenship 

NBC News wrote on December 5: 

“… the Supreme Court on Friday agreed to decide the lawfulness of President Donald Trump’s contentious plan to roll back automatic birthright citizenship for nearly anyone born in the United States… 

“Birthright citizenship has long been understood to be required under the Constitution’s 14th Amendment, which states: ‘All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.’ The language was included in the constitutional amendment enacted after the Civil War to ensure that Black former slaves and their children were recognized as citizens. 

“Legal scholars of all ideological stripes have generally assumed the phrase to be self-explanatory, with the only exceptions being people born to foreign diplomats, invading hostile forces and members of some Native American tribes. But Trump, as part of his immigration crackdown, has sought to unravel that historical understanding, embracing a hitherto fringe theory pushed by anti-immigration activists.”

This time, the Supreme Court is supposed to rule on the merits, unlike last time, when it just ruled evasively on jurisdictional issues [For example, can courts issue nationwide injunctions?]. A decision by the Supreme Court is expected in June. Let us hope that they make the only correct decision in line with the Constitution—to uphold birthright citizenship. 

No More Dual Citizenship? 

It gets crazier and crazier. A bill was introduced by Ohio Republican Senator Bernie Morenoa to ban dual citizenship. That would even apply to Melania and Barron Trump who hold citizenship in the United States and Slovenia. Unfortunately, Germany wants to follow Trump in this respect. 

Bild Online wrote on December 8: 

“A tough legislative initiative in the USA: Dual citizenship is threatened with extinction! If Republican Senator Bernie Moreno has his way, US dual citizens will soon have to relinquish their second passport… Millions of people in the USA would be affected. 

“Leading politicians from the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) now see the planned US model as a blueprint for Germany and want to bring about the end of dual citizenship here as well… BUT: Parts of the ‘plans being discussed in the USA,’ such as the ‘retroactive abolition’ of the already permitted dual passport, would probably be ‘neither constitutionally nor politically feasible’ in Germany.”

Trump’s Gaza “Peace Plan” Falling Apart? 

The Algemeiner wrote on December 8: 

“As the United States pushes for the second phase of President Donald Trump’s Gaza ceasefire to begin, Israel is warning that Qatar and Turkey are trying to shield Hamas from disarmament as the Palestinian terrorist group seeks to reassert control over the war-torn enclave. 

“Qatar and Turkey have proposed alternatives to a central provision of Trump’s peace plan… Rather than requiring Hamas to disarm, Qatari and Turkish officials have pushed for the Islamist group either to hand over its weapons to the Palestinian Authority or place them in secure storage under international oversight. As part of this plan, Qatar and Turkey are reportedly advocating a two-year grace period during which Hamas could legally retain its weapons. 

“However, Israeli officials have rejected these options as unacceptable, arguing they would allow the terrorist group to maintain its influence in Gaza, which Hamas has ruled for nearly two decades. Israel has made clear it will allow Hamas just a few months to give up its weapons, warning it will act unilaterally if the group is not disarmed promptly.

“Turkey and Qatar [have been] longtime backers of Hamas… Israeli officials have repeatedly rejected any Turkish or Qatari involvement in post-war Gaza… 

“Qatar and Turkey are now insisting that Israel must withdraw from Gaza before Hamas can disarm — a demand Jerusalem vehemently opposes, warning it would give the terrorist group time to reassert full control over its half of Gaza and remove any incentive to disarm later on… 

“Since the ceasefire took effect two months ago, Hamas has targeted Palestinians who it labeled as ‘lawbreakers and collaborators with Israel,’ sparking widespread clashes and violence as the group moves to seize weapons and eliminate any opposition. Social media videos widely circulated online show Hamas members brutally beating Palestinians and carrying out public executions of alleged collaborators and rival militia members.” 

This “peace plan,” for which Trump got a “peace prize” from the corrupt FIFA [see below], was doomed to failure from the outset. How one can have Turkey and Qatar participate in the process of establishing peace with terrorists is beyond sanity. Also, one of the wars which Trump allegedly ended, is still ongoing. 

As Reuters reported on December 10: “Thailand and Cambodia traded accusations of targeting civilians in artillery and rocket attacks on Wednesday, as U.S. President Donald Trump said he would try to intervene to stop the fighting and salvage a ceasefire he brokered earlier this year.” The Thai Prime Minister allegedly wrote online that he will no longer negotiate with Trump and will no longer take orders from him. 

Trump’s peace deals collapse one after another. 

The FIFA Gala Turns Into a Bizarre Pandering to Donald Trump 

ntv wrote on December 5: 

“In a bizarre show, ostensibly billed as the World Cup draw for next year’s biggest football tournament of all time, the smitten and self-abasing FIFA boss Gianni Infantino unknowingly gifted the sport to the US president. Trump was canonized that evening. As the peace angel he fancies himself… 

“And Trump was then allowed to participate in his own canonization: He spoke of it as ‘one of the greatest honors of my life.’ He thus elevated the award above the Nobel Peace Prize, which he so desired and which he deserved according to Infantino’s world… 

“Trump praises his relationship with the Canadian Prime Minister. What a joke! Just a few months ago, he wanted to annex Canada as the 51st state… 

“Infantino, of course, personally presents the gigantic trophy! What a sycophantic scene… The man who deployed the National Guard in his own country…” 

Infantino, as the FIFA president, has been controversial for years (according to Die Welt). FIFA—the international federation of football associations—has been embroiled in numerous scandals, not least because of bribery and corruption. Furthermore, many of the controversial rules established by FIFA have long been under attack. FIFA can certainly spoil the enjoyment of the 2026 World Cup in the USA, Canada, and Mexico. But this is always the case when politics gets involved. 

An Act of Cronyism 

Die Welt wrote on December 5:

 “‘A clumsy attempt at pandering by FIFA,’ said ZDF commentator Oliver Schmidt… ‘Has an act of cronyism ever been so blatant, ever so public?’”

An Absolute Spectacle of Horror 

t-online wrote on December 5: 

“This draw will be remembered – unfortunately for all the wrong reasons. This gala in Washington, D.C., was one of the most absurd events in recent sports history. The way football and politics became intertwined, the way FIFA President Gianni Infantino fawned over and flattered US President Donald Trump – it was an absolute spectacle of horror. 

“FIFA has done a lot to lose credibility in recent years. But with this draw, it has outdone itself in a negative way… When Infantino presented Trump with the FIFA Peace Prize, it was clear: things couldn’t get any crazier – or more unpleasant…” 

A Bizarre Ceremony

Express wrote on December 5: 

“Football fans have reacted with fury as Donald Trump plays a major role at the World Cup 2026 draw in Washington. The US president was awarded a peace prize and allowed to take part in the draw, sparking frustration from viewers on social media platform X… 

“One person wrote: ‘…  There was global condemnation & constant crying at Qatar having the World Cup. What we are witnessing with USA & Trump is so comfortably worse & a bigger disgrace for the sport & the globe, but of course, no one will care because it’s the West. Hypocrites…’” 

Shameless 

The Daily Mail wrote on December 5: 

“In a display of sycophancy so cringe-inducing it almost veered beyond satire, Mr Infantino presented President Trump with the award in recognition of his ‘extraordinary actions to promote peace and unity throughout the world’… 

“Yesterday’s draw for the World Cup group stage at the Kennedy Centre in Washington DC often fell flat with a seemingly perplexed crowd and Mr Infantino’s shameless courting of the President…” 

Australian Youth Banned From Social Media 

NBC News wrote on December 9: 

“More than 1 million social media accounts held by users under 16 are set to be deactivated in Australia on Wednesday in a divisive world-first ban that has inflamed a culture war and is being closely watched in the United States and elsewhere. Social media companies will have to take ‘reasonable steps’ to ensure that under-16s in Australia cannot set up accounts on their platforms and that existing accounts are deactivated or removed… 

“Social media companies will be responsible for enforcing the ban, paying fines of up to 49.5 Australian dollars (about $32 million) for serious or repeated breaches. Children and parents will not be punished for any infringements. 

“Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, Facebook, X, Snapchat and Reddit are all set to be age-restricted under the law… All of the platforms have said they will comply…” 

Heading to a Very Dark Place

The Daily Mail published on or about December 6 the following article by Stephen Glover:

“In all sorts of areas this increasingly despised Government is showing a lofty dismissiveness for the rights and concerns of those whom they claim to serve. Tradition is ignored, and established liberties set aside, in the cause of greater efficiency… Look at Labour’s new plans to extend facial recognition technology, which could be deployed in every city, town and village. Under a new consultation launched on Thursday, police could be given access to Britain’s passport database to identify lawbreakers… But do we really want our every movement outside our homes to be monitored by the authorities? Who knows to what uses information garnered in this way might be put by a future government that was positively malign? Even the Home Office admits that live recognition cameras ‘interfere’ with human rights… 

“I feel the same about digital identity cards, which will soon be mandatory for anyone taking a new job. Sir Keir Starmer has told us that they will be useful in preventing illegal immigrants from working. I’ve no doubt we will all have them in the end. Again, greater efficiency is the justification for imposing new restrictions. Most of us would be much happier if Labour found a way of deterring illegal immigrants from coming here in the first place rather than foisting ID cards on us… 

“What makes this Government’s high-handed coercion especially galling is that many of its senior ministers are very far from being morally upright and, in some cases, are fortunate not to have been led away in handcuffs… But then it is precisely because they are not upright that they find it so easy to bully us and tell us what to do, even if that involves stripping us of freedoms which many of us had taken for granted. 

“Nowhere is this more apparent than in the crackdown over free speech. A slew of new laws has made it more difficult for people to speak their minds. The logging of ‘non-crime hate incidents’ – deemed by the police to demonstrate hostility in action or speech – has soared in recent years… more than a third of Britons feel that they have to self-censor their views on race or ethnicity, while 32 per cent said they felt they could not speak freely about immigration or religious extremism. Some 41 per cent hold back their views on transgender issues… 

“With a Government that holds so many of the people in contempt, and a people that comprehensively loathes its Government, we could be heading to a very dark place.” 

Acknowledgement and Disclaimer: 

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

This Week in the News

USA Willing to Give Occupied Regions to Russia? 

The Telegraph wrote on November 28: 

“The United States is poised to recognise Russia’s control over Crimea and other occupied Ukrainian territories to secure a deal to end the war… Donald Trump has sent his peace envoy Steve Witkoff and son-in-law Jared Kushner to make the direct offer to Vladimir Putin in Moscow.

The plan to recognise territory, which breaks US diplomatic convention, is likely to go ahead despite concerns among Ukraine’s European allies.

One well-placed source said: ‘It’s increasingly clear the Americans don’t care about the European position. They say the Europeans can do whatever they want.’… 

“Washington’s apparent offer of recognition has caused concern amongst its European allies, who have repeatedly ruled out backing a peace deal that condones borders being redrawn by force… Until now, the US and Europe have refused to recognise Russia’s control over Crimea, the peninsula that Putin illegally annexed in 2014… 

“In recent days, leaked phone calls showed how Mr Trump’s lead negotiator, Mr Witkoff, was found to have coached Russian officials on how to court the White House… Open source intelligence experts have suggested a European agency could have disclosed this information to expose the blossoming relationship between the presidential aide and the Kremlin…” 

Risk of Major Split 

The Daily Mail added on November 28: 

“The move would mark the most dramatic shift in US policy toward the conflict since Russia seized Crimea in 2014, and risks a major split with European governments that have repeatedly rejected any peace plans involving territorial concessions… 

“European concern has intensified further after leaked recordings revealed Witkoff coaching Russian officials on appealing to the Trump administration. In those calls, he referred to Ukraine needing to give up Donetsk, prompting questions about whether US envoys had already signalled willingness to support Russian demands…”

Europeans would view such an “agreement” with Russia as an American betrayal. No good would come out of it, and the result would be increased anti-American sentiments. 

Preemptive Strikes on Russia? 

The Sun wrote on December 1: 

“RUSSIA has accused Europe of gearing up for ‘major war’ after a top Nato chief claimed the defence pact could launch ‘pre-emptive strikes’ on Vladimir Putin. Moscow hit back at the suggestion, blaming the West for ‘moving towards escalation’… 

“Speculating on Nato’s ability to hit Russia first, [Admiral Giuseppe Cavo] Dragone, [chair of Nato’s Military Committee] said: ‘We are studying everything […] On cyber, we are kind of reactive. Being more aggressive or being proactive instead of reactive is something that we are thinking about.’

“Dragone added that revenge cyber-attacks would be the simplest option, because many Nato member nations hold the capabilities to launch them. Retaliation for physical sabotage or drone incursions would be more complex – but not out of the question. The admiral said that a ‘pre-emptive strike’ could, under certain circumstances, be classified as a defensive action… 

“Nato has already been urged to abandon its reactive stance by several member states – particularly those in eastern Europe which bear the brunt of Russia‘s aggression.” 

Ultimately, this is exactly what will happen, according to biblical prophecy. 

Putin: “If Europe Wants War…” 

Newsmax wrote on December 2:

“Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Tuesday that Russia did not want a war with European powers but that if Europe did want a war, then Russia was ready right now to fight. Putin said that European powers were making demands on a possible peace settlement for Ukraine that Moscow considers absolutely unacceptable. Putin accused Ukraine’s European allies Tuesday of sabotaging U.S.-led efforts to end the war that have gained momentum in recent weeks… thus ‘blocking the entire peace process,’ only to blame Russia for it. ‘That’s their goal,’ Putin said. 

“… European leaders, who fear Russia’s future territorial ambitions and are trying to figure out how they can fund Ukraine’s fight beyond this year, are trying to make their voices heard after being largely sidelined by Washington…” 

Europe Plans “Nuclear Option”? 

Express wrote on December 1: 

“Trump has fuelled fears among European politicians that the White House is preparing to sacrifice the continent’s security in exchange for US economic gain. 

“European states are considering adopting the ‘nuclear option’ of sinking the US economy, if Donald Trump sells out Ukraine and endangers security on the continent… European leaders remain suspicious that Trump is rushing towards a geopolitical deal with Vladimir Putin while paying little heed to the security concerns of NATO allies. 

“The Wall Street Journal reports a European intelligence service has circulated internal assessments about ‘commercial and economic plans’ the Trump team has been exploring with Russia behind closed doors… Sources told the WSJ that European leaders are considering adopting extreme countermeasures in retaliation, designed to unleash economic chaos in the US

“The alleged plan involves dumping trillions in US government debt owned by European states. A rapid sell off would likely cause a crash in the value of the US dollar, create a liquidity crisis across the banking system and cause a huge spike in borrowing costs. It would also lock the American financial sector into a paralysis more severe than the 2008 crisis. 

“A leading European economist [described]… the plan as a potential financial whiplash that could hit the US harder than any external shock in modern history. The political consequences would likely be disastrous for Trump and the Republicans as the midterm elections approach next year. 

“The EU and the UK are among the largest holders of US Treasury securities (US debt), which gives them significant potential economic leverage.

As of December 2024, the United Kingdom holds an estimated $722.7 billion in US debt. The European Union member countries collectively hold an estimated $1.62 trillion. Combined, this is approximately $2.34 trillion, making the EU/UK bloc one of the single largest foreign holders of US debt.” 

This would cause an incurable permanent rift between the two power blocs. 

EU Tells Trump: You Can’t Pardon Putin For War Crimes 

Politico wrote on December 1: 

“Donald Trump’s drive to secure peace in Ukraine must not let Vladimir Putin off the hook for war crimes committed by Russian forces, a top EU official has warned, effectively setting a new red line for a deal… Michael McGrath, the European commissioner for justice and democracy, said negotiators must ensure the push for a ceasefire does not result in Russia escaping prosecution. 

“His comments reflect concerns widely held in European capitals that the original American blueprint for a deal included the promise of a ‘full amnesty for actions committed during the war,’ alongside plans to reintegrate Russia into the world economy. The Trump team’s push to rehabilitate the Kremlin chief comes despite international condemnation of Russia for alleged crimes including the abduction of 20,000 Ukrainian children and attacks targeting civilians…. 

“Ukrainian authorities say they have opened investigations into more than 178,000 alleged Russian crimes since the start of the war… The EU and others have worked to set up a new special tribunal for the crime of aggression with the aim of bringing Russian leaders to justice for the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, which began in February 2022… In March 2023, judges at the International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant for Putin…” 

The different positions between the USA and the EU become more and more obvious. 

Germany to Take Over NATO? 

Newsweek wrote on November 30: 

“Comments by President Donald Trump’s envoy to NATO suggesting that Germany take over the American role of the alliance’s European commander signal Washington’s disengagement from European security affairs…

“[U.S. ambassador to NATO, Matthew] Whitaker’s comments follow rumors the U.S. wants to step back from the role and suggest the Trump administration would like to see Germany replace the U.S. as Europe’s main security guarantor.”

Europe to Hit Back? 

Politico wrote on November 27: 

“Russia’s drones and agents are unleashing attacks across NATO countries and Europe is now doing what would have seemed outlandish just a few years ago: planning how to hit back… 

“After Russian war drones were shot down over Poland, NATO said it would boost the alliance’s drone and air defenses on its eastern flank — a call mirrored by the EU. Even that is enraging Moscow.

“Europeans ‘should be afraid and tremble like dumb animals in a herd being driven to the slaughter,’ said [deputy Kremlin Security Council head Dmitry] Medvedev in early October. ‘They should soil themselves with fear, sensing their near and agonizing end.’… 

“So far, countries like Germany and Romania are strengthening rules that would allow authorities to shoot down drones flying over airports and militarily sensitive objects.” 

Too early yet, but ultimately, Europe will be destroyed by Russia and its Far Eastern allies. 

“Germany Raised Its Citizens to Hate War. Now It Wants Us to Enlist in the Army – But We Say No” 

On November 28, the Guardian published the following opinion by Mithu Sanyal, author, academic and broadcaster based in Düsseldorf: 

“After we lost the second world war – or, as we prefer to say, after we were liberated by the allies – we swore ‘never again’: never again to war, and never again to Auschwitz. Admittedly, Germany rearmed in 1955, but just as ‘citizens in uniform’… For most of my life, the German army didn’t venture beyond our borders. Then came reunification in 1990, and during the first sitting of the all-German Bundestag, the then chancellor, Helmut Kohl, announced that we had to step up internationally: in 1994, the law was changed accordingly to allow the Bundeswehr to be deployed ‘out of area’ again. 

“Nonetheless, Germans remained squeamish about the idea that our soldiers might actually do what they have been trained for… That all changed in 1999. I always try to convey to people outside Germany the seismic shift that occurred that year, when our then foreign minister Joschka Fischer declared we had to let go of ‘never again to war’, in order to honour ‘never again to Auschwitz’ – because Serbia was planning what Fischer called a ‘new Auschwitz’ in Kosovo. Invoking the Holocaust was the only way to get the German public to accept our participation in international wars again. 

“So now we’re bringing back conscription – only we call it voluntary conscription… Even Germany’s Protestant church has been re-evaluating its stance on war and the atom bomb this month… with the following conclusion: in these troubled times, ‘Christian pacifism is ethically not justifiable.’  [What blasphemy!] 

“It is scary how fast this is moving – and some of the details are mind-boggling… A few months ago a prominent German feminist pointed out it was against equal rights that our sons had to go into the army… she went on to ask for conscription for our daughters as well… 

“If we enter the Ukrainian war with manpower…, Patrick Sensburg, president of the Bundeswehr Reservists Association, warned that 1,000 soldiers would die or be seriously maimed every day… One of his main concerns was how to replace 1,000 dead human beings each day. The solution: conscription… 

“Likewise, Chancellor Merz knows he is helping to reconstitute the national mood and set a new agenda when he says: ‘We are not at war. But we are no longer at peace.’ So does nearly every politician and… nearly every journalist in Germany. They are participating in what propaganda researchers call cognitive warfare… 

“I agree the war in Ukraine is a crime – so why aren’t we doing everything in our power to end it?…  a country that isn’t doing everything to prevent wars has lost the right to ask its citizens to participate in them. 

“Most Germans under 30 are against conscription– and it’s only Germans that are too old to go to war that are in favor…” 

Very important and CORRECT article. Yes, Germans are being induced by the political establishment and the mass media to love to go to war again… slowly but surely. 

Defense Talks Between Britain and EU Break Down

Vocal Media wrote on November 28: 

“For months, the United Kingdom and the European Union have tried to build a new foundation for defence cooperation. Both sides hoped that, even after Brexit, they could still work together on issues that affect the entire continent—security, technology, and military readiness. But this hope took a serious hit when Britain officially announced that talks to join the EU Defence Fund (EDF) had broken down… 

“Billions of euros are set aside for this fund, and companies from member states can apply for major contracts. If Britain had joined the EDF, its defence industries could have benefited from these opportunities… However, joining the EDF as a non-EU country is complicated. Unlike NATO, the EDF is tightly controlled by the EU, and it requires strict adherence to the bloc’s regulations, data-sharing rules, and research guidelines. This is where the talks began to fall apart… 

“The most important disagreement was about control and decision-making. The EU wanted Britain to follow its rules without giving the U.K. much influence over how the fund operates… 

‘Another conflict involved technology sharing. EU leaders were cautious about allowing a non-member state access to sensitive military research. They worried that sharing information widely—even with a trusted partner—could weaken security or give other countries an advantage.

“The third major issue was political trust, which still hasn’t fully recovered after Brexit…

“In the end, neither side was willing to compromise enough to reach an agreement. As a result, the talks officially collapsed… many analysts believe the U.K. has lost a valuable chance to shape Europe’s defence future… the breakdown marks a disappointing moment in post-Brexit security efforts…” 

“Britain Quits EU Rearmament Deal After £5.7 Billion Demand from France” 

Express wrote on November 29:

“The programme is set to provide up to €150 billion (£130 billion) in long-term loans to member states for defence spending and large-scale investments.

“SAFE [“Security Action for Europe”] is based on EU loans, and French President Emmanuel Macron insisted that the UK must make high contributions to participate in the scheme. A source claimed that the UK was not prepared to pay significantly into the programme and offered a figure lower than £1 billion…

“It is reported that 19 of the 27 EU countries have applied for SAFE loans so far… The money is expected to be issued early next year, with Poland set to receive the highest share with €43.7 billion. Meanwhile, Romania will receive €16.6 billion, with Hungary and France each given €16.2 billion.”

SAFE and EDF refer to multiple different programs and entities, but they are generally not the same program. The acronyms have distinct meanings in different contexts.  

The European Defence Fund (EDF) is an EU initiative to fund cooperative defense research and capability development, which builds on earlier initiatives. The Security Action for Europe (SAFE) is an EU financial instrument providing support to Member States for urgent defense investments. 

Costco Sues Trump Over Tariffs

CNBC wrote on December 1:

“Costco sued the Trump administration [on Friday] to get a full refund of new tariffs it paid so far this year, and to block those import duties from continuing to be collected from the retail warehouse club giant as a Supreme Court case plays out… Costco said that it risks losing the money it has already paid to satisfy the tariffs even if the Supreme Court eventually upholds earlier lower court rulings that found President Donald Trump did not have the legal power to impose those duties.

“The company noted a looming Dec. 15 deadline that could prevent the tariffs that it has already paid on an estimated basis from being refunded… Dozens of other companies have filed similar lawsuits to protect their right to potential refunds in case the Supreme Court rules against the [tariffs]… 

“The Trump administration has warned of the potential fallout of having to refund hundreds of millions of dollars in tariffs if the Supreme Court upholds the lower court rulings that Trump did not have authority… to unilaterally impose those duties.’

Trump Is Going Way Too Far

On November 28, the Ron Paul Institute published the following article by Eric Margolis:

“President Donald Trump threatens to hang military officers who have the audacity to tell their troops not to obey unlawful orders. Trump called them ‘traitors’ and suggested they be locked up. The president just crossed the Rubicon… after these threats, he has gone way too far. Americans should be alarmed.

“I enlisted in the US Army in 1969 to become an infantry officer and served in Vietnam… In basic and advanced infantry training at Fort Dix, New Jersey, we were educated in the military code of conduct… The most important single lesson that I vividly recall was the order to refuse any orders seen as illegal – that is, in violation of US law and the Geneva Conventions. This command did not come out of the blue. It was promulgated as a result of the Nuremberg Trials after World War II in which much of the senior German elite was found guilty of war crimes, and many sentenced to death.

“Most of the German officials and soldiers being tried for assorted war crimes claimed they were simply following orders from senior commanders… The Nuremberg Trials were in many ways legalized revenge on a defeated enemy. Particularly so when the victorious allies included the US Air force and RAF who had killed millions of civilians in Europe and Japan, and the Soviets who had killed millions more innocent civilians. 

“Nuremberg was a gigantic kangaroo court, and legalized revenge killings. But the one good thing that came out of it was the rejection of the ‘I was only following orders’ defense. All wars are a crime, but this new statute slightly reduced some of the horrors and murder involved. 

“President Trump now wants to sweep this protection away because he feels his regal authority powers have been challenged. This is a violation of our constitution and laws… It’s too bad Donald Trump managed to evade military service… or he would have a better understanding of this important issue and the legal and customary restraints imposed on his noble office.” 

But what about those under him, supporting him, who served in the military? They undoubtedly should know better. 

Trump’s Mental Decline? 

Mediaite published on November 28 the following opinion by Michael Luciano: 

“President Donald Trump’s spiral into a vicious – and malicious – mental decline continued apace on Thanksgiving, capping off an especially erratic month in which he somehow managed to be even less ‘presidential’ than before. 

“Trump, 79, has displayed increasingly antisocial behavior. This month, he called a reporter ‘piggy’ to her face. Last week, he claimed that six Democratic lawmakers who urged soldiers to ‘refuse illegal orders’ had committed sedition… [He] reposted a post stating, ‘HANG THEM.’ On Wednesday, the president ranted about ‘Somalians’ after an Afghan national… was arrested in connection with the shooting of two West Virginia National Guard members in Washington, D.C., one of whom has died. 

“… he erupted at another female reporter… Trump told the reporter, ‘You’re a stupid person.’

“… Trump took to Truth Social, where he railed against Somalis again and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz (D), whom he called ‘seriously retarded’ and claimed that the country’s foreign-born population is composed mostly of people who ‘are on welfare, from failed nations, or from prisons, mental institutions, gangs, or drug cartels.’ The president also baselessly claimed that Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN), an immigrant who is one of a notable contingent of Somalis in Minnesota, ‘probably’ entered the U.S. illegally and married her brother: ‘… her place of origin is a decadent, backward, and crime ridden nation, which is essentially not even a country for lack of Government, Military, Police, schools, etc…’ 

“Trump’s… actions of late… are well beyond the pale. And this is to say nothing of his actual policies, which have had disastrous and deadly consequences for millions of people in the U.S. and abroad.” 

However, according to India Today, dated November 28, “There is… no proof that Omar, the first Somali-American in Congress, ever married a relative or committed immigration fraud. Trump… also did not elaborate on his bizarre claims… A report in the UK’s Daily Mail claimed that Omar confided to her friends that Elmi was actually her biological brother and the marriage was a scam for immigration purposes.” 

The Huffington Post wrote on November 28:

“Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (D) hit back pointedly at Donald Trump on Thursday, responding to the president’s latest online attack of him with a four-word challenge: ‘Release the MRI results.’…  Walz’s response referenced the recent presidential medical mystery of Trump’s MRI scan in October that neither he nor the White House have fully explained.” 

Trump’s MRI Not About His Brain 

Daily Mail wrote on December 1:

“The White House has provided details of Donald Trump’s MRI scan carried out last month amid mounting speculation about the president’s health… after it was revealed in July that he had been diagnosed with chronic venous insufficiency… Trump’s cognitive health has also been called into question… 

“However, Trump’s scans were focused on the president’s heart and abdomen [not his brain], the White House confirmed on Monday…. Trump’s scan revealed no abnormalities and confirmed that he is in ‘excellent health.’ MRI scans are a standard preventative procedure for men his age, the doctor said.”

 As we pointed out in last week’s Current Events, there is great concern, shared by some of Trump’s relatives, that he might be suffering from increasing dementia. 

Attack on Two National Guard Members 

MSN wrote on November 28:

“The man suspected of shooting two National Guard members near the White House this week — one of them fatally — is an Afghan national who came to the United States in September 2021 because of his work with the U.S. government, including the CIA…. [He] was among tens of thousands of Afghan nationals who came to the U.S. as part of Operation Allies Welcome, a Biden-era program, following the chaotic U.S. military withdrawal…  [He] was granted asylum this April [under the Trump administration]… 

“CIA Director John Ratcliffe said [the suspect] had been a member of a partner force in Kandahar, a province in southern Afghanistan that saw significant fighting during the war. [He] was part of one of the CIA’s ‘Zero Units’ that were involved in combat missions to seize or kill suspected terrorists… The Zero Units, also known as National Strike Units, were involved in dangerous and often deadly night raids and other missions to kill or capture members of the Taliban, al-Qaeda, the Islamic State and other terrorist groups. The CIA and U.S. military provided intelligence and logistical support to the squads. 

“The CIA has never publicly acknowledged its work with the Zero Units, which have been shadowed by allegations of human rights violations, including a 2019 Human Rights Watch report that found they had conducted summary executions and other abuses. [The suspect] and other Afghan paramilitary members would have undergone extensive vetting before joining the Zero Units and were supposed to be monitored closely once in service, people familiar with the matter said.

“U.S. officials have said the Zero Units were effective fighters and that they played a critical role in assisting with the chaotic American evacuation from Afghanistan in late August 2021, probably saving U.S. lives.” 

CIA’s Zero Units 

The New York Times added on November 28: 

“Zero Units, which were formally part of the Afghan intelligence service but operated outside the usual chain of command, were largely recruited, trained, equipped and overseen by the C.I.A., according to Human Rights Watch. These units specialized in night raids and clandestine missions; Taliban officials and human rights groups described them as ‘death squads.’

“Human Rights Watch said it had documented several instances in which the units were responsible for ‘extrajudicial executions and enforced disappearances, indiscriminate airstrikes, attacks on medical facilities, and other violations of international humanitarian law.’

“A childhood friend, who asked to be identified only as Muhammad because he feared Taliban reprisals, said that [the suspect] had suffered from mental health issues and was disturbed by the casualties his unit had caused.”

Trump said about the suspect that he had turned “nuts.” And Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem said that authorities believe the suspect might have been radicalized after he arrived in the United States.

npr wrote on November 27:

“Those people came on two-year grants of parole, then later had to apply for other ways to stay in the country permanently, like asylum, and go through rigorous screening. 

“Roughly 200,000 Afghan immigrants and refugees came to the U.S. after the fall of Kabul to the Taliban in August 2021. Some of them have since received green cards or even U.S. citizenship, but many have more tenuous legal status, such as humanitarian parole.” 

The Blame Game Continues 

New York Post wrote on November 27: 

“An enraged Attorney General Pam Bondi blasted ‘progressive left idiots’ for fueling hatred towards National Guard troops — as she vowed to probe whether they encouraged the Thanksgiving eve shooting ambush. 

“Bondi tore into the scores of liberal lawmakers and media commentators who have criticized President Trump’s decision to deploy federal troops to Washington, DC, suggesting the ‘disgusting’ and ‘despicable’ rhetoric is to blame for any ensuing violence.” 

In the case of the suspect, such “rhetoric” was hardly the motive, from everything we know so far. Bondi seems to try to gloss over her unpopularity, by “seizing the moment.” 

Trump’s Announcement of Further Immigration Restrictions 

ABC News wrote on November 28: 

President Donald Trump said he will ‘permanently pause migration’ from some countries following the shooting of two National Guard members in Washington, D.C., earlier this week… Trump did not specify which countries the pause would affect, saying it would apply to ‘Third World Countries.’… 

‘He said the U.S. would ‘terminate all of the millions of Biden illegal admissions… and remove anyone who is not a net asset to the United States, or is incapable of loving our Country, end all Federal benefits and subsidies to noncitizens of our Country, denaturalize migrants who undermine domestic tranquility, and deport any Foreign National who is a public charge, security risk, or non-compatible with Western Civilization.’” 

If this is meant to be taken seriously, these would be extremely dangerous and troublesome announcements by an irate and out-of-touch President. If attempted to be carried out, a flood of lawsuits would be the consequence, and the world would turn even more hostile toward America. Pretty soon, Trump would have been successful in making America void and empty… no more foreign-born non-citizens; no more birthright citizenship; denaturalization of everyone who dares to disagree with Trump’s view of compatibility with Western Civilization; and so on. 

Immigration Applications on Hold 

The New York Post wrote on December 3: 

“The Trump administration formally halted immigration applications from 19 countries deemed to be a high risk for producing terrorists and other national security threats — hours after a source told The Post that list could grow to 30 nations or more…   

 “US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)… also announced a hold on ‘all pending asylum applications, regardless of the alien’s country of nationality.’”

Killings of Alleged “Drug Smugglers” to Be Investigated 

The Washington Post wrote on November 29: 

“The head of the Republican-led Senate Armed Services Committee has pledged ‘vigorous oversight’ after a Washington Post report that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth gave spoken order to kill crew members during the first U.S. strike against suspected drug smugglers in the Caribbean earlier this year. 

“A live drone feed showed two survivors from the original crew of 11 clinging to the wreckage of their boat following the initial missile attack on Sept. 2, The Post reported on Friday afternoon. The Special Operations commander overseeing the operation then ordered a second strike to comply with Hegseth’s directive, according to two people with direct knowledge of the operation, killing both survivors. Those people, along with five others in the original report, spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the matter’s sensitivity. 

“Late Friday, Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Mississippi), the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, and Sen. Jack Reed (D-Rhode Island), the committee’s ranking Democrat, issued a statement saying that the committee ‘is aware of recent news reports — and the Department of Defense’s initial response — regarding alleged follow-on strikes on suspected narcotics vessels.’ The committee, they said, ‘has directed inquiries to the Department, and we will be conducting vigorous oversight to determine the facts related to these circumstances.’ 

“Following the publication of The Post’s report, Hegseth wrote on X that ‘these highly effective strikes are designed to be “lethal, kinetic strikes,’” adding: ‘Every trafficker we kill is affiliated with a Designated Terrorist Organization.’ ‘Our current operations in the Caribbean are lawful under both U.S. and international law, with all actions in compliance with the law of armed conflict — and approved by the best military and civilian lawyers, up and down the chain of command,’ he said… 

“In some closed-door briefings to lawmakers, the Pentagon has declined to bring lawyers who could help explain the legal rationale behind the strikes. There has been extensive frustration among some members of Congress — including some Republicans — at the lack of detail provided to Capitol Hill, ranging from the intelligence to support the strikes to the identities of the people killed. 

“Last month, Wicker and Reed made public two letters they previously sent to the Pentagon, requesting the orders, recordings and legal rationale related to the strikes. The Defense Department, they wrote in the rare public warning, had surpassed the time required by law to provide some of the materials. That information would have included Hegseth’s order to kill everyone in the first strike and the video of the attack… some current and former U.S. officials and law-of-war experts have said that the Pentagon’s lethal campaign — which has killed more than 80 people to date — is unlawful and may expose those most directly involved to future prosecution… 

“The Joint Special Operations Command had said in briefing materials provided to the White House that the purpose of the ‘double-tap’ strike was to sink the boat to avoid any navigation hazard to other vessels, according to one person who saw the report. Lawmakers received a similar explanation in two closed-door briefings, according to two congressional aides. ‘The idea that wreckage from one small boat in a vast ocean is a hazard to marine traffic is patently absurd, and killing survivors is blatantly illegal,’ Rep. Seth Moulton (D-Massachusetts) wrote… ‘Mark my words: It may take some time, but Americans will be prosecuted for this, either as a war crime or outright murder.’” 

Some even question whether these attacks on boats take place, calling it “fake news.” How ignorant can one be! 

Second Strike in “Self-Defense”?

The Independent wrote on December 1:

“The White House has confirmed that the admiral overseeing U.S. military operations against alleged drug-carrying boats had issued the order for a second strike that killed two survivors, an attack that has intensified legal scrutiny into the Trump administration’s lethal campaign… 

“Asked to clarify whether [Defense Secretary Pete] Hegseth had ordered the second strike on the boat, [White House press secretary Karoline] Leavitt told reporters that [Admiral Frank] Bradley — not Hegseth — gave the order and stressed that the veteran naval officer was ‘well within his authority and the law’ when he did. ‘He directed the engagement to ensure the boat was destroyed and the threat from narco terrorists was eliminated,’ she said… The strike on September 2, the first among more than a dozen attacks that have killed more than 80 people in recent months, ‘was conducted in self-defense to protect Americans’ and ‘vital United States interests,’ she said… When two survivors emerged from the wreckage, Bradley issued an order to comply with Hegseth’s alleged instructions to ‘kill everybody’… 

“According to the Pentagon’s own Law of War Manual, people who are ‘wounded, sick, or shipwrecked’ on the high seas are supposed to be ‘respected and protected in all circumstances’ by U.S. forces, even during hostilities. The Defense Department’s manual specifically states that ‘making them the object of attack is strictly prohibited.’” 

Acting in self-defense? This is the most ridiculous “justification” anyone could come up with. 

“Hegseth Throws Admiral Under the Bus” 

Mediaite wrote on December 1: 

“Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth made clear that he believes Admiral Frank ‘Mitch’ Bradley is the man responsible for a U.S. attack on the survivors of a boat bombing in the Caribbean. 

“On Sept. 2, the U.S. bombed an alleged drug boat off the coast of Trinidad. According to The Washington Post, Hegseth ordered everyone aboard killed, according to sources familiar with the situation. After the first strike, which was conducted by the Navy, two survivors remained, clinging to the wreckage. Heeding Hegseth’s directive, the Post said Bradly deemed the survivors valid targets and ordered that Hegseth’s directive be carried out. The Navy conducted a second strike and killed the survivors… 

“On Monday night, Hegseth tweeted ‘support’ of Bradley while also making sure to say that the admiral was responsible for ‘combat decisions’… Fox News Chief Political Analyst Brit Hume… wrote: ‘How to point the finger at someone while pretending to support him.’… Hume said on Fox News that the story could be ‘a big problem’ for the Trump administration. 

“Over on CNN, Ryan Goodman, former general counsel for the Department of Defense, stated that if Hegseth ordered everyone on the boat killed, the secretary is ultimately responsible for the second strike, regardless of Bradley’s involvement…” 

He certainly would be. 

It was also pointed out that during his time in office, President Barack Obama significantly expanded the use of drone strikes for targeted killings against suspected terrorists, particularly in Pakistan, Yemen, and the Horn of Africa. 

How can something like this be possibly justified? 

Prosecuting Hegseth? 

Mediaite wrote on December 2: 

“Newsmax’s senior judicial analyst, Judge Andrew Napolitano, argued on Tuesday that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth should be prosecuted for a war crime over his order to kill everyone aboard an alleged drug smuggling boat in early September… 

“‘Well, I wish the White House would reveal to us the laws on which the president is relying. He says he has an opinion from the Justice Department, but neither the Justice Department nor the White House will offer it for public scrutiny… The killing is out of hand. And this last one, in which Pete Hegseth first denied that he gave the order, and then the White House said he did give the order, and then the White House said it was in self-defense. Self-defense! You got two people in the ocean clinging to a burning boat to stay alive, and they’re gonna be killed for self-defense? That doesn’t make any sense. 

“‘… the law of armed conflict says survivors have to be rescued. They can’t be killed. That’s very clear. It’s in the Uniform Code of Military Justice, and it’s in federal law…  narco terrorist is not a legal term. It’s a political term and using that political term does not justify [killing them]… only if they’re engaged in violence can the military kill them…’ 

“When asked whether they act violently ‘if they’re coming here with drugs that could kill Americans,’ Napolitano replied, ‘Well, they’re fifteen hundred miles from the United States on a speed boat with a fifty-mile distance. It’s inconceivable it could reach the United States.’” 

ABC News added on December 3: 

“The family of a Colombian fisherman who died in a U.S. military boat strike in September has filed a formal complaint with the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights alleging the U.S. government illegally killed him… While the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights can investigate the complaint and issue findings, any ruling it makes would not be legally binding on the U.S…. 

“The filing comes after [far-left] Colombian President Gustavo Petro accused the U.S. government of committing murder… ‘Fisherman Alejandro Carranza had no ties to the drug trade and his daily activity was fishing… The Colombian boat was adrift and displaying the distress signal due to having an outboard motor…’” 

No Evidence 

Breitbart wrote on December 2: 

During an interview aired on Tuesday’s broadcast of Bloomberg’s ‘Balance of Power,’ Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) stated that there isn’t any evidence of fentanyl coming from Venezuela… ‘All these people [are] going off saying, oh, fentanyl’s killing people, I know people who died of fentanyl. I have a great deal of sympathy. I know a family that lost two sons to fentanyl. I have sympathy for that. There’s no evidence there’s any fentanyl on this boat. There’s no evidence that any fentanyl comes from Venezuela, zero.’ 

“He continued, ‘There is fentanyl coming up [from] Mexico, but since we’re blowing these boats up, maybe we’re taking our eye off the border in Mexico. So, the whole thing is a pretense and a prelude to war in Venezuela, and I hope it doesn’t happen.’” 

He also said this in regard to pardoning former President of Honduras Juan Orlando Hernández

“‘if they label you a narcoterrorist, they can kill you without trial, but if they say you’re not a narcoterrorist, you can be given a pardon, even though you have been convicted, even though he’s gloated over all the people he’s loaded with drugs, including some who have probably and inevitably have died in our country… you get into the lunacy of, well, Orlando Hernández is not a narcoterrorist, but these guys, who we don’t know their name, and we’ve presented no proof, they’re narcoterrorists.’” 

Pardoning Drug Smuggler, While Attacking “Drug Smugglers” 

The Ron Paul Institute wrote on December 1: 

“Trump’s South America policy is getting more ridiculous by the day. Yesterday he announced a pardon for the former president of Honduras, Juan Orlando Hernández, who is serving a 45-year sentence for partnering with drug traffickers who had allegedly shipped 400 tons of cocaine to the United States… 

“While pardoning a convicted drug smuggler on one day Trump uses the next one to threatening Venezuela for alleged drug smuggling for which there is no evidence… All Trump assertions about Venezuela, its alleged ‘terrorist gangs’ and drug smuggling are completely bogus. This is not at all about drugs but about stealing the huge oil reserve Venezuela has: ‘[Oil] is at the heart of the matter,’ Colombian President Gustavo Petro told CNN in an interview published Wednesday… ‘He’s not thinking about the democratization of Venezuela, let alone the narco-trafficking,’ added the South American president, who last month was sanctioned by the Trump administration… 

“Meanwhile the U.S. military continues to strike random fisherman [sic] near Venezuela… with drones and missiles… Some current and former U.S. officials and law-of-war experts have said that the Pentagon’s lethal campaign — which has killed more than 80 people to date — is unlawful and may expose those most directly involved to future prosecution. Hegseth had overruled the most senior military lawyer of the U.S. Southern Command who had called the strikes illegal… 

“Eleven people in a boat is by the way a sure sign that these were not drug smuggler [sic]… The boat in question, a go-fast vessel with four motors, is common in the region and would typically be manned by a small crew — perhaps one mechanic, a driver or two, and another person focused on security… More people on board means less room for drugs to sell…’” 

US Attack on Venezuela Imminent? 

The Telegraph wrote on November 29: 

“Donald Trump has told all airlines to consider the skies above and surrounding Venezuela closed, as the threat of US air strikes intensifies. The US president declared Venezuelan airspace ‘closed in its entirety’ in an early-morning post on social media, two days after suggesting he would launch military strikes on the country [“very soon”] to stop drug traffickers. 

“The US does not have the authority to close another country’s airspace, but the threat is likely to panic airlines, cause travel uncertainty in Venezuela, and worry Nicolas Maduro, its leader, whom the Trump administration has labelled a ‘narco-terrorist’…. 

“Despite the president’s declaration, US authorities have not banned American aircraft from entering Venezuelan airspace and flights were still going ahead as of Saturday morning… Since September, the Trump administration has been massing the most significant US military force in the southern Caribbean region for generations, while conducting deadly strikes on suspected drug-smuggling vessels in international waters…”

China To Invade Taiwan? 

The Daily Mail published on November 29 an article by Ian Williams, author of “The Rise And Fall Of The Chinese Economy”: 

“If China attacked its neighbour, [Taiwan] the threat to the global economy and to the bruised Western alliance would make Russia’s long war in Ukraine look like a picnic. And although it is half a world away, the UK could be drawn more directly to a conflict in Taiwan than to the muddy fields of the Donbas. 

“Taiwan is a vital cog in the global high-tech economy. It produces more than 90 per cent of the world’s most advanced semi-conductors. One Taiwanese company, Hon Hai Precision Industry Co, also known as Foxconn, is the world’s biggest electronics manufacturer, including of most Apple products. Bloomberg Economics has estimated that a war over the island would cost the global economy around $10trillion (£7.56trillion) – about 10 per cent of the world’s GDP.

“For years, America has been supporting Taiwan’s defences and bolstering regional alliances to deter Chinese aggression. Now, not only has Donald Trump ushered in a new era of unpredictability, but his counterpart Xi Jinping is growing increasingly impatient, stepping up his military intimidation of the democratic, self-ruled island, which China claims as its own.

Xi sees taking Taiwan as a key part of his mission to restore national greatness, an eerily similar mission to that of his ‘good friend’ Vladimir Putin, which drives the Russian dictator’s aggression on Ukraine. Xi is closely watching the West’s faltering resolve in Ukraine. If Putin is rewarded with territory for his aggression, that will factor into Beijing’s calculations.

“This is why a phone call between Xi and Trump this week attracted so much attention and raised questions about America’s commitment both to the defence of Taiwan and to its regional alliances. The Americans say the call came from Xi, while Beijing claims Trump initiated it. The US President says ‘many topics’ were discussed, while China insists the focus was Taiwan… According to Chinese reports, Xi reminded Trump that the US and China had jointly fought ‘fascism and militarism’ during the Second World War. The message was clear: if Trump wants better relations with Beijing, he should… allow China to have its way with Taiwan.

“No doubt Xi will also have watched Trump’s attempts to wash his hands of Ukraine by foisting on Kyiv a peace plan that largely gives Moscow what it wants. Xi must be calculating that this transactional American President could similarly be persuaded to abandon Taiwan as part of a mutually beneficial trade deal…

“Xi will have noted the way Putin has been able to play Trump like a fiddle, and there should be no surprise that the Chinese leader wants to join that orchestra.” 

Levites Sing Psalms on the Temple Mount 

Israel 365 News wrote on November 28: 

“The silence that has hung over the Temple Mount for nearly two thousand years was broken Thursday morning when three Levites ascended Judaism’s holiest site and sang the daily psalm. The moment marks an unprecedented restoration of an ancient Temple service that ceased with the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE… 

“The Bible assigns the Levites a specific role in Temple worship. In the book of Chronicles, King David organizes the Levitical singers: ‘David and the commanders of the army set apart for the service the sons of Asaph, Heman, and Jeduthun, who prophesied with lyres, harps, and cymbals’ (1 Chronicles 25:1). This wasn’t merely ceremonial music. The Sages teach that Levitical song was an essential component of the Temple service itself, so integral that sacrifices offered without it were considered incomplete…

“The Levites performed various functions in the Temple including guarding and serving all the musical needs.  

“Jewish communities are scrupulous about perpetuating the status of the Levites, which is passed from father to son. Only Jewish men whose fathers were Levites are considered eligible. Comprising about 4% of the total Jewish population, they are recognized for conspicuous honors in religious services and their status as Levites is inscribed on their gravestones…” 

Acknowledgement and Disclaimer: 

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

This Week in the News 

Trump’s New “Peace Plan” for Ukraine 

ABC News wrote on November 21: 

“The [US] military delegation arrived Wednesday into a capital in turmoil [Kyiv], as a corruption scandal estimated by investigators to involve some $100 million forced the dismissal of two cabinet ministers… As the scandal swirled, the White House has presented Ukraine with a new 28-point peace plan drawn up in coordination with Moscow that contains conditions that are widely seen in Ukraine as effectively demanding the country’s capitulation… 

“The plan includes a number of maximalist demands that the Kremlin has long demanded and that have been previously dismissed as non-starters for Kyiv, including that Ukraine cut its armed forces by more than half and cede swaths of territory not yet occupied by Russia… Ukraine would also be forbidden from possessing long-range weapons, while Moscow would retain virtually all the territory it has occupied — and receive some form of recognition of its 2014 seizure of Crimea under the latest proposed U.S. plan… 

“Zelenskyy — whom Trump previously framed as illegitimate and in March said was without ‘the cards’ needed for peace negotiations with Russia — already appeared to be on shaky ground in recent days as the corruption scandal widened, with opposition parties and even figures within his own Servant of the People party calling for a major governmental shakeup. 

“Now he will also have to juggle that scandal along with the new U.S. peace drive. In Ukraine, some observers have suggested the Trump administration has chosen the moment deliberately, hoping a vulnerable Zelenskyy can be forced into accepting unfavorable terms…. 

“Zelenskyy has not been personally implicated in what is perhaps the country’s most serious corruption scandal of the war. The president has vowed ‘a swift and just response’ to any wrongdoing.” 

Newsmax wrote on November 19: 

“While Ukraine would view the deal as a major surrender to Russia, the White House believes Ukraine would likely lose the territory anyway [parts of eastern Ukraine they don’t occupy]… The deal would call for Russia to control the Donbas region, even though Ukraine controls 14.5% of the territory there.” 

Zelenskyy Reacts 

BBC wrote on November 21:

 “Addressing the nation on Friday, Zelensky said Ukraine ‘might face a very difficult choice: either losing dignity, or risk losing a key partner’, [USA] adding that ‘today is one of the most difficult moments in our history’… 

“Ukraine is critically dependent on deliveries of US-made advanced weaponry, including air defence systems to repel deadly Russian air assaults, as well as intelligence provided by Washington…. 

“In his 10-minute address in front of the presidential office in Kyiv, Zelensky warned that Ukraine would face ‘a lot of pressure… to weaken us, to divide us’, adding that ‘the enemy is not sleeping’… 

“Trump warned that Ukraine would lose more territory to Russia ‘in a short amount of time’.” 

Witkoff to See a Psychiatrist? 

Welt Online wrote on November 21: 

“European diplomats and government officials are reacting angrily to new details of the US peace plan intended to end the war in Ukraine… One EU government representative resorted to crude language to express his dismay. A leading EU politician said: ‘Witkoff needs to see a psychiatrist.’… 

“The Europeans assured Zelenskyy that they remain committed to a ‘just’ peace, according to a statement released after the talks. ‘They agreed that any agreement affecting European states, the European Union, or NATO requires the approval of European partners or a consensus among the allies,’ the statement said.” 

Farage Objects 

Express wrote on November 22: 

“Reform UK leader Mr Farage has now taken to X to make his feelings clear on the Ukraine peace plan from Mr Trump…  He wrote: ‘Ukraine being asked to halve the size of its Army is unacceptable…’ 

“Mr Farage’s remarks come as a rare public rebuke of the US President. They represent a significant strengthening of his support for Ukraine, against attempts by the Labour Party to cast him as sympathetic to Russia’s leader Vladimir Putin.” 

Trump Causes Earthquake 

t-online wrote on November 22: 

“US President Donald Trump has effectively derailed the G20 summit [in South Africa] – despite the US’s non-participation… Trump’s Ukraine plan has sent shockwaves through the G20. Europeans met in Johannesburg on Saturday morning to coordinate a common approach to the US plan. They consider the development alarming. Europe was not involved in the negotiations with Russia, and Trump acted behind their backs. 

“European diplomats agree: Neither Ukraine nor the Europeans can actually approve Trump’s plan. They see it as a declaration of surrender that fulfills all of Russia’s war aims. Kremlin chief Vladimir Putin could use it to launch another attack in a few years to seize the rest of a then-disarmed Ukraine. In a statement issued early Saturday afternoon, several European states, along with Canada and Japan, rejected the plan in its current form… 

“Despite the clear rejection of Trump’s plan by all of Ukraine’s supporters, there is still considerable agitation in South Africa. This is because the central goal of both Ukraine and the Europeans is apparently to avoid completely alienating Trump. They are suppressing their anger at the US president, hoping that he will ultimately remain involved in the war in Ukraine in some way. Kremlin chief Vladimir Putin, however, will likely reject any alternative plan proposed by the Europeans. Why should Moscow accept something that, in all likelihood, is worse for Putin than the US offer? 

“To prevent the worst, the Europeans are, as usual, doing what a British television reporter in Johannesburg described on Saturday as ‘Trump-pleasing.’ This involves examining Trump’s plans very seriously, even though it is clear that the consequences for the West, excluding the US, would be catastrophic…” 

“That’s why Chancellor Friedrich Merz was surprisingly clear in a press statement during the G20 summit… If Trump doesn’t adjust his plan, he’ll be on his own from Thursday onward – or on Putin’s side. Whether the Europeans are prepared for the consequences of a break with the Americans, Merz left open on Saturday. 

“One thing is certain: the strategy of keeping the US president at the table at all costs is reaching its limits. Merz and the Europeans are increasingly frustrated. Trump wants peace at any price – he doesn’t care how sustainable and beneficial this peace is for Europe… 

“But the headaches of many Western states extend far beyond the Ukraine issue. Early on at the G20 summit in Johannesburg, it was clear: Trump is one of the greatest dangers of our time – also because political assurances from Washington can hardly be relied upon anymore…”
The inevitable separation between Europe and the USA is clearly on the horizon. 

“A Disaster for Europe”

Bild Online published the following commentary by Roman Elchinger on November 21: 

“The US peace plan for Ukraine reads as if it were conceived by Putin himself. If it is truly meant seriously, it would amount to a declaration of surrender for Kyiv and be a disaster for Europe… Such a ‘peace’ would be practically an invitation to the next war for Putin. There are plenty of parallels in history – from the ‘Munich Agreement,’ which was intended to appease Hitler, to Putin’s virtually inconsequential invasion of Crimea. 

“But the truth is also this: We can’t complain about the EU being ignored. Those who are so militarily weak that their security depends on Trump’s USA simply don’t have a seat at the table when the new world order is being discussed. The lesson after almost four years of war in Ukraine is therefore not new, but unfortunately all the more urgent: Europe must become a military power – preferably with its own Army.” 

A European NATO Because of America’s Unreliability? 

Compact wrote on November 23: 

“A prominent Christian Democrat [CSU politician Manfred Weber, chairman of the influential EPP group in the European Parliament] is calling for the EU to be transformed into a military alliance because the US… can no longer be relied upon… 

“Weber said: ‘[We] must… expand the EU into a European NATO. We can no longer rely on the US without reservation.'”

Tagesschau wrote on November 23: 

“The Europeans are now trying, with difficulty, to get back into the game… They have to offer something, for example, regarding security guarantees for Ukraine. It’s about reliability – and that’s difficult to achieve in dealings with Trump.”

Trump Backpedals on Peace Plan 

The Wall Street Journal wrote on November 22: 

“President Trump said Saturday he could be open to changes in the administration’s 28-point plan for ending the war in Ukraine after Kyiv, European governments and even some Republican lawmakers denounced it as far too heavily weighted in Moscow’s favor… He didn’t specify what changes were possible in the plan.” 

He also apparently went back on his earlier insistence that the plan must be accepted by Thanksgiving. But he also repeated his earlier accusation that the war started because of Biden’s and Zelensky’s weak leadership.

Trump Accuses Zelensky and Europe 

CNN wrote on November 23: 

“President Donald Trump slammed Ukraine’s leaders today (Sunday) for what he described as a lack of gratitude… ‘UKRAINE ‘LEADERSHIP’ HAS EXPRESSED ZERO GRATITUDE FOR OUR EFFORTS, AND EUROPE CONTINUES TO BUY OIL FROM RUSSIA,’ Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. 

“The comment harkens back to Vice President JD Vance’s remarks in the Oval Office earlier this year, when he berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky during a tense meeting and asked, ‘Have you said thank you once?’” 

These accusations are clearly false. 

Europe’s “Alternative” 

The Telegraph wrote on November 23: 

“A rival European plan to end the war in Ukraine… differs sharply from the contentious 28-point proposal put forward by the Trump administration… Among the key differences in the European plan is a requirement for ‘no restriction’ to be placed on the size of the Ukrainian armed forces

“Unlike the Trump plan, the European plan does not ban Ukraine from joining Nato, with the final decision subject to ‘consensus within the alliance’. This has long been a point of contention and is likely to anger Russia, which blames Nato for the outbreak of war and fears the alliance’s expansion on its borders. 

“The European plan also states that Kyiv would ‘not be forced to be neutral’ and would be free to invite ‘friendly forces’ to operate on its soil should it so wish… 

“The European proposals call for an immediate, unconditional ceasefire, effectively freezing the current front lines. The ceasefire would be monitored by the US and Europe. Ukraine would receive ‘robust, legally-binding security guarantees, including from the US, to prevent future aggression’ by Russia, Europe’s plan adds… 

“Under the European plan, Ukraine would be ‘fully reconstructed and compensated financially, including through Russian sovereign assets that will remain frozen until Russia compensates damage to Ukraine’.” 

Russia will never agree to this European plan. Nor to a revised Trump plan, as discussed below. 

New Plan to Be Rejected by Moscow 

The New York Post wrote on November 25: 

“Russia is set to reject the new 19-point cease-fire deal drafted by the US and Ukraine but may use disinformation tactics to keep President Trump engaged in continued talks… The White House has said it is working to secure a deal after Special Presidential Envoy Steve Witkoff developed a previous controversial 28-point version of the plan that heavily favored Moscow.  That plan included input from Kyiv, the Trump administration has insisted. [That allegation is ridiculous.] 

“The proposal, roundly criticized by both sides of the US political aisle and international community because it was so one-sided, was then narrowed down to a 19-point plan acceptable to Ukraine after talks between top Washington and Kyiv officials happened Sunday… Russia won’t agree to the 19-point version, as they already weren’t completely satisfied with the broader previous plan… The new 19-point deal vastly differs from the original, eliminating the cap on Ukraine’s active forces and leaving the door open for the country to join NATO.” 

The Daily Mail added on November 25 that Trump is in a “desperate scramble to salvage [the] Ukraine peace deal,” continuing: 

“Trump has dispatched his trusted special envoy to Moscow for crunch talks with Vladimir Putin amid fears his Ukraine peace plan is unraveling… 

“The [new] deal no longer includes amnesty guarantees for atrocities committed during the war. Kyiv has agreed to cap its army at 800,000 men. That initial plan had permanently ruled out NATO membership for Ukraine, limited its army to 600,000, proposed handing the rest of Donbas to Russia – albeit as a demilitarized zone – and mandated that Kyiv hold elections within 100 days. All those clauses are reported to have since been amended or shelved for now.” 

Is the Ukraine War Useful for Germany? 

Nius wrote on November 24: 

“‘What good is the most elaborate debt brake when the Russians are at the door?’ [CDU/CSU parliamentary group leader Jens] Spahn asked in an interview with the FAZ… , adding: ‘To put it bluntly, we Europeans only have two options: We can learn to defend ourselves or we can all learn Russian.’… 

“The Ukraine war has become incredibly useful for the CDU/CSU. It serves as a catch-all justification for everything – from debt to energy to pensions. It has already been used by the second federal government in a row to sacrifice principles. ‘Unfortunately, we now have to break everything because we promised you that you wouldn’t be stabbed anymore,’ is the simplified message. A policy that no longer protects, but only negotiates – at the expense of those who elect it.” 

Bild Online wrote: “Merz’ Christmas Tree is already burning.” 

Spying on American Citizens 

The Associated Press wrote on November 20: 

“The U.S. Border Patrol is monitoring millions of American drivers nationwide in a secretive program to identify and detain people whose travel patterns it deems suspicious… 

“The predictive intelligence program has resulted in people being stopped, searched and in some cases arrested. A network of cameras scans and records vehicle license plate information, and an algorithm flags vehicles deemed suspicious based on where they came from, where they were going and which route they took. Federal agents in turn may then flag local law enforcement. 

“Suddenly, drivers find themselves pulled over — often for reasons cited such as speeding, failure to signal, the wrong window tint or even a dangling air freshener blocking the view. They are then aggressively questioned and searched, with no inkling that the roads they drove put them on law enforcement’s radar… 

“Today, predictive surveillance is embedded into America’s roadways. Mass surveillance techniques are also used in a range of other countries, from authoritarian governments such as China to, increasingly, democracies in the U.K. and Europe in the name of national security and public safety.” 

Big Brother keeps watching and acting… 

“Trump’s Lawyers Without Integrity” 

The Ron Paul Institute published on November 20 an article by Jacob George Hornberger, an American attorney, author, and politician who was a Libertarian candidate for president in 2000 and 2020: 

“Many years ago, when I was practicing law in Texas, I learned that there were, generally speaking, two types of lawyers when it came to being asked for a legal opinion by a client who wished to pursue a certain course of action. 

“The first type of lawyer would carefully research the issue and give his honest, independent-minded opinion as to the legality of the proposed action, even if it wasn’t what the client wanted to hear. That type of lawyer had integrity and would not compromise his legal judgment, even if it angered — and risked the loss of — his client. 

“The second type of lawyer would instead come up with whatever legal reasoning was necessary to please the client, stretching case law and legal analysis in such a way as to justify what the client wanted to do. This type of lawyer had no integrity. His task, as he saw it, was to provide legal cover for his client in case things went the wrong way. 

“When it comes to President Trump’s and the Pentagon’s extra-judicial drug-war killings in the Caribbean, there is little or no doubt that the Office of Legal Counsel in the U.S. Department of Justice falls into the second category. Asked to provide a legal opinion as to the legality of such killings, the office has come up with a memorandum containing inane legal justifications, in an obvious effort to provide legal cover for the people involved in the extrajudicial killings. In fact, the still-secret memo expressly assures U.S. military personnel that they will not face future criminal prosecution for their involvement in the killings. 

“The memo states that the high number of deaths from drug use among American drug consumers constitutes an ‘armed attack’ against the United States… Are Latin American drug dealers entering the United States, kidnapping regular American citizens, physically holding them down, and then injecting drugs into their noses, mouths, or other parts of their bodies?… All of the evidence is that American consumers of drugs are voluntarily buying and ingesting mind-altering substances knowing full well that this isn’t a risk-free endeavor. 

“Another part of the memo claims that the boats that are suspected of carrying drugs are generating revenue for groups that are supposedly in armed conflict with the United States… I don’t see any Latin American cartels landing on American shores and killing American citizens. Indeed, I haven’t seen those boats firing at American Naval vessels or at American B-52s. All I’ve seen is massacres of defenseless private individuals in the face of overwhelming U.S. military power. 

“One of the other justifications on which Trump and the Pentagon are relying is their claim that these boat people are ‘terrorists.’ Apparently that governmental accusation means that they are subject to being exterminated without arrest, indictment, prosecution, conviction, and sentence — that is, without any due process of law for what amounts to an accusation of a criminal-law violation, whether it is drug-war-related or terrorist-related…

“Make no mistake about it: These drug-war killings are the equivalent of legalized murder. They are morally illegitimate, legally illegitimate, and constitutionally illegitimate, no matter the inane legal opinion issued by the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel in an obvious effort to provide cover for the people involved in these killings.” 

Illegal Actions by the Government 

The Ron Paul Institute published on November 20 the following article by Judge Andrew P. Napolitano: 

“America today would terrify the Founding FathersArmed troops roam the streets of major cities, masked government agents arrest people without probable cause and disrupt the public speech that the president hates and fears, and the president kills foreigners on the high seas whom he says might commit crimes should their small speedboats miraculously make it 1,500 miles to the United States… 

“The killings at sea will soon reach a federal court as the families of innocent murdered fishermen, and some survivors of botched killings, have signaled to the media their intention to bring actions against the government… Secondly, in September, Trump directed federal agents to disrupt speech that is anti-Christian, anti-capitalism or un-American, and to use their own judgment as to which speech to disrupt… 

“Thirdly, last spring the Department of Homeland Security began arresting Americans and foreigners on suspicion of unlawful presence in the United States. They do this without arrest warrants based on probable cause of crime, and they wear masks so as to startle victims and retard identification in subsequent court proceedings

“… there’s a new phenomenon in law called ‘The Kavanaugh Stop.’ This is derived from a bizarre concurring Supreme Court opinion recently written by Justice Brett Kavanaugh in which he argued that race, ethnicity and presence at a car wash are permissible characteristics upon which the government may stop and demand to see papers. And if the feds stop you, he opined, it’s no big deal. Just show them your papers; prove your citizenship. In Justice Kavanaugh’s strange new worldEast Germany has been reborn here. That’s just what the Founders feared most.” 

Despicable ICE Conduct 

NBC San Diego wrote on November 21: 

“Two people say U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents arrested their spouses Thursday morning during their green card interviews at San Diego’s U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services office, detailing the incidents they say shocked and stunned them. 

“One was a German man and the other a woman from the U.K., taken into custody while holding her nearly 6-month-old son. 

“The couples don’t know each other but said both people arrested came through legal pathways and have no criminal records. They said their spouses did overstay their visas but were advised by their attorneys that it is traditionally forgiven while in the green card process. [This is absolutely correct; this has always been the case.] These kinds of arrests began Nov. 12, multiple immigration attorneys say, many adding they had never seen anything like this before.   

“Both couples said they had just completed their interviews, the final step in the months-long green card process, when ICE agents walked into the room. ‘Three men with masks and bulletproof vests and guns came in and told us they were going to arrest Tom,’ said Audrey Hestmark. She said her husband Tom Bilger came into the U.S. from Germany on a visa and that they applied for his green card after they got married last year… 

“‘We see the ICE agents come around, and they say that they’re arresting Katie,’ said Stephen Paul. He said his wife originally planned to return to the U.K. last fall to wait there for her entry, but they decided to apply for her green card from here in the U.S. when she learned she was pregnant. He said they knew it would be a high-risk pregnancy and wanted to stay in the U.S. for medical care and family support, and that his attorney advised them this was permissible under immigration law because they were married… [This was absolutely correct legal advice.

“‘We were completely shocked, and I feel like we were tricked,’ Hestmark said. ‘We went through every possible legal and appropriate channel. We followed the advice of our lawyer. We were told that our case was straight forward’ [which it was]. ‘She said that she was scared. She was anxious, missed her baby. She just wants to come home,’ Paul said. ‘She said the agents themselves were in the detention down in the basement of the federal building, saying, “What are we doing here? These aren’t the sort of people we’re supposed to be arresting.”’ 

“‘… We were told that it would only be happening to criminals,’ [Hestmark] continued. ‘We’re just normal people, and it’s happening to us.’” 

These despicable episodes—by no means isolated incidents—describe the hallmark of a totalitarian country. And there are no signs that it will get better… only worse. 

Terrifying Footage of ICE Misconduct 

The Mirror wrote on November 18: 

“During a recent edition of World News Tonight, host David Muir, 52, aired unsettling footage of ICE raids in Charlotte, North Carolina… Muir turned the report over to his correspondent Faith Abubey, who was on the ground in Charlotte. She described the scene as one of ‘growing fear and outrage,’ noting that ICE has already detained at least 130 people in the city. Among the footage was a dramatic moment including a woman screaming at a border patrol agent, ‘I’m a U.S. citizen!’ 

“… The broadcast struck a nerve with viewers. On Instagram, one person posted, ‘Oh God help us all.’ Another wrote, ‘Stop this madness.’… A Charlotte local said, ‘It’s heartbreaking to see what’s happening in my city. They aren’t going after criminals; they are stopping workers in a Chick-fil-A parking lot blowing leaves and coming into yards…approaching people simply putting up Christmas lights!!!!’

“A… passionate viewer wrote, ‘…The videos being posted are HORRIFIC. Please don’t tell me ICE is removing violent criminals when they are raiding schools, churches, and the neighborhood grocery store.’… Community organizations report that immigrant-owned businesses shut down over the weekend, residents stayed home, and detentions reportedly happened even near churches and schools.” 

“This crackdown is not isolated to Charlotte. Cities like Chicago, Los Angeles, New York, and others have also seen similar operations under Trump’s enforcement agenda…” 

And Now Attack on DACA 

The New York Post wrote on November 26: 

The mother of White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt’s nephew has been detained by federal immigration officials in Massachusetts [facing deportation to Brazil]… Bruna Caroline Ferreira… shares an 11-year-old son with Leavitt’s older brother, Michael… Ferreira… came to the United States with her family as a child… 

“Ferreira’s lawyer, Todd Pomerleau, contested her arrest, saying she ‘maintained her legal status’ under the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACAprogram. ‘She’s in the process of actually getting her green card and she was abruptly arrested and taken from her young child right before Thanksgiving,’ Pomerleau said… ‘Bruna has no criminal record whatsoever,’ he said… ‘There’s no charges out there. She’s not a criminal illegal alien.’.. 

“A relative of Ferreira [Ferreira’s sister] set up a GoFundMe for her saying she was brought to the US as a child in 1998 and followed all protocols. ‘Since then, she has done everything in her power to build a stable, honest life here. She has maintained her legal status through DACA, followed every requirement, and has always strived to do the right thing,’ the fundraiser said.” 

The Daily Beast added: 

“A DHS spokesperson told the Daily Beast that Ferreira was ‘a criminal illegal alien from Brazil’ … ‘She has a previous arrest for battery. She entered the U.S. on a B2 tourist visa that required her to depart the U.S. by June 6, 1999,’ the spokesperson said. ‘Under President Trump and Secretary Noem, all individuals unlawfully present in the United States are subject to deportation.’… 

“WBUR could not find details of battery charges against Bruna Ferreira in Massachusetts’ online court records.” 

There may be more going on behind the scenes. Karoline Leavitt’s brother Michael and his finance Ferreira split, and Michael subsequently married someone else. Karoline Leavitt and Ferreira seem to have no contact. The allegation that Ferrera was charged with battery remains unproven. The attack on DACA is more than troublesome. 

Trump Attacks Democrats Over “Illegal” Orders 

The New York Post wrote on November 20: 

“President Trump lashed out Thursday at six Democratic lawmakers who released a video on social media this week urging service members to defy ‘illegal orders’ by the administration. ‘It’s called SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL,’ Trump thundered on Truth Social Thursday morning. ‘Each one of these traitors to our Country should be ARRESTED AND PUT ON TRIAL. Their words cannot be allowed to stand – We won’t have a Country anymore!!! An example MUST BE SET.’… 

“The 60-second video, titled ‘Don’t Give Up The Ship,’ featured Sen. Elissa Slotkin of Michigan, Sen. Mark Kelly of Arizona, Reps. Chris Deluzio and Chrissy Houlahan of Pennsylvania, Rep. Maggie Goodlander of New Hampshire, and Rep. Jason Crow of Colorado… 

“‘Right now, the threats to our Constitution aren’t just coming from abroad, but from right here at home. Our laws are clear,’ they said. ‘You can refuse illegal orders … you must refuse illegal orders. No one has to carry out orders that violate the law or our Constitution.’ 

“‘This is really bad, and Dangerous to our Country,’ Trump added in a second Truth Social blast Thursday. ‘Their words cannot be allowed to stand. SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR FROM TRAITORS!!! LOCK THEM UP???’ ‘SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!’ a third post read. 

“All six Democrats come from military or national security backgrounds. Crow is an Army veteran who won a Bronze Star for his actions during the Iraq War. Deluzio and Kelly served in the Navy and Houlahan served in the Air Force, while Goodlander spent 11 years as an intelligence officer in the Navy Reserve. Slotkin is a former CIA analyst who also worked in the State Department and Pentagon during the Obama administration. 

“‘No threat, intimidation, or call for violence will deter us,’ the sextet fired back at Trump in a joint statement. ‘What’s most telling is that the President considers it punishable by death for us to restate the law,’ they went on… ‘We will continue to lead and will not be intimidated.’” 

Trump’s Ongoing False Accusations 

The Independent wrote on November 23: 

“Donald Trump issued another pair of calls for Democrats who spoke out against illegal orders to the military to be jailed late Saturday evening as he battles a sinking public image and unprecedented resistance within his own party on the Hill… 

“The president was clearly irked by the refusal of congressional Republicans to join him, and used one Truth Social post to insist that America’s legal scholars were on his side – without naming any… legal scholars generally agree that the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution’s Bill of Rights generally protects a wide range of speech and expression against the government… Nothing in the video message released by Democrats would fall outside of those protections, except in the opinions of Trump’s closest loyalists. 

“In fact, a number of constitutional law experts have already spoken about how the video does not call for any use of force to resist the president or his actions; merely telling officers to refuse orders they believe are illegal falls far short of that standard… More telling, however, is the fact that even Trump’s allies in Congress aren’t backing him up…” 

FBI Tries to Intimidate Lawmakers 

The Wall Street Journal wrote on November 25: 

“A group of Democratic lawmakers said the Federal Bureau of Investigation had requested interviews with them after they appeared in a video that… called on troops to disobey unlawful orders… ‘President Trump is using the FBI as a tool to intimidate and harass Members of Congress,’ the lawmakers said in a joint statement. ‘We will not be bullied.’.. 

“Roger Williams University School of Law professor Peter Margulies said he thought the FBI probe was a frivolous investigation meant to suppress speech. Margulies, who teaches national-security law, said the Democrats were exercising their constitutional power to conduct oversight of the military. ‘Trump is really trying to put the force of the presidency and the Justice Department behind attempts to intimidate Congress,’ he said.  

“The Pentagon on Monday said it is probing allegations of misconduct [facing a military tribunal to be court-martialed] against Sen. Mark Kelly (D., Ariz.), [a retired Navy pilot and astronaut] for his comments in the video.” 

The Independent wrote on November 25: 

“Jacob Thomas, an Air Force veteran… said he was ‘appalled’ by the Pentagon’s announcement of the Kelly investigation. ‘This sham probe, spurred by baseless allegations from the Trump administration, is nothing more than an attempt to silence dissent and intimidate those who remind our troops of their duty to uphold the Constitution over unlawful orders,’ he said in a statement. ‘Senator Kelly’s call to refuse illegal directives is not misconduct, it’s patriotism. We must stand against this abuse of power and protect the integrity of our military institutions.’ 

“Veterans for American Ideals said ‘calling for an investigation into a well-known principle of service is dangerous, and says more about this administration than it does about Senator Kelly. Investigations and threats thereof into those continuing to stand by their principles of service are clearly an attempt to intimidate and silence veterans,’ the group said in a statement to The Independent, ‘the very people who have served honorably and want to ensure our military servicemembers continue to have the opportunity to reflect the honor and integrity that is instilled in us.’”

This is incredible! Please view our new StandingWatch program, titled, “Fishermen—Must Illegal Orders Be Obeyed?” Please note the Editorial in this edition. 

US Troops Invade Mexico 

Daily Mail wrote on November 20: 

“American troops have pulled up on a Mexican beach in a dramatic escalation of tensions after Donald Trump threatened to bomb the country. US ‘contractors’ arrived by boat on Monday at Playa Bagdad, driving signs into the sand near where the Rio Grande empties into the Gulf of Mexico. Alarmed witnesses quickly alerted officials and heavily armed Mexican security personnel rushed to the scene on trucks mounted with machine guns in a terrifying standoff.… The Pentagon, in a deeply embarrassing statement, admitted that its troops were mistaken when they landed on the beach.  

“The Mexican personnel watched as the Americans drove six signs into the ground, which said: ‘Warning: restricted area.’ Written in English and Spanish, they claimed that the beach was the property of the US Department of Defense and had been declared restricted by ‘the commander’. They also said unauthorized access or photography was not allowed in that area and that ‘if you are found here, you may be detained and searched.’ Mexico’s foreign affairs ministry said its navy removed the signs from the sand, which it believed were on Mexican territory.” 

With this kind of stupid “mistaken” conduct, wars start. 

“The Honeymoon Is Over” 

The New York Post wrote on November 23: 

“New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani doubled down Sunday on his claim that President Trump is a ‘fascist’ and ‘despot’… ‘That’s something that I’ve said in the past. I say it today,’ Mamdani told NBC’s ‘Meet the Press’ when asked whether he still views Trump as a fascist.

“The socialist pol said he’s eager to work with Trump because they agreed that the Big Apple needs to be more affordable at their surprisingly chummy meeting Friday.” 

Is Trump still saying, then, that Mamdani is a Marxist? That “chummy” relationship won’t last anyhow. 

Trump’s growing frustration is clearly manifested by his verbal and written aggressive outbursts on so many fronts, including angrily calling a female CNN journalist a “piggy.” But maybe it’s more than just frustration. Note the next article. 

Dementia in Trump’s Family? 

The Daily Beast wrote on November 17: 

“In a searing interview on The Daily Beast Podcast, the daughter of Donald Trump’s late older brother, Fred Trump Jr., laid out the clearest case she’s ever made that the president is exhibiting the same signs she once saw in his father, Fred Trump Sr., who had Alzheimer’s ‘for a very, very long time.’ … What she sees in her 79-year-old uncle, she said, is unmistakable. 

“‘There are times I look at him and I see my grandfather,’ Mary said. ‘I see that same look of confusion. I see that he does not always seem to be oriented to time and place. His short-term memory seems to be deteriorating.’ Trump’s lifelong impulse-control problems, she added, are also ‘deteriorating as well.’… Mary described watching Fred Sr.’s decline beginning in the early 1990s—small lapses that escalated into larger ones. By the time the family began spending Easter at Mar-a-Lago to keep him out of public view, she said, he was no longer recognizing people, including her.. 

“Donald Trump’s nephew Fred C. Trump III said last year that he fears a similar path for the president. ‘Like anyone else, I’ve seen his decline. But I see it in parallel with the way my grandfather’s decline was,’ Fred, 61, told People. ‘If anyone wants to believe that dementia did not run in the Trump family, it’s just not true.’” 

Dementia can be responsible for violent and aggressive behavior. 

Absolving Poland of the Holocaust? 

JTA wrote on November 21: 

“The new U.S. ambassador to Poland, Thomas Rose, delivered a speech [in Warsaw] in which he absolves Poland, and by extension, the Polish people, of any responsibility whatsoever for the Holocaust. This is a distortion that cannot be allowed to go unchallenged or unrefuted

“… My parents were Polish Jews who were incarcerated in the ghettos of their respective hometowns, Będzin and Sosnowiec, and then deported to Auschwitz, also in Poland, where virtually their entire families were murdered… To be sure, as Rose correctly pointed out, ‘thousands of Poles died saving Jews.’ He neglected to mention, however, that thousands of other Poles callously betrayed their Jewish compatriots and neighbors to the Germans or murdered them outright… 

“It is true that the machinery for the implementation of the Nazi ‘Final Solution of the Jewish Question’ was established by Germans – not Poles – in German-occupied Poland at places such as Auschwitz-Birkenau, Treblinka, and Majdanek. It is also true that more than 7,000 non-Jewish Poles… risked or gave their lives to rescue or help Jews. 

“What Rose seems to overlook, however, is that these heroic and altruistic individuals made up an extremely small minority of the overall Polish population, probably around a quarter of 1%. In addition, the bravery and sacrifice of many other Christian Poles who hid or otherwise tried to save Jews were never formally recognized… Even if we assume that the real figure [of righteous Poles] is 200,000, out of 21 million Poles, that’s only 1%. What about the other 99%?… 

“At the same time, let’s not lose sight — as Rose evidently did — of the many thousands of Poles who voluntarily and often quite viciously assisted the Germans in carrying out the annihilation of Polish Jewry by enthusiastically denouncing hidden Jews or handing them over to the Gestapo. Others blackmailed such hidden Jews, thereby making a horrific situation exponentially worse. Others still profiteered callously from the removal of Jews to ghettos and their deportation to death and concentration camps… there were in fact Poles who killed tens of thousands of Jews, perhaps as many as hundreds of thousands, during the years of the Holocaust… as many as 200,000 Jews were killed in Poland during the war by Poles, not Germans… 

“Rose also seems to ignore — or may be unaware of — the thousands of members of the  Polish police, known as the ‘Blue Police’ because of the color of their uniforms, who assisted the Germans in rounding up Jews, often rousted Jews out of their hiding places, and stole Jewish property as perks of their job…  A further highlight in the litany of things Rose chose not to mention in his speech was the horrific 1941 slaughter of hundreds of Jews by Poles in the eastern Polish town of Jedwabne. And then there was the post-war 1946 pogrom in the city of Kielce in which a Polish mob killed 46 Jews who had managed to survive the Holocaust.” 

Why is it that politicians seem to be eager to distort history? 

Trump Interferes in European Migration Policy

Bild Online wrote on November 23: 

“The US government… considers Europe’s refugee policy naive and dangerous and is concerned about the global consequences. This was already known. What’s new is that Washington is now actively trying to persuade countries like Germany, Great Britain, and Sweden to adopt stricter rules and laws. US ambassadors will be tasked with this in the future. 

“The State Department… has issued a directive to US embassies and consulates. They are to monitor the migration policies of other countries and, if necessary, intervene in them, according to the statement… In the message, the department announces concrete measures: ‘US officials will urge governments to act boldly and protect citizens from the dangers of mass migration.’… Another directive goes to the embassies: US officials are to immediately review regulations in Western countries that would favor migrants at the expense of their own citizens.” 

Europe won’t be happy about this American interference. 

Push for Euthanasia 

LifeSiteNews wrote on November 17:

“Canadian doctors are warning that Health Canada’s push for euthanasia is forcing doctors to suggest assisted suicide to patients… physicians are forced to discuss euthanasia or so-called ‘medical assistance in dying’ (MAID) with vulnerable patients according to Health Canada protocol… The document mandates that doctors and nurses must tell a patient about the assisted suicide options available to them while discussing medical care. 

“… many disabled Canadians are being pressured to end their lives with euthanasia during routine medical appointments… Canadians are choosing euthanasia because of poverty and loneliness, not as a result of allegedly terminal illness. 

“In one case, an Ontario doctor revealed that a middle-aged worker, whose ankle and back injuries had left him unable to work, felt that the government’s insufficient support was ‘leaving (him) with no choice but to pursue’ euthanasia. Other cases included an obese woman who described herself as a ‘useless body taking up space,’ which one doctor argued met the requirements for assisted suicide because obesity is ‘a medical condition which is indeed grievous and irremediable.’ 

“… Currently, wait times to receive actual health care in Canada have increased to an average of 27.7 weeks, leading some Canadians to despair and opt for euthanasia instead of waiting for assistance. At the same time, sick and elderly Canadians who have refused to end their lives have reported being called ‘selfish’ by their providers. The most recent reports show that euthanasia is the sixth highest cause of death in Canada…” 

What a disgusting world we are living in.

Acknowledgement and Disclaimer: 

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

This Week in the News

Trump Presidency in Trouble 

Newsweek wrote on November 14:

“Ten months into his second term, President Donald Trump is being challenged by the very base he prides himself on creating, and he finds himself besieged by an army of issues that could threaten his MAGA support and spell trouble for lawmakers who remain by his side. 

“Reeling over the farmer furor that has met his plan to import Argentine beef, and now from Democratic victories in last week’s off-cycle elections, Trump is facing friendly fire over perceived pivots on immigration, the state of the economy and the latest episode of the long-running Epstein saga that has dogged his second administration’s every step. 

“Many of these tensions came to a head in an interview with Laura Ingraham that aired on Monday, during which the Fox News host challenged the president on offering 600,000 visas to Chinese students and his unexpected praise for the H-1B visa program, characterizing these as decidedly anti-MAGA stances. 

“Trump’s defense—that China is no worse an adversary than France, and that foreign-born workers are needed to account for the U.S.’s lack of talent—seems to have sparked as much backlash as the positions themselves… polls [are] finding that his approval on key issues, such as inflation, continues to erode even among Republicans… 

“Alongside criticizing his apparent defectors—telling reporters that Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene has ‘lost her way’…  Trump’s strategy has been to… deny outright that there is any issue to contend with. The president has repeatedly claimed that grocery prices ‘are way down,’  contradicting the kitchen-table realities of most Americans, while declaring both affordability and uproar over Epstein are hoaxes created by his rivals… 

“MAGA remains Trump’s creation, and its most faithful will likely remain by his side through this perilous chapter of his presidency, but members of the broader Republican Party may soon discover the costs of devotion as they barrel toward a midterm reckoning.” 

Trump should face reality, rather than trying to ignore or even deny it.

Trump Drops Tariffs on Beef, Coffee and Tropical Fruit 

The Associated Press wrote on November 14: 

“President Donald Trump signed an executive order Friday to get rid of tariffs on a broad swath of commodities, including beef, coffee and tropical fruits [bananas, as well as tomatoes]. It’s part of a response to pressure from consumers who complain prices are too high. 

“The move comes after voters in off-year elections earlier this month cited economic concerns as their top issue, resulting in big wins for Democrats in races in Virginia and New Jersey.” 

The Guardian added on November 14: 

“Consumers have remained frustrated over high grocery prices, which economists say have been fueled in part by import tariffs and could rise further next year as companies start passing on the full brunt of the import duties… a clear majority of Americans say their monthly costs have risen by between $100 and $749. 

“The top Democrats on the House of Representatives Ways and Means Committee, Richard Neal, said the Trump administration was ‘putting out a fire that they started and claiming it as progress… The Trump administration is finally admitting publicly what we’ve all known from the start: Trump’s trade war is hiking costs on people,’ Neal said in a statement. ‘Since implementing these tariffs, inflation has increased…’” 

ABC News added on November 14: 

“The framework deals with Argentina, Guatemala, El Salvador and Ecuador will remove levies for some goods from those countries, which currently face a uniform tariff rate between 10% and 15%… 

“As of September, coffee prices have spiked 18.9%, bananas have jumped 6.9% and beef prices have soared 14.7% in the past year…  None of the countries targeted for tariff relief under the new framework deals are among the largest exporters of coffee to the U.S. Brazil is the top source of coffee for U.S. buyers, followed by Colombia and Vietnam; but tariffs on those countries remain unchanged…” 

Trump’s Economic Proposals Won’t Work 

The New York Post wrote on November 15: 

“Last week, some of the nation’s top CEOs talked and laughed with President Trump while enjoying dinner at the White House… But privately, many left that night wondering if the president really knows the score… The president’s proposed solutions, they believe, are destined to fall flat

“… the US economy is a far cry from the Reagan years of massive growth and low inflation, nor is there much evidence it’s heading in that direction. The president also appears unaware that the country’s biggest economic problem is that of affordability. This is not just when it comes to homes, but persistently high inflation that is stoking voter anxiety according to every poll available… 

No one at the table… spoke up at dinner with an opposing view… [but they] believe based on all the data available, 6% GD [predicted by Trump] is a pipe dream. Tariffs will depress growth because less of our products will be sold overseas by countries that retaliate. Plus, inflation appears to be growing, not subsiding, again thanks to tariff costs

“The affordability crisis is real and whatever Trump is doing isn’t working thus far… I am told that Trump’s advisers know things aren’t so great, but to warn Trump that what he’s doing isn’t working is the fastest way to lose your job… I can see how it’s difficult for anyone close to Trump to lend credence to the notion of a ‘crisis’ of affordability because it appears to support the left’s agenda… Trump… recently told my Fox colleague Laura Ingraham that the public’s economic anxiety is ‘fake.’ That won’t make it go away. It also robs us of a chance for a serious debate on how to fix this economy. 

“That debate, unfortunately, didn’t happen the other night with Trump, though several of the CEOs later told me the 50-year mortgage [proposed by Trump] will raise home prices, not lower them, because people can borrow more and spread mortgage payments out further. It’s also a slight of hand, of course, since borrowers will be paying the bank more interest over a longer period of time and accumulating less equity.”

The Ongoing Epstein Files Debacle

ABC News wrote on November 14: 

“President Donald Trump, in a social media post on Friday, said he will ‘be asking A.G. Pam Bondi, and the Department of Justice, together with our great patriots at the FBI, to investigate Jeffrey Epstein’s involvement and relationship with Bill Clinton, Larry Summers, Reid Hoffman, J.P. Morgan, Chase, and many other people and institutions, to determine what was going on with them, and him.’ 

“Bondi announced later Friday she has tapped Jay Clayton, the current U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, to lead the Trump-ordered investigation of Epstein’s involvement with high-profile Democrats and JP Morgan Chase…  ‘As with all matters, the Department will pursue this with urgency and integrity to deliver answers to the American people.’ 

“Back in July, the DOJ and FBI released a memo on Epstein concluding there was ‘no incriminating “client list'” and ‘no credible evidence found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions.’ The DOJ and FBI said at the time no further charges were expected in connection with their probes into Epstein… 

“Trump’s call for a Justice Department investigation comes after House Democrats released [more than 20,000 pages of records it received] from Epstein’s estate [some of which] mentioned Trump by name… Bipartisan pressure continued for the administration to release the rest of the Epstein files.  

“Democratic Rep. Robert Garcia, the ranking member of the House Oversight Committee, said in a statement on Friday that the panel’s Epstein investigation has ‘panicked’ Trump. Garcia, responding to Trump’s social media post, said Trump is ‘trying to deflect from serious new questions we have about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.’ 

“‘The President has not explained why he won’t release the files to the American people. Or why sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell was moved to a cushy low-security prison after her interview with Trump’s former personal lawyer,’ Rep. Garcia added.” 

It should be obvious that Trump is trying to deflect from his alleged involvement (even though no evidence has been produced that he was in any way involved, but the same goes for Clinton). Also, questions have been raised as to why an investigation of Clinton could be remotely justified when Trump called the entire Epstein debacle a “hoax” by the Democrats (even though it is clearly not a hoax). Also, suspicions about Epstein’s alleged suicide are still rampant.   

Trump stated that “Some Weak Republicans have fallen into their [the Democrats’] clutches because they are soft and foolish.” But after Trump had unsuccessfully made repeated attempts to kill the effort, he bowed to pressure and made a total flip-flop, urging his fellow [“weak, soft and foolish”] Republicans to vote for the release of all Epstein documents and stated he would sign such a bill endorsed by the House and the Senate. 

Greene Breaks With Trump 

NBC News wrote on November 14: 

“President Donald Trump issued a scathing social media post Friday against Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., saying that he was ‘withdrawing his support and Endorsement’ of someone who had previously been one of his closest allies… 

“Greene speculated that Trump was upset over the re-emergence of the Jeffrey Epstein case… ‘It’s astonishing really how hard he’s fighting to stop the Epstein files from coming out that he actually goes to this level,’ Greene wrote on X. ‘But really most Americans wish he would fight this hard to help the forgotten men and women of America who are fed up with foreign wars and foreign causes, are going broke trying to feed their families, and are losing hope of ever achieving the American dream.’” 

Greene has a point. Trump very inappropriately said she went “far left” and called her “wacky, a ranting lunatic, a disgrace and a traitor.”

One has to indeed ask the question: WHY was Trump so determined to prevent the release of all the Epstein files? What was he afraid of? What was he trying to hide? And what about the sudden turn-around? Is something going on behind the scene? It has been speculated that in any event, not all documents will be released due to the “investigation” against Clinton and other Democrats. It is also expected that there will be a battle over redactions. Bild Online wrote on November 15 that the contents of the already released documents is becoming more and more unpleasant for Trump. The tabloid also wrote that nobody can ask Epstein about his emails as he is dead, and his accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell, is perceived to be a pathological liar. 

House and Senate Passed Epstein Bill 

The Hill wrote on November 18: 

“The Senate agreed by unanimous consent Tuesday to approve a House-passed bill to require the Justice Department to release all unclassified records and documents related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, sending the bill to President Trump’s desk for a signature… The momentum to pass the bill through the Senate quickly, became overwhelming after the House passed it by a margin of 427 to 1.” 

Subsequently, Trump signed the bill on Wednesday. The DOJ is supposed to release the files within 30 days. Will they? Note the next article. 

Quick Release in Doubt 

The Washington Post wrote on November 19: 

“The legislation that Congress agreed to pass Tuesday gives the Justice Department a few exceptions under which it can refuse to release material. Among them: if release ‘would jeopardize an active federal investigation or ongoing prosecution.’… [This] could become a reason for the Justice Department to block release of many files… 

“The Justice Department has also said many of the files cannot be released because they contain sensitive victim information and pornographic material. The legislation contains another exception allowing the Justice Department to withhold material that ‘would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy’ or ‘depicts or contains child sexual abuse.’… 

“There would not be much recourse for Congress if the Justice Department refused to hand over the files since the bill does not have any enforcement teeth.”

Greene Accuses Trump of Betraying America over al-Sharaa Welcome 

The Daily Mail wrote on November 16: 

“Marjorie Taylor Moore launched a fierce tirade against President Donald Trump and accused him of betraying the American people on Sunday morning… Greene took the opportunity to scorn the president for welcoming Syrian president Ahmed al-Sharaa to the White House this week. Trump laughed and joked with Al-Sharaa in the Oval Office – despite the fact the Muslim leader has long been sanctioned as a specially-designated global terrorist

“The Saudi-born leader joined al-Qaeda in Iraq just before the US invasion in 2003. He was captured by American forces and imprisoned for five years until 2011 – and there has been a $10 million bounty on his head since.” 

Trump’s cozy relationship with Ahmed al-Sharaa is indeed deeply troublesome. Also note the next article.

MBS in Washington 

ABC News wrote on November 18: 

“President Donald Trump on Tuesday angrily defended Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman during his first trip to the U.S in seven years, saying that what the Saudi royal has done is ‘incredible in terms of human rights’ and dismissed questions about journalist Jamal Khashoggi’s murder…, a Washington Post columnist and Saudi critic, by Saudi agents in Istanbul, causing global outrage…

“Trump interjected when the prince was asked about Khashoggi’s murder… ‘You’re mentioning somebody that was extremely controversial,’ Trump said referring to Khashoggi. ‘A lot of people didn’t like that gentleman that you’re talking about, whether you like him or didn’t like him, things happen, but he knew nothing about it, and we can leave it at that,’ he said about MBS…

“In 2021, a report from [Trump’s] U.S. intelligence community found, ‘We assess that Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Muhammad bin Salman approved an operation in Istanbul, Turkey to capture or kill Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi…’

“The president touted the business deals and economic cooperation, including a $1 trillion investment in the United States… Trump confirmed… that he [had agreed] to sell F-35s to Saudi Arabia as part of a weapons deal, which experts say would mark the first time those fighters have been sold to an Arab military. The… sale of advanced F-35 fighter jets to the Saudi kingdom is likely to cause consternation in Israel.”

The Guardian added on November 18:

“The agreement will be similar to the one the US has with Israel, which is significant as until now Israel has been the only country in the Middle East to have the jets. The move has the potential to alter the military balance in the region… MBS made clear that normalisation with Israel (i.e. Saudi Arabia joining the Abraham Accords, which Trump really wants) could not happen without first securing a clear path towards a two-state solution.”

Trump also secured an agreement for Saudi Arabia to buy nearly 300 American military tanks, and Trump said that the USA will designate Saudi Arabia as a “major non-NATO ally” –whatever that means.

Some of Trump’s comments and actions are very hard to accept. In the light of biblical prophecy, they are plainly counterproductive and pose great dangers for Israel AND the USA. Trump’s admiration and praise for dictators will become a thorn in his flesh. 

Fears of Denaturalization 

ABC News wrote on November 14: 

“There’s now fear that the push to drastically increase deportations and shift who can claim America as home… is having a ripple effect… 

“Some are worried that if they leave the country, they will have difficulties when trying to return, fearful because of accounts of naturalized citizens being questioned or detained by U.S. border agents… Immigration enforcement roundups, often conducted by masked, unidentifiable federal agents… have at times included American citizens in their dragnets…. Adding to the worries, the Justice Department issued a memo this summer saying it would ramp up efforts to denaturalize immigrants who’ve committed crimes or are deemed to present a national security risk… The atmosphere makes some worried to speak about it publicly, for fear of drawing negative attention to themselves. .. 

“What citizenship has meant, and who was included, has expanded and contracted over the course of American history, said Stephen Kantrowitz, professor of history at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He said while the word ‘citizen’ is in the original Constitution, it is not defined. ‘When the Constitution is written, nobody knows what citizenship means,’ he said. 

“The first naturalization law passed in 1790 by the new country’s Congress said citizenship was for any ‘free white person’ of good character. Those of African descent or nativity were added as a specific category to federal immigration law after the ravages of the Civil War in the 19th century, which was also when the 14th Amendment was added to the Constitution to establish birthright citizenship. 

“In the last years of the 19th century and into the 20th century, laws were put on the books limiting immigration and, by extension, naturalization. The Immigration Act of 1924 effectively barred people from Asia because they were ineligible for naturalization, being neither white nor Black. That didn’t change until 1952, when an immigration law removed racial restrictions on who could be naturalized. The 1965 Immigration and Naturalization Act replaced the previous immigration system with one that portioned out visas equally among nations. 

“American history also includes times when those who had citizenship had it taken away, like after the 1923 Supreme Court ruling in U.S. vs. Bhagat Singh Thind. That ruling said that Indians couldn’t be naturalized because they did not qualify as white and led to several dozen denaturalizations. At other times, it was ignored, as in World War II, when Japanese Americans were forced into internment camps. ‘Political power will sometimes simply decide that a group of people, or a person or a family isn’t entitled to citizenship,’ Kantrowitz said.” 

Your blood must boil when you read these examples of absolutely incredible injustice. For sure, America’s governments have a lot to answer for. 

Democrats at the Crossroads 

The Huffington Post wrote on November 14: 

“The longest government shutdown ever may finally be over, but the Democratic Party is just beginning to reckon with angry voters who are sick and tired of seeing them lose to President Donald Trump. Their frustrations were particularly evident in New Hampshire, a state represented by two moderate Democrats in the Senate who helped cut a deal with Republicans that funded the government in return for essentially nothing. New Hampshirites… said they felt demoralized by their surrender and called for new blood to carry the torch into the future… 

“The anger is clearly reminiscent of the disillusion Republicans faced during the Tea Party era a decade ago, though it’s too soon to tell what it will mean for the party’s electoral chances… However, in the short term, the ongoing discontent could lead to another government shutdown early next year... The deal funding the government until Jan. 30 was backed by eight Senate Democrats and included a vote next month on extending enhanced subsidies for people enrolled in the Affordable Care Act. However, that vote is expected to fail due to Republican opposition to anything having to do with Obamacare. Trump and GOP lawmakers are instead pitching an alternative plan that would replace the subsidies with flexible spending accounts… 

“Denying government funding again would be a risky strategy for Democrats… As much as most Democrats would like to forget this whole episode as fast as possible and unite their party against Trump, they must first reassure skeptical voters that they are equipped to lead his opposition…” 

Blowing Up Shipping Boats 

The Ron Paul Institute wrote on November 14: 

“Starting in September the Trump administration announced [20] strikes on boats in the Caribbean which have killed at least [80] seafarers…  By framing the military campaign as a war, the administration is able to argue that murder statutes do not apply… 

“At the recent meeting of the G7 foreign ministers the French publicly declared that any such boat strikes are illegal… Britain is allegedly withholding some intelligence from the U.S. because of concern about the boat strikes… Colombian President Gustavo Petro has likewise stopped intelligence sharing on the issue…

“Anyone in the U.S. intelligence services and military should be aware that taking part in such strikes is a criminal endeavor which may get them prosecuted in international courts…  Adm. Alvin Holsey, the head of Southern Command… abruptly announced he was resigning at year’s end, which will be about a year into what is typically a three-year assignment. More soldiers should follow the man’s example.” 

Tucker Carlson on Pastor Dietrich Bonhoeffer 

Newsmax wrote on November 14: 

“Tucker Carlson has ignited a wave of outrage across the conservative and Christian worlds after claiming that Dietrich Bonhoeffer — the anti-Nazi theologian executed by Adolf Hitler’s regime in 1945 — had ‘decided … we have to kill the guy [Hitler],’ suggesting the German pastor ultimately advocated murder… 

“Bonhoeffer, a Lutheran pastor and founding member of the Christian resistance movement known as the Confessing Church, was imprisoned for helping Jewish Germans escape to Switzerland. He was later linked to the resistance circle involved in the failed July 20, 1944, plot to assassinate Hitler. His hanging in April 1945 at the Flossenbürg concentration camp in Bavaria by the Third Reich made him one of Christianity’s most revered martyrs of the 20th century… 

“Author Eric Metaxas, whose best-selling biography ‘Bonhoeffer: Pastor, Martyr, Prophet, Spy’ helped introduce the theologian to millions of American Christians, blasted Carlson’s comments as historically and theologically illiterate. ‘Tucker’s statements about Bonhoeffer are WRONG,’ Metaxas wrote on X… ‘Bonhoeffer did not advocate MURDER, which would have been sinful, but he did understand that within a just war people are KILLED. ‘Will Tucker now condemn David for killing Goliath?’ 

“Metaxas elaborated that Bonhoeffer’s involvement with anti-Hitler resistance was deeply rooted in Christian ethics… ‘In my BONHOEFFER book I detail the ethical struggle he had in participating in the plot to kill Hitler,’ he wrote in another post… ‘ But let’s be clear. Not all killing is MURDER.’… 

“Conservative leader Charlie Kirk, who was assassinated on Sept. 10 during a speaking engagement at Utah Valley University, had long praised Bonhoeffer as a moral model for Christians resisting tyranny, contrasted sharply with Carlson’s portrayal….” 

Not all killing is murder? With that false assessment, killing in war has been justified, wrongly claiming it is Christian to kill someone who fights for the “forces of evil.” This world is terribly deceived. Read our free booklet, “Should YOU Fight in War?” 

Trump Defends Tucker Carlson 

JTA wrote on November 17:

“President Donald Trump defended Tucker Carlson’s recent interview with avowed antisemite Nick Fuentes, weighing in on a debate over antisemitism that has roiled the Republican party. ‘I’ve found him to be good. He’s said good things about me over the years…  You can’t tell him who to interview. If he wants to interview Nick Fuentes, I don’t know much about him, but if he wants to do it, get the word out.’

“The president’s comments were his first on a growing divide within the Republican party over Carlson giving a platform on his top-rated podcast to Fuentes and over the growth of the antisemitic Fuentes-led ‘groyper’ movement on the right. Yet neither Trump nor Vice President J.D. Vance have joined the chorus of condemnation for Fuentes’ brand of white supremacy. Vance, who employs Carlson’s son Buckley on his staff, in recent days defended Buckley from a right-wing Jewish activist’s accusations of antisemitism without directly addressing the Fuentes controversy…

“Carlson campaigned with Trump for his 2024 reelection and has significant influence within his administration, while Trump dined with Fuentes and the antisemitic rapper Ye in Mar-a-Lago in 2022…” 

Propaganda Against Trump in Germany 

Nius wrote on November 14:

“German public broadcasters… demonize Donald J. Trump more than perhaps any other Western politician… ARD, ZDF, and their subsidiaries have been shaping the image of an authoritarian monster since 2016, abandoning basic journalistic principles: context, neutrality, factual accuracy…

“In a speech Trump gave in Davos in 2018, Tagesschau deliberately manipulated the audio to make the boos sound louder… Later, ARD even admitted that it had manipulated the audio. 

In March 2024, ZDF made a blatant false claim while reporting on a Trump campaign speech in Ohio. In that speech, Trump discussed economic policy, tariffs, and Chinese cars. Addressing the Chinese, who were building huge car factories in Mexico to sell their vehicles in the United States, he said: ‘If I get elected, we’re going to put a 100 percent tariff on every car that crosses the border – you will not be able to sell those cars. If I don’t get elected, it’s going to be a bloodbath for the whole country – that will be the least of it. But they will not sell those cars…’ 

“It is absolutely clear: this is plainly about economic policy. Trump is saying, in essence, that without him, an economic disaster awaits – ‘bloodbath’ being a common metaphor in this context. But millions of viewers of Germany’s second-most important news program were presented with something that never happened. The ZDF anchor said: ‘He wraps his call for political violence in comments about the car industry.’ Yet no such call for violence ever occurred. Even the left-leaning outlet Correctiv stated in a fact-check that Trump had neither threatened nor called for political violence. 

“Nevertheless, the public broadcasters refuse to let go of their fake news. Months later – long after the ‘bloodbath’ matter had been clarified – ZDF still tries to convince its audience that ‘bloodbath’ referred to political carnage. In a report, ZDF again omits the context. The word ‘car industry’ does not appear at all… 

Linguistic manipulation is added to the mix: while the removal of illegal immigrants – a long-standing practice in the U.S., predating Trump – used to be translated correctly as ‘Abschiebungen,’ public broadcasters now increasingly use the term ‘Deportationen’… Yet in Germany the word “Deportation” evokes something entirely different: the forcible expulsion or banishment of criminals, political opponents, or entire groups – above all the mass deportations of Jews to Nazi forced-labor and extermination camps… The purpose of these deliberate mistranslations is clear: to evoke associations with the Third Reich… 

One can debate Trump’s role on January 6, 2021. He spoke of election fraud and initially refused to acknowledge the certified result. He had called for protests for weeks and spoke on January 6 near the White House, while Congress counted the Electoral College votes. Midway through his speech, Trump said explicitly: ‘I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.’ 

“That the BBC documentary series Panorama omitted this passage and used manipulative editing – which has now sparked a major media scandal… went unmentioned in German media. Instead, ARD, ZDF, and Deutschlandfunk all claimed Trump had staged a kind of coup, and that his heated speech triggered the events… Nearly five years after the ‘storming of the Capitol,’ this version still prevails… One can criticize Trump’s conduct that day, but he explicitly did not call for violence and – albeit far too late – tweeted ‘Stay peaceful!’ once the violence had begun…” 

The mass media cannot be trusted. 

Antifa Declared a Terrorist Organization 

Euro News wrote on November 14: 

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Thursday that Washington would designate German-based Antifa Ost… as ‘Specially Designated Global Terrorists’. ‘Groups affiliated with this movement ascribe to revolutionary anarchist or Marxist ideologies, including anti-Americanism, “anti-capitalism,” and anti-Christianity, using these to incite and justify violent assaults domestically and overseas,’ Rubio said. 

“‘The United States will continue using all available tools to protect our national security and public safety and will deny funding and resources to terrorists, including targeting other Antifa groups across the globe,’ he added… 

“The State Department said the German-based Antifa Ost ‘committed numerous attacks against people it perceives as “fascists” or part of the “right-wing scene” in Germany between 2018 and 2023.’ The organisation is also accused of having ‘conducted a series of attacks in Budapest in mid-February 2023.’ Hungary had already placed the group on its national terror list at the end of September…” 

This designation is absolutely correct. Note the next article. 

Antifa Terror Actions and Threats 

Bild Online had written on November 4 about the latest terror attack by Antifa in Germany: 

“Around twelve hours after the car of AfD leading politician Bernd Baumann (67) was burned down in Hamburg, Antifa claimed responsibility for the attack. A statement claiming responsibility was uploaded to the far-left website Indymedia on Monday afternoon at 3:27 p.m.… 

“The statement concludes with a vile death threat: ‘All you damn MAGAfreaks, you will follow Kirk to hell!’ MAGA stands for the slogan ‘Make America Great Again’ used by the US president during his election campaign, and the statement implies that all Trump supporters face the same fate as the murdered Charlie Kirk (†31).” 

George Washington’s Haunting Vision 

The Daily Mail wrote on November 15: 

“In the winter of 1777, legend goes that George Washington received a vision that has haunted America for over two centuries. An angelic figure appeared to him at Valley Forge, prophesying three great trials the young nation would face. The first two have been fulfilled – the Revolution that birthed the country, and the Civil War that nearly tore it apart. 

“But the third prophecy spoke of something yet to come: ‘hordes of armed men’ carried over the sea to invade America… Washington’s third vision includes ‘a threat of war in a future time that would be so great with powers from the east crossing the sea.’” 

America will indeed be invaded by great powers in the Eastern Hemisphere—the last European revival of the Roman Empire. 

False Jewish Teachings Regarding the “Red Heifer” 

Israel 365 News wrote on November 13: 

“The burning of the red heifer on July 1 marked a significant moment in Jewish tradition… It should be emphasized that the red heifer is used to purify the nation of Israel from impurity resulting from proximity to or contact with a dead body. This state of purity is necessary for Jews to ascend to the Temple [The Bible does not say this; in fact, there is no biblical requirement for a red heifer today]… Jews are currently the only verifiable descendants of Israel [This is absolutely false. Jews are just one tribe—the tribe of Judah—of the 12 tribes or sons of Jacob.] 

“Of course, ashes of the red heifer that are not made on the Mount of Olives while facing the site of the Holy Temple are completely invalid [where does the Bible say this?]… Anyone who invents something other than the Seven Noahide Commandments [allegedly, God gave Noah seven commandments… the Bible does not say this] causes those who listen to him to sin, and this includes anyone who invents that the ashes from a red heifer exercise purify Gentiles, or heals Gentiles, or anything else – such a person is among the fraudsters and swindlers, and one must distance oneself from him and distance him.” 

This ridiculous statement would include all nominal and real Christians. 

Abbas—A Prince of Peace? 

Israel 365 News wrote on November 14: 

“French President Emmanuel Macron stood beside Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas in Paris. The French leader declared the head of the PA to be a ‘prince of peace,’ echoing Pope Francis’s 2015 description of Abbas as an ‘angel of peace.’ … Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu responded immediately, calling Macron’s praise ‘the opposite of reality.’ 

“[Macron issued] a warning to Israel that any annexation of Judea and Samaria would trigger a European response.”

Hungary Warns Brussels Driving Europe Towards Nuclear War 

The Times of India wrote on November 15: 

“Hungary’s Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto has delivered one of his most blistering speeches yet, accusing Brussels of dragging Europe toward a catastrophic nuclear confrontation… Szijjarto claimed the EU is deliberately pushing the Russia–Ukraine conflict into deeper escalation, warning that the current military standoff ‘can only result in a nuclear war that destroys our entire planet.’ He slammed European institutions for ‘shamelessly pouring money and weapons into Ukraine,’ arguing that the bloc has emptied its own armouries while forcing European citizens to foot the bill for a war they never chose

“Szijjarto went further, accusing Brussels and Kyiv of meddling in Hungary’s domestic politics by backing the opposition Tisza Party ahead of the upcoming national elections. According to the minister, the EU wants a ‘puppet leadership’ in Budapest—one that will march in lockstep with its foreign policy. He insisted that only Viktor Orban’s government can keep Hungary out of the conflict and protect the country from migration pressures and political coercion.” 

Ukrainians to Be Deported 

Daily Mail wrote on November 14: 

“The Trump administration is gearing up to send Ukrainians back to their war-torn homeland, with 80 people being targeted for removal… Lawyers… told the Post:… ‘Ukraine is a war zone, currently under martial law, and it is likely that any deportees will be forcibly drafted into the army and sent to the front where they face a high likelihood of death…’” 

Merz: Ukrainians Should Stay in Ukraine and Fight 

Politico wrote on November 13: 

“German Chancellor Friedrich Merz urged Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to curb the flow of young Ukrainian men to Germany and ensure they stay to defend their country… His comments come amid growing concerns in Germany — particularly within Merz’s conservative ranks — that public support for the Ukrainian cause could wane if young male Ukrainians are seen to be avoiding military service by coming to Germany.” 

Newsworm wrote on November 13: 

“Merz also reaffirmed the government’s plans to remove access to citizens’ benefits (Bürgergeld) for Ukrainian refugees in Germany… According to a report by Bild newspaper, the reform would result in tens of thousands of Ukrainians losing their entitlement to citizens’ benefits.” 

Cannon Fodder in the Clutches of the Bundeswehr 

Report 24 wrote on November 14: 

“Agreement on Conscription: Those Who Aren’t Lured In Will Be Forced… 

“The governing coalition has agreed on a conscription model. They emphasize ‘voluntariness’ by enticing recruits with payments of €2,600 gross per month and the prospect of additional subsidies. However, if the cannon fodder isn’t willing, force will be used: If the need isn’t met by volunteers, a ‘random selection process’ will be activated. 

“With financial incentives and tiered recruitment processes, young people are being lured into the Bundeswehr (German Armed Forces). Those who don’t take the bait are forced in step by step. The democratic fig leaf serves only to stifle criticism… 

“The coalition of the CDU/CSU and SPD has buried its internal squabble and proudly presents a model that systematically drives young people into the clutches of the Bundeswehr… 

“Behind the reform lurks the massive expansion of the armed forces to 260,000 active soldiers… supplemented by 200,000 reservists… These figures expose the hypocrisy: Instead of peace policy…, Berlin submits to foreign plans that degrade young people to cannon fodder, while politicians sit safely enthroned in their offices… 

“While Pistorius prevented the so-called ‘double lottery system’ of the Union, which would have determined conscription and then enlistment by lottery, the essence remains a watered-down form of coercion that turns voluntary service into a lie and lures young people into a trap.” 

This article raises important, albeit often unpopular points. 

How German Companies Are Preparing for War 

Focus wrote on November 14: 

“The German economy is arming itself for war… It’s becoming clear: Companies are working on action plans for the moment normal operations break down. The term ‘war’ doesn’t appear officially everywhere, but the logic is evident… 

“The turning point [“Zeitenwende”] is here, and it doesn’t just affect the arms industry, but ordinary factories… An entire economic landscape is rearming, following the directives of those in charge.” 

Everyone is expecting war! 

Civil Service Is Making a Comeback 

Bild Online wrote on November 14th: 

“With the new military service… its almost forgotten sibling is also being revived – civil service!… If… those selected by lottery for military service refuse it, they are legally required to perform alternative service. And that is civil service!… 

“The CDU/CSU alliance sees ‘conscription on demand’ as merely a stepping stone: They want the mandatory Year of Germany – compulsory service for everyone!… The CDU/CSU has prominent supporters for this… Federal President Frank-Walter Steinmeier (SPD)… called for ‘compulsory service for everyone’ on Wednesday at the Bundeswehr oath ceremony marking 70 years of the armed forces – either in the military or in the civilian sector!” 

Difficult times are ahead for Germany. 

Shocking Survey Results 

Focus wrote on November 16: 

“According to a survey, a majority of Germans [58%] support the planned mandatory military medical examination of young men born in 2008 or later… 57 percent of those surveyed do not expect enough volunteers to come forward in the future to meet the Bundeswehr’s personnel targets… 

“Personal willingness to perform military service also remains low. Only 31 percent of Germans say they would volunteer, while 55 percent rule it out…” 

What is this nonsense? The majority wouldn’t volunteer for the Bundeswehr, but they support universal military medical examination—the precursor to compulsory military service? 

Merz Sticks to Unpopular Firewall 

Die Welt wrote on November 15: 

“Chancellor Friedrich Merz (CDU) addressed current political issues at the Young Union’s national convention… 

“Merz reaffirmed that there would be no cooperation between his party and the AfD. ‘Not because there’s a firewall between us – forget that word! We are worlds apart from this party,’ Merz said… ‘We have nothing in common with them.’ The Chancellor received loud applause and cheers for his remarks.” 

However, Merz’s speech, accompanied by applause, does not reflect the opinion of the German population. Bild Online published a commentary on November 14 with the headline: “The ‘Firewall’ Tactic Is Alienating Many Voters.” The commentary continues as follows: 

“In a survey… 56% of CDU/CSU supporters are in favor of cooperating with the AfD in parliament. 46% consider this appropriate ‘on a case-by-case basis,’ and ten percent are in favor of it as a matter of principle. Among the general population, 25% are generally in favor of cooperation between the CDU/CSU and the AfD, and 30% are in favor ‘on a case-by-case basis.’ This implies that the ‘firewall’ tactic is alienating many voters! 

“This opinion poll contradicts the established practice of the CDU and CSU, which categorically excludes any agreement with the AfD. Why are the CDU/CSU politicians acting differently than the majority of their supporters want? Because they are thinking purely tactically and neglecting the substance of the issue. They are isolating the AfD to weaken it. In doing so, they accept that decisions that would actually be in their interest will not be made if AfD members of parliament vote for them. 

“But voters aren’t interested in tactics. They want to see results. They demand that campaign promises be kept, regardless of who votes for them and who doesn’t… The CDU/CSU could only keep most of its campaign promises (migration, basic income, climate policy, debt) if the AfD voted with it. Instead, the CDU/CSU governs with the SPD and is therefore breaking its campaign promises.” 

AfD Welcome in USA 

Politico wrote on November 14: 

“Dozens of politicians from the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party will travel to Washington in December at the invitation of a group of House Republicans… The invitation to AfD politicians comes at a time when German far-right figures are increasingly looking for support from MAGA Republicans in the U.S. for what they frame as a struggle against political persecution and censorship at home… 

“AfD leaders see the invitation to Washington as an opportunity to win more legitimacy domestically for their claims of persecution… The trip to Washington by AfD members in December is to be followed by a larger-scale conference early next year… 

“U.S. Rep. Anna Paulina Luna [said:] ‘The German government’s recent actions against its own citizens resemble the authoritarianism of the Soviet Union prior to its fall more than Russia does today.’” 

New Rules for Tourists Traveling to Europe 

TTW wrote on November 15: 

“Europe is introducing new policies that will affect tourists and travelers in 2026… 

“… the European Travel Information and Authorisation System (ETIAS) will require visa-exempt travelers to apply for an online travel authorization before entering the Schengen Area. Previously, citizens from countries like the United States, Canada, and Australia did not need a visa to travel within the Schengen Zone… This system [is] set to be fully operational by the end of 2026… Without the ETIAS authorization, travelers may be denied boarding, making it crucial to complete the application process well in advance… 

“In another significant change, the Entry/Exit System (EES) will be fully rolled out by April 2026. The new system will require travelers to provide biometric data, such as fingerprints and facial recognition scans, when crossing Schengen borders… 

“One of the lesser-known changes to the Schengen visa policy is the visa suspension mechanism, which can revoke visa-free travel for certain countries under specific circumstances. If a country’s nationals experience a significant surge in irregular migration or pose security risks, the European Union can suspend their visa-free privileges. This means that tourists from countries like the US, Canada, or Japan may suddenly face visa requirements if their country of origin faces migration or security issues… 

“For non-EU nationals, the rule allowing only 90 days of stay within any 180-day period in the Schengen Area will be strictly enforced starting in 2026. This means that travelers who overstay their allowed period could face penalties, fines, or even bans from entering the Schengen Area in the future… 

“… travelers to Europe in 2026 will need to be more diligent than ever about ensuring their travel documentation is complete and up to date. Passports must meet the necessary validity requirements, typically at least three months beyond the planned departure date. Additionally, travelers will need to prepare for the possibility of digital visa applications, biometric data submission, and even additional health checks depending on the state of global health concerns…” 

No More Cash at Christmas Market 

Bild Online wrote on November 16: 

“On November 20, the stalls at the ‘Polarzauber’ Christmas market at Zurich’s main train station (Switzerland) will open – with one change: ‘The entire Polarzauber is cashless – all stalls accept card payments as well as mobile payments such as Twint, Apple Pay, or Google Pay,’ according to the Christmas market’s website. Payment can be made with ‘all common credit and debit cards.’ If vendors accept cash anyway, they will have to pay a fine of 500 Swiss francs (around 540 euros)… In case of repeated offenses, stallholders will even be excluded from the market

‘The Swiss Federal Railways (SBB) owns the train station where the Christmas market is held and supports the cash ban. The city of Zurich, which rents out public spaces for Christmas markets, also has no objections…” 

Madness! The totalitarian, regulated and controlled insanity continues. 

Acknowledgement and Disclaimer: 

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

This Week in the News 

How Long Will the German Coalition Last? 

Report 24 wrote on November 7: 

“Not even 200 days in power, but already all trust lost: The high poll numbers for the AfD vividly demonstrate how convinced the population is of the black-red coalition in Germany. Even within the government, there is now increasing unrest. Jens Spahn is said to have already declared, with regard to the SPD [CDU’s coalition party], that they will not ‘die with them.’ The mainstream media is now speculating about a possible collapse of the coalition… 

“Will the whole thing blow up around Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s (CDU) door before Christmas? A nasty joke is circulating in the CDU/CSU parliamentary group: What’s the difference between God and Friedrich Merz? God doesn’t think of himself as Friedrich Merz, but Merz thinks of himself as God! The chancellor, who constantly violates the eighth commandment (‘Thou shalt not lie’), will certainly need God’s help if he wants to save his chaotic coalition from the end of the year. 

“It’s rumored that some members of the parliamentary group are considering a minority government. But how would it be able to function? That would only be possible with the support of the AfD. But Merz has ruled them out ‘as long as I’m Chancellor’… Hot rumor…: Spahn, for whom there’s ‘always an alternative,’ could be elected Chancellor with the votes of the AfD! A rumor—nothing more for now.” 

Note: “Thou shalt not lie” is not the eighth commandment, as the article falsely claims, but the ninth. 

Germany Is the Titanic 

Nius wrote on November 7: 

“Friedrich Merz… has a… task: to avert the catastrophe with those who are willing to avert the catastrophe, that is, with the votes of the AfD, for example, in a minority government. There are no other voices. Using the existing votes to even have a chance of reversing the policies of the last ten years and averting the worst is actually no longer the free choice of Merz and his party, but their patriotic duty… With his firewall madness, Merz is playing with the livelihoods of millions of people. 

“Here is what the head of TUI, the world’s largest travel company, says about our economic situation: ‘I have the impression we are on the Titanic,’ Ebel said in an interview with the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ). ‘The band is playing, everyone is celebrating, but the ship is already fallen over, and nobody’s doing anything.’ 

Germany is the Titanic, and no, we’re not heading straight for the iceberg; we’ve already collided, and the orchestra is already playing. These aren’t my words, but the words of one of the country’s most astute CEOs… Friedrich Merz is standing before a burning house and must decide whether he’s willing to accept [AfD’s] Alice Weidel’s help to save the people in the attic. Without her, he can’t… 

“All members of parliament have a patriotic duty to put the country above crazy ideas like the ‘firewall,’ but sometimes they need to be reminded of that… right now, the CDU doesn’t want to do the right thing, their duty, with the votes of the AfD, but instead wants to march even more energetically into disaster…” 

“Each of us knows and loves people who may still be caught in the propagandistic clutches of the Tagesschau (German news program) and educational television. They know nothing of what is looming, they haven’t heard the words of the TUI CEO because it is deliberately concealed from them in the mainstream media… People who have been watching Tagesschau and Heute (German news programs) for decades… are going headlong and cheerfully into their economic downfall…” 

Defense Minister Boris Pistorius—Germany’s Most Beloved Politician

The Washington Post wrote on November 8: 

“Boris Pistorius (SPD), the German defense minister, is… the man now responsible for revamping and expanding the armed forces in a country that has been allergic to militarization for 80 years since instigating two world wars… 

“A nation and a continent that have defined themselves since World War II as a peace project now face an urgent imperative to arm and defend themselves against a growing Russian threat. It is a challenge they are struggling to meet. Russia’s aggression and President Donald Trump’s demands that Europe take responsibility for its own security have led to a remarkable shift in public perception of the continent’s needs… 

“A fierce debate over reinstating compulsory military service highlights Pistorius’s challenge… When Pistorius introduced a proposal that relied on voluntary recruitment, it was blocked by Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU), which leads the governing coalition. Last month, the coalition presented a revised plan that included provisions for a draft lottery — only for Pistorius to object… 

“Pistorius is the most popular German politician since Angela Merkel… [No] defense minister [was] this beloved since Helmut Schmidt more than 50 years ago… 

“The new military law is set to come into effect on Jan. 1, but its final shape remains unclear, with the intra-coalition conflict still unresolved. Polls show that around 6 in 10 Germans support conscription if voluntary recruitment proves insufficient. But most people between 18 and 29 — those likeliest to be drafted — are against it… 

“As one of the few German politicians with positive favorability, Pistorius has been floated as a future candidate for chancellor, potentially in the scheduled 2029 election — or sooner, if the governing coalition collapses. The German government has tended to swing between the center-left and the center-right, suggesting the SPD’s turn could come next. But these aren’t normal times: The AfD is surging, the mainstream parties are doing all they can to keep the far right out of power…” 

Their attempts to do so will not be successful. 

Modern Military Service Is Coming…

Euro News wrote on November 13:

“Germany will require all men to register for potential military service from 1 January 2026, with compulsory service to be reintroduced if volunteer numbers fall short of targets set to meet NATO commitments. ‘Modern military service is coming,’ said Jens Spahn, Chairman of the ruling CDU/CSU parliamentary group, in a press statement… From 1 January, around 700,000 young people born in 2008 or later will be contacted to complete their registrations and [mandatory] medical screenings, said Spahn, adding that women will also receive a letter, but unlike men, they are not obliged to respond.

“If the required number of conscripts is not reached through voluntary service, compulsory service will be introduced through a separate law… [Defense Minister Boris Pistorius said:] ‘These are reasons for exemption such as there have already been two brothers in basic military service, police officers, someone who has enlisted and signed up for civil defence, conscientious objectors.’…

“At the same time…, the coalition partners have agreed that all men will be subject to compulsory military service in the future… According to current plans, the Ministry of Defence believes it will be possible to draft entire cohorts from July 2027. Men born in 2008 are to be included first, as per the SPD minister’s words.

“In addition, a mandatory online questionnaire is planned for men. From 2026, they will have to provide information on health, fitness, education and their willingness to perform military service, provided the Bundestag passes the law as planned. Women and people with non-binary gender identities will be able to complete the questionnaire voluntarily.”

 The draft law is expected to be introduced to parliament for a vote by the end of the year. Bild Online reported that if compulsory military service were to be introduced through a separate law, those who need to serve (for 6 months) would be determined by lottery. 

Germany’s “Justice”? The Case of Prince Reuss 

Nius wrote on November 5: 

“Prince Reuss has been in pretrial detention for almost three years now – without a verdict, without hope of release. An old man, seemingly forgotten, stuck in an endless legal waiting room. Is something terribly wrong here?… 

“The ‘Reichsbürger’ group Reuss became known through a high-profile anti-terror raid at the end of 2022. The public prosecutor’s office claims that a total of around two dozen suspects allegedly planned a violent overthrow of the federal government. Heinrich XIII, Prince Reuss, is said to have been the ringleader. Yet even former Interior Minister Otto Schily warned early on: ‘My subjective impression is that this rather bizarre group of cranks does not pose a real threat to the state and society.'” 

“The highly publicized raid on December 7, 2022, already indicated that something wasn’t right in the Reichsbürger trial… 

“Today, Heinrich XIII, Prince Reuss, has been in pretrial detention for 1,065 days. Almost three years – without a verdict. And to this day, there is no ‘smoking gun’ – no conclusive proof. This is a years-long circumstantial evidence trial against elderly people accused of terrorism, who are allegedly so dangerous that they are being held in pretrial detention – under the harshest possible conditions, the kind reserved for murderous terrorists: minimal opportunities for visitors, intrusive body searches, and stripping before masked and armed officers. And this has been going on for over a thousand days now – without any proof of guilt… 

“Meanwhile, numerous convicted criminals—some of them dangerous—walk free in Germany. ‘Thousands of convicted criminals are at large in Berlin because arrest warrants are not being executed. Among them are 59 murderers and 66 people convicted of manslaughter,’ wrote the Tagesspiegel in 2024. 

“One might consider Prince Reuss an oddball or an eccentric. According to his lawyer, he wouldn’t even vehemently object to that. But when an old man, who has never been proven to have committed a violent crime, literally faces his own end in a ‘terrorism trial,’ one has to ask what is greater here: the rule of law or the justified fear of losing it.” 

The answer is clear. Germany is falling into the abyss of dictatorship. 

Kristallnacht Survivors Testify 

Israel Today wrote on November 9: 

“On the 87th anniversary of Kristallnacht, three Holocaust survivors who lived through the infamous 1938 Nazi pogrom in Germany as children warned that the world today is once again dangerously unsafe for Jews, urging governments to take decisive action to combat antisemitism and strengthen Holocaust education. 

“Walter Bingham, 101, George Shefi, 94, and Paul Alexander, 90, who all experienced Kristallnacht, issued a stark joint statement with the International March of the Living, saying that the current wave of global antisemitism mirrors the climate of hate that preceded the Holocaust…. Alexander, whose father was arrested that night and sent to Buchenwald, added: ‘The world today is no safer for Jews than it was 87 years ago. The images of the past two years remind us of the darkest days of the 1930s in Nazi Germany.’.. 

“In the aftermath of the pogrom, all three were sent to Britain on the Kindertransport. Shefi never saw his mother again; she was murdered in Auschwitz. Bingham’s father perished in the Warsaw Ghetto. Alexander, one of the few Kindertransport children to reunite with both parents, later made his way to Israel, where all three survivors now live. 

“In their statement, the survivors wrote: ‘We saw with our own eyes how hatred turned to flames, how indifference became complicity, and how the world stayed silent as Jews were attacked. Today, 87 years later, we look around us and say with deep pain: the world has learned nothing. Once again, Jews are murdered for being Jews. Once again, synagogues are attacked. Once again, universities remain silent in the face of incitement. In today’s atmosphere, Kristallnacht could happen again.’” 

Please note our recent StandingWatch program, titled, “Antisemitism on the Left and the Right.”  

The Jewels of the Habsburg Family 

Deutsche Welle wrote on November 7: 

“After they were exiled from Austria in 1919 in the wake of World War I when Austria became a republic, the family of the last Austrian emperor had most of their belongings expropriated. Only a small amount of personal property — including pieces of jewelry listed as private — was allowed to be relocated to Switzerland. The official crown jewels remained in Vienna and are on display there to this day

“Following her husband Emperor Karl I’s death in 1922, Empress Zita had ordered her descendants to keep the jewelry’s existence secret for 100 years for security reasons. She and her children later faced persecution by the Nazi regime due to their outspoken opposition to Hitler’s dictatorship. The family escaped to Canada via France and Portugal shortly before their Belgian home was bombed by the Nazi German Luftwaffe at the outbreak of the war. They crossed the Atlantic with the jewelry collection in a brown suitcase, bringing them to safety in Quebec in 1940. 

“The surviving pieces include the famous Florentine diamond, which those outside the family had long thought lost, probably stolen. The walnut-sized yellow diamond was once among the largest cut diamonds in the world… It had been among the treasures of the Grand Duke of Tuscany in Florence, and is also known as the Tuscan Diamond. It passed into the hands of the Habsburgs through marriage when the last of Florence’s Medici family died. 

“The collection also includes items once belonging to Empress Maria Theresa, Queen Marie-Antoinette, and Emperor Franz I. The jewelry’s authenticity has been verified by independent experts. 

“In a statement, head of the family Karl von Habsburg  [64, grandson of fleeing Emperor Karl I], said the time had come for the public to see the jewels. ‘As descendants of Emperor Karl I and Empress Zita, we are proud to share these culturally and historically significant pieces with the public,’ he said, adding gratitude to Canada. ‘We would like to extend our gratitude to the people of Canada, who provided a safe haven for our family in 1940, protecting them from extremely challenging circumstances.’ 

“The Habsburgs, with some interruptions, provided numerous Holy Roman kings and emperors from 1273 onward. After the dissolution of the empire in 1806, they became the Austrian imperial house, which lasted until the end of the First World War.” 

Karl V. of Habsburg was head of the seventh revival of the Roman Empire. His empire was so vast that the sun would never set in it. 

The Daily Mail added on November 7: 

“At its height of power, the House of Habsburg was one of the leading and most influential rulers in Europe. [Karl I.] sent the diamond, as well as other centuries-old jewels, to Switzerland for protection as he went into exile. After the monarch died in the Portuguese island of Madeira, his wife Zita of Bourbon-Parma and her children moved to Spain and later Belgium. 

“As Nazi rule spread across Europe, Zita and her eldest son, crown prince Otto von Habsburg, vehemently opposed Adolf Hitler’s rise. But when the Nazis annexed Austria in 1938, Otto was declared an enemy of the state. Zita was forced to flee again to the US two years later… She carried the jewels, family members said, in a small cardboard suitcase. With American assistance, the family reached Canada and settled in Quebec… Zita returned to Europe in 1953 and died in 1989 at the age of 96. As she lived her life, the prestigious diamond remained in Canada – unbeknownst to the world… 

“However, the diamond could soon be on the move again. Austria has committed to an ‘immediate review’ as to whether the diamond belongs to the country… ‘If it turns out that the Florentine Diamond is the property of the Republic of Austria, I will initiate the process of returning the jewel,’ Austrian vice chancellor Andreas Babler said.” 

Otto von Habsburg met Herbert W. Armstrong and spoke at the Ambassador Auditorium in 1983. 

Sisi’s Jewels 

Bild Online added on November 7: 

“Her jewels were as legendary as her beauty. Now, jewelry belonging to the Austrian Empress Elisabeth (1837–1898), known as ‘Sisi’ [‘Sissi’ in the famous film adaptations starring Romy Schneider and Karl Heinz Boehm as her husband and cousin, Emperor Franz Joseph I, who died in 1916], has surfaced in an unassuming bank safe in Canada… 

“During the revolutionary unrest of 1918, Emperor Karl I tasked his Lord Chamberlain, Count Leopold Berchtold, with securing the family jewels from the revolutionaries. Berchtold gathered the most valuable pieces, including a diamond crown belonging to Empress Sisi, as well as a cuff of brilliant-cut diamonds with a large emerald and the legendary ‘Florentine’ diamond…” 

“When Karl I died in exile on the Atlantic island of Madeira on April 1, 1922, his widow Zita, the last Empress of Austria (1892–1989), decreed that the jewel cache must remain secret at least until the 100th anniversary of her husband Karl I’s death… 

“The Habsburg Law of 1919 allows… an almost complete confiscation of the imperial family’s assets by the state of Austria.” 

“Sisi’s” and Franz Joseph’s son, Crown Prince Rudolf, committed suicide in 1889, so the succession passed to the line of Franz Joseph’s brother, Karl Ludwig. Karl von Habsburg (64), son of Otto von Habsburg, is the current head of the House of Habsburg-Lorraine and the grandson of the last Emperor of Austria-Hungary, Karl I. Karl von Habsburg served as a Member of the European Parliament for the Austrian People’s Party from 1996 to 1999. 

Democrats Cave–Ending Shutdown? 

CNN wrote on November 10: 

“Enough Democrats caved. A Sunday night Senate deal may be on the verge of resolving the longest government shutdown on record — after a group of moderate Democrats dropped their key demand — a guaranteed extension of Obamacare subsidies. 

“The agreement opened the way for a Senate vote in which eight Democratic defectors voted to break the filibuster and to clear the first hurdle to reopening the government after nearly six weeks. Their move will offer relief to millions of Americans whose lives have been severely disrupted by the shutdown. 

“But the compromise was opposed by some key party leaders and is already igniting a firestorm of protests from progressives who accuse their more moderate colleagues of disastrously backing down, handing President Donald Trump a victory and turning their backs on millions of Americans who can’t afford spiking health care premiums… 

“It might be crass to parse the human misery caused by the shutdown for a partisan win after a political duel that deprived millions of Americans of food benefits, left federal workers with $0 paychecks, and created chaos and safety fears in commercial aviation… 

“The deal sets a date for a vote in the Senate on ACA subsidies in December, but falls well short of cementing their extension. It funds the government through January 30 and guarantees pay for federal workers furloughed during the shutdown and those who worked without pay. It also reverses Trump’s firing of federal employees throughout the impasse and funds food stamps through 2026… 

“… On the face of it, this looks like a massive failure. Democrats won no undertaking that Obamacare subsidies will be extended — despite insisting that such a move was their bottom line. The best they will get is a Senate vote. There is no guarantee that a bill extending subsidies will pass, considering the Senate’s GOP majority. And the prospects of the Republican House endorsing it seem even more remote… 

“Many leading Democrats argued their party’s big wins in elections in New Jersey, Virginia and New York City last week were attributable to the effective way their candidates lacerated Trump over the cost of living. Now, at the first chance they got to put that lesson into practice — fighting for the affordability of health care — they gave up, even though polls showed most voters blame Trump for the shutdown and agree with the Democratic position. 

“The blowback could be severe, exposing deep divisions in the party… Still, assessments of the break in the deadlock that came on Day 40 of the shutdown must also factor in whether the Democrats’ demand was achievable in the first place and whether the deepening pain of the shutdown, which is fast becoming a national crisis, was about to make their position unsustainable… [as it] was obvious that securing an extension to Obamacare subsidies might be unattainable… 

“Throughout the shutdown, Trump… seemed indifferent to the daily struggles of millions of Americans. It was easy for Democrats to portray him as cruel as his administration fought court orders to restore funding to food assistance for 42 million Americans… Trump seemed quite willing to allow the pain and anxiety of the shutdown to deepen for millions of Americans… With the president refusing to negotiate, it was incumbent on Democrats to consider whether the cost of carrying on was justified… 

The health care system is broken, people may lose insurance, and Republicans may end up with the blame if they don’t fix it, since they are the party in power…  Republicans are still not off the hook on the enhanced Obamacare subsidies. GOP leaders now face the question of whether they are willing to let them expire, in a scenario that could put health care out of reach for millions of people. This seems an unsustainable political position in the run-up to midterm elections, and the issue is set to only gain in traction as the end of the year looms. 

“And bitter divisions in the GOP — most graphically exemplified during the shutdown by Marjorie Tayloer-Greene, with her scathing criticism of her party’s dearth of ideas on health care — are likely to burst open when the House… will again test the authority of Speaker Mike Johnson. 

“The shutdown drama also revealed rare signs that Trump’s authority over his own party isn’t absolute on Capitol Hill. Republican senators ignored his demands to abolish the filibuster that requires most bills to get 60 votes in the chamber. Such a move would have given Trump almost unlimited power to use GOP majorities to transform the nation over the next year. But GOP senators feared what any Democratic majority might do in the absence of the filibuster…” 

Breitbart added on November 11: 

“The Senate passed a continuing resolution (CR) to reopen the government Monday night, 40 days after Democrats triggered what is now the longest government shutdown in history. The vote ends a disastrous shutdown for Democrats, but the civil war for the soul and direction of the party is just beginning… Senators reached a time agreement Monday evening to bypass Senate procedures that would have prolonged the passage of the bill by as long as several days… The bill now makes its way to the House…” 

Trump Ends Shutdown

The New York Post wrote on November 12:

“President Trump signed a funding bill Wednesday to end the longest government shutdown in US history, hours after the House of Representatives passed legislation ending the 43-day standoff… Trump re-upped his demand for Senate Republicans to ‘terminate’ the filibuster — so that ‘this would never happen again’ — and called for the ‘massive amount’ of federal funding for Obamacare to be ‘paid directly to the people of our country, so that they can buy their own healthcare.’…

“The legislation will return federal workers [and air traffic controllers] to their jobs with backpay, reopen executive branch agencies that provide critical veterans services and other benefits like food stamps and fully fund the government until at least Jan. 30. After that, some spending for SNAP benefits, veterans programs, legislative branch activities and military construction, among other items, will continue until Sept. 30 — at which point the 2026 fiscal year ends….”

Daily Mail wrote on November 13:

“Trump was surrounded by top Republicans and national business leaders as he railed against Democrats, blaming them for the record-breaking closure once more, despite polling showing that many voters think Republicans bear the blame for the shutdown… Trump also called again for ending the filibuster, a proposal that has been unpopular with members of both parties….”

Full SNAP Benefits? 

The New York Post wrote on November 7: 

“The Supreme Court on Friday allowed President Trump’s administration to temporarily withhold roughly $4 billion needed to fully fund food aid for 42 million low-income Americans [but allowing for partial payments], escalating a showdown over hunger relief during the historic government shutdown. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson [nominated by Joe Biden] issued an administrative stay pausing a lower-court order that required full November payment under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP. The stay will remain in effect until two days after the [liberal] Boston-based 1st US Circuit Court of Appeals rules on the administration’s formal request to limit payments. [This would give the administration time to return to the Supreme Court if the appeals court rules against Trump.] 

“US District Judge John McConnell in Rhode Island had ordered the government on Thursday to use all available funds — including a separate $23.35 billion child-nutrition account supported by tariffs — to cover the full $8.5 to $9 billion cost of November SNAP benefits. McConnell, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, accused the administration of withholding aid for ‘political reasons’ [and had stated the halting full payments would cause irreparable harm]. 

“The administration said it had already allocated $4.65 billion in emergency funds to cover part of the month’s costs, but not the full amount. The 1st Circuit denied an initial request to stay McConnell’s order but has yet to rule on the broader appeal. 

“The USDA complicated matters Friday when it notified states that funds would be available to pay full SNAP benefits — even as the administration filed papers seeking to block the very order that made that money accessible. Officials in New York, New Jersey and Massachusetts moved quickly to issue full payments, saying they could not risk another delay. Wisconsin, Oregon, Hawaii, and Pennsylvania also confirmed they had released full benefits by Friday evening, while other states — including Colorado, North Carolina, and Illinois — said they would follow over the weekend. Delaware began using state funds to provide emergency payments… 

“The political and legal whiplash has left millions of SNAP recipients… unsure when — or whether — they will receive food aid. SNAP benefits, which lapsed at the start of November for the first time in the program’s 60-year history, provide up to $298 per month for one-person households and $546 for two-person households, depending on income…” 

Newsmax clarified on November 7: 

“The Trump administration had initially halted November SNAP disbursements entirely after congressional appropriations lapsed, triggering panic among state agencies and food banks. Two separate federal rulings last week ordered partial payments using a $5 billion contingency fund — short of the roughly $9 billion needed to cover all benefits [for 42 million Americans]… The government shutdown is now the longest in American history.” 

The Associated Press wrote on November 9: 

“President Donald Trump’s administration is demanding states ‘undo’ full SNAP benefits paid out under judges’ orders last week, now that the U.S. Supreme Court has stayed those rulings… The demand from the U.S. Department of Agriculture came as more than two dozen states warned of ‘catastrophic operational disruptions’ if the Trump administration does not reimburse them for those SNAP benefits they authorized before the Supreme Court’s stay.” 

This comes AFTER the Trump administration had authorized full payment. 

Both parties blame each other for the shutdown. But the American people hold both parties responsible. With all these legal maneuverings, and difficult-to-understand Supreme Court rulings under the circumstances, the most important question is whether needy Americans will get immediate assistance or not. Subsequently, the Court of Appeals ruled again that full payment must be made, and the Supreme Court ruled again against it. This is incredible, but it is of great concern considering what other decisions the Supreme Court is willing to make, favoring Trump. 

Even with the end of the shutdown on paper, it is totally unclear when full SNAP payments will be made. 

Flights Delayed and Cancelled

Breitbart wrote on November 7: 

“More than 1,000 flights were canceled and thousands more delayed Friday as part of a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) reduction of air travel capacity brought on by the ongoing government shutdown. 

“Earlier this week, FAA Administrator Bryan Bedford initiated the reduction to deal with staff shortages and overworked flight controllers brought on by a month of  unpaid workdays, and Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy warned the air travel system will degenerate into ‘mass chaos’ if the shutdown doesn’t end by November 11. 

“As a result, Bedford announced the agency would reduce flights by 10 percent at 40 ‘high-volume markets’ throughout the country to ensure safety… As of noon Eastern time on Friday, there had been roughly 1200 flights canceled and nearly 16,000 delays…” 

The Guardian reported on November 7: 

“If the federal government shutdown doesn’t end ‘relatively soon’, the Department of Transportation may decide to increase the number of cancelled flights at designated airports to 15 or 20%, transportation secretary Sean Duffy told Fox News today, citing the likelihood of air traffic controllers not reporting to work.” 

While Congress plays political games, many Americans suffer. Politics is just such a dirty business. Even with the end of the shutdown on paper, it is clear that the air traffic disaster will continue for a while.   

Everything More Expensive! 

The conservative New York Post ran the following headline on November 6: 

“Trump touts affordability while inflation rages across America on everything from food to furniture to cars.” 

The article continued: 

“With a social media post that said ‘STOP LYIN’ about there being an affordability crisis, President Trump claims he’s whipped inflation. But consumers are still feeling the squeeze. Target’s prices are up 5.5% nationwide this year and Walmart’s are up 5.3%, according to an analysis by DataWeave, which looked at roughly 16,000 items across each retailer’s website. Amazon’s price hikes have averaged more than 12%, according to a report. 

“After seven months under Trump’s tariffs, Americans are paying more for nearly everything — from a cup of joe and plush living room sofas to children’s toys… Bananas are up 8.6%, mostly because of tariffs, as almost none are produced domestically… Beef is up across the board — more than 19% for steak and 14% for ground beef… 

“Voters listed the economy as a major issue in this week’s elections…  Chris Sohan, 61, who lives in Queens and shops once a week for himself, his wife and son, doesn’t see any relief. ‘Everything is expensive,’ he said. ‘Maybe sometimes $50, sometimes $100,’ he said he is now paying extra… Sohan voted for Trump twice, but has been disappointed… 

“For months, businesses have been eating the bulk of Trump’s tariffs, which have hit key trade partners like China and Vietnam and goods like furniture, aluminum, vehicles and auto parts. Now, companies have started to pass along those costs — and Goldman Sachs economists have warned that consumers will end up bearing the brunt of the bills by the end of this year. 

“Across Amazon, Target and Walmart, apparel prices rose 11.5% on average between January and the end of September… The big chains’ prices for home goods, pet goods and consumables, health and beauty items, and hardlines — like electronics, furniture and appliances — rose 10.8%, 6.1%, 7% and 8.3%, respectively… 

“As an example of how tariffs are hitting prices: In October, Trump unveiled steep new tariffs on pharmaceutical drugs, kitchen cabinets, bathroom vanities, heavy trucks — and a 30% rate on furniture. Later that month, IKEA hiked the price of a three-piece oak bedroom set to $1,049, up from $949 in August, according to the Wall Street Journal. It also raised the price of its Uppland sofa to $899, up from $849. 

“Federal data show prices for living room, kitchen and dining room furniture — which is mostly imported from other nations — jumped 9.5% in September compared to the previous year. Furniture and bedding rose 4.7% over the same period, while furnishings and supplies increased 2.8%.

Most low-cost furniture sold in the US — like a cheap chair — comes from overseas, particularly China. 

“In August, Sony blamed Trump’s tariffs as it hiked the price of its PlayStation 5 by $50 to $550. It claimed the tariffs are costing the company $685 million annually. At Walmart, a T.rex toy jumped up to $55 in May from $39.92 the previous month… The retailer’s Baby Born doll rose to $49.97 in May, up from $34.94 in March, while an Etch-a-Sketch increased to $24.99, up from $14.97, during the same period… 

“In October, a Mango jacket retailed for $649.899 for US customers — compared to just 299.99 euros, or about $347, in Spain…  River Island sold a coat for $247 in the US in October, but offered the same coat to UK customers for 110 pounds, or about $145. A Zara skirt retailed for $69.90 in the US, but just 35.95 euros, or $42, in Spain. 

“Even the price of coffee is up a whopping 41% in September from the same time last year, according to the CPI…” 

Lamb has become so expensive that some restaurants don’t offer it anymore, while others have raised the prices by double or triple digits. 

Is Trump Repeating Biden’s Mistakes? 

Newsmax wrote the following on November 7: 

“A New York Post editorial cautioned that President Donald Trump risks repeating former President Joe Biden’s mistakes by brushing off Americans’ frustrations over high living costs. Trump’s recent remarks mirror Biden’s past dismissals of economic worries, the editorial board wrote, even as households continue to feel pressure from inflation and rising prices. 

“The board recalled Biden’s 2024 comments to CNN, when he called reports of economic anxiety ‘fake news’ and instead touted strong gross domestic product growth and record stock market gains. It noted that Trump has used similar talking points in recent interviews, highlighting job creation and new market highs as proof of success… The board argued that such claims ignore everyday realities faced by many Americans. It agreed that Biden’s ‘profligate spending’ drove much of the inflation that continues to strain consumers, but said Trump’s own record has yet to bring meaningful relief. 

“While inflation has slowed to 2%-3%, prices remain high and are unlikely to return to earlier levels, the board wrote. The board… warned against his broad use of tariffs… [pointing out] that Trump’s across-the-board approach ‘increased the cost of almost everything.’… By denying these realities, the board wrote, Trump risks alienating voters much as Biden did…” 

The Wall Street Journal added on November 8: 

“Americans are deeply frustrated with their government’s inability to solve problems…” 

Denying that just about everything got more expensive is fake news. Trump is playing a dangerous game—also in light of his unconscionable immigration policy. We believe that God has placed him in power to fulfill important biblically-prophesied responsibilities, such as helping to build the Third Temple, but God can and will easily remove him from office if he proves unworthy, as He did in the case of King Saul. 

Please note our StandingWatch program, “Trump in the Light of Biblical Prophecy,”  our sermonette “Will Trump Build the Third Temple?—Comments on News and Prophecy, October 26,2025,” and our recent Editorial, “When Our Critics Become Silent…” in Update #1180 (dated October 31, 2025).

$2,000 Payment for Each American??? 

The New York Post wrote on November 9: 

“President Donald Trump promised a $2,000 payment for every American as a tariff ‘dividend,’ in a post Sunday morning. The post comes after the Supreme Court questioned the legality of his use of emergency powers to impose sweeping new tariffs on nearly every country on Earth. ‘A dividend of at least $2000 a person (not including high income people!) will be paid to everyone,’ read Trump’s post on Truth Social. Trump added that the tariffs have brought in ‘trillions of dollars’… ‘People that are against Tariffs are FOOLS!,’ he wrote. He also claimed there was ‘No Inflation’ from the duties. 

“The US collected about $151 billion from import duties between April and October, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said he expected the US to collect $500 billion or more in tariff revenue per year.” 

As the previous articles show, Trump’s claim that there was no inflation from the tariffs is clearly false. 

His promise that Americans will receive “dividends” from the tariffs has been made repeatedly in the past by the Trump administration, but so far, they have not been fulfilled at all. We will see what will happen. Is it just pure politics? The Daily Mail interpreted Trump’s comments on November 9  in this way: “Trump has vowed to give a $2,000 check to every American, thanks to the tariff revenue his administration has collected.” 

Fox 11 Los Angeles News wrote: 

“A factual overview of stimulus and relief payments in the U.S. indicates that no new federal stimulus checks have been authorized by Congress or confirmed by the IRS for November 2025. While President Donald Trump has proposed a $2,000 tariff dividend using tariff revenue, this remains a proposal that has not been approved.” 

Of course, Trump made a promise, not just a “proposal.” 

However, Bessent’s recent comments that the $2,000 dividend “could come in lots of forms and lots of ways,” such as “paying for the tax decreases” on tips and overtime, are not very reassuring. Similar promises were made in regard to Social Security payments, claiming that they would no longer be taxed. This has proven to be completely false for most recipients. 

But IF America received that much money in tariff revenue, as claimed, it is, as the famous song puts it, a “dirty rotten shame” that SNAP recipients can’t be paid in full. 

New U.S. Restrictions for Visas 

TNR wrote on November 7: 

“The Trump administration has ordered visa officers to deny immigrants who are obese or have certain health issues… 

“A Thursday directive from the State Department, sent to embassies and consulates around the world, indicates that people applying for visas to the United States may be rejected if they have certain medical conditions, on the grounds that they could take up domestic health care resources. 

“‘You must consider an applicant’s health,’ the cable read. ‘Certain medical conditions—including, but not limited to, cardiovascular diseases, respiratory diseases, cancers, diabetes, metabolic diseases, neurological diseases, and mental health conditions—can require hundreds of thousands of dollars’ worth of care.’ 

“The announcement then goes on to mention obesity, stating that it can be connected to asthma, sleep apnea, and high blood pressure…. Denying fat people from the U.S. because they might end up having health issues is incredibly broad, cruel, and unusual.” 

UK No Longer Willing to Share Some Intelligence with USA 

MSNBC wrote on November 12: 

“Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth made the latest in a series of announcements: Deadly U.S. military strikes killed six people on Sunday as part of the latest operation against civilian boats in international waters. According to the Pentagon’s official tally, this was the 19th such strike since early September, with a collective death toll of 76 people… while Donald Trump and his team have insisted that the boat crews are made up of ‘narco-terrorists,’ an Associated Press analysis found that these claims weren’t altogether true

“It’s against this backdrop that the controversy took on a new dimension this week related to international intelligence sharing. CNN reported that the United Kingdom is no longer sharing intelligence with U.S. officials about suspected drug trafficking vessels in the Caribbean ‘because it does not want to be complicit in US military strikes and believes the attacks are illegal.’… 

“If the reporting is accurate, it’s a dramatic development in its own right: It suggests one of the United States’ closest and most important allies doesn’t want to bear responsibility for deadly, extrajudicial military operations in international waters.” 

Many legal experts have concluded that the strikes are in fact illegal. 

Trump Meets Orban 

Deutsche Welle wrote on November 7: 

“President Donald Trump welcomed Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban to the White House on Friday for their first bilateral meeting since Trump returned to power in January…” 

The Hill wrote on November 5: 

“Much of the visit centered around Orbán’s request that Trump provide Hungary with an exemption to continue importing Russian oil not subject to U.S. sanctions… Trump also appeared to defend Orbán from his European critics and those imposing costs on Budapest’s democratic rollbacks. ‘He’s a great leader and he’s respected all over. Not necessarily liked by some of the leaders, but those leaders are proven to be wrong,’ the president said. If you look at Europe, they’ve made tremendous mistakes on immigration. It’s really hurting them very badly. He has not made a mistake on immigration…’ 

Deutsche Welle wrote on November 7: 

“Orban said Friday his country received an exemption from US sanctions on imports of Russian oil… ‘We asked the president to lift the sanctions,” Orban said, adding that Hungary is ‘in a significantly different situation than other European countries.’ According to a White House official…, Hungary was granted a one-year exemption…. 

“Hungary relied on Russia for 74% of its gas and 86% of its oil in 2024.” 

Hungary and Slovakia are the two European countries still importing Russian oil while the rest of the European Union has stopped purchases. 

USA Will Boycott G20 Meeting in South Africa 

Newsmax wrote on November 7: 

“President Donald Trump said Friday that no U.S. government officials would be attending the Group of 20 summit this year in South Africa, citing the country’s treatment of white farmers… ‘It is a total disgrace that the G20 will be held in South Africa,’ Trump wrote on Truth Social. He cited ‘abuses’ of Afrikaners, including violence and death as well as confiscation of their land and farms. 

“The Trump administration has long accused the South African government of allowing minority white Afrikaner farmers to be persecuted and attacked. As it restricted the number of refugees admitted annually to the U.S. to 7,500, the administration indicated that most will be white South Africans who it claimed faced discrimination and violence at home. 

“But the government of South Africa has said it is surprised by the accusations of discrimination, because white people in the country generally have a much higher standard of living than its Black residents, more than three decades after the end of the apartheid system of white minority rule. The country’s president, Cyril Ramaphosa, has said he’s told Trump that information about the alleged discrimination and persecution of Afrikaners is ‘completely false.’ 

“Nonetheless, the administration has kept up its criticisms of the South African government. Earlier this week during an economic speech in Miami, Trump said South Africa should be thrown out of the Group of 20…” 

South Africa is a descendant of the ancient House of Israel, and to be more precise, of Joseph’s son Ephraim. The USA is also a descendant of the ancient House of Israel, and to be more precise, of Joseph’s son Manasseh. The Bible prophesies that in the end time, Ephraim and Manasseh will be at odds with each other (Isaiah 9:21) 

BBC’s Woke Culture 

Daily Mail wrote on November 6: 

“Martine Croxall broke the BBC’s rules when she pulled a face because her script said ‘pregnant people’, the broadcaster has said. The newsreader won a legion of new fans and the backing of JK Rowling [author of the Harry Potter books] when she rejected the gender-neutral language live on air. But now the Executive Complaints Unit has ruled that her facial expression suggested a ‘controversial view about trans people’.  

“The ECU upheld complaints from 20 viewers saying Ms Croxall had fallen ‘short of the BBC’s expectations of its presenters and journalists in relation to impartiality’.   

“Ms Croxall was introducing new research on the number of heat-related deaths expected amid Britain’s current heatwave. But as the autocue prompted her to warn ‘pregnant people’ to take care in the heat, she first read the term out before overriding it, with a smirk and eyebrow raise.  

She said: ‘Malcolm Mistry, who was involved in the research, said the aged, pregnant people – women! – and those with pre-existing health conditions need to take precautions.’… 

“… the ECU said: ‘… the ECU considered the facial expression which accompanied the change of “people” to “women” laid it open to the interpretation that it indicated a particular viewpoint in the controversies currently surrounding trans identity, and the congratulatory messages Ms Croxall later received on social media, together with the critical views expressed in the complaints to the BBC and elsewhere, tended to confirm that the impression of her having expressed a personal view was widely shared across the spectrum of opinion on the issue.’” 

This is so hilarious as in the USA, for example, every newscaster seems to put his or her personal spin on the “news” which is being reported. 

BBC’s Ties to Hamas 

Israel 365 News wrote on November 6: 

“A leaked report has exposed shocking evidence of the BBC’s anti-Israel bias—revealing that Hamas propaganda was broadcast to millions while executives covered it up. From platforming extremists to spreading proven falsehoods about Gaza, the BBC’s credibility is collapsing.” 

The Sun added on November 7: 

“A devastating leak revealed that BBC management has been sitting on evidence of BBC News’ horrific pro-Hamas bias in reporting on the Middle East.” 

BBC’s Fakery 

The Sun wrote on November 7: 

“The episode of Panorama broadcast as Americans prepared to go to the polls last November deliberately spliced together different sections of Mr Trump’s speech on January 6, 2021, when rioters mobbed the US Capitol. The fakery led viewers to see Mr Trump urge his supporters to go to the Capitol and ‘fight like hell’ instead of his actual call to protest peacefully. 

“That goes beyond an editorial take — it crosses into outright fakery and deception. And what’s worse is that the bosses knew about it. Before the row blew up this week with the leak of Prescott’s memo, the contents of it were shared internally in his role advising the BBC’s Editorial Guidelines and Standards Committee.” 

The Sun wrote on November 7: 

“THE White House last night accused the BBC of ‘outright lies’ over its ‘deceptive editing’ of a Donald Trump speech… now the crisis risks a full-on diplomatic incident… White House deputy press secretary Abigail Jackson blasted: ‘Trust in the media is at an all-time low because of deceptive editing, misleading reporting, and outright lies. This is yet another example, of many, highlighting why countless Americans turn to alternative media sources to get their news.’… 

“… in a leaked memo from Michael Prescott, who was a former advisor to the BBC’s Editorial Guidelines and Standards Committee… [he also] accused the Corporation of ‘effective censorship’ of its reporting on transgender issues, and said BBC Arabic was downplaying the suffering of Israelis in the war with Hamas.” 

BBC, once considered to be a reliable news source, has long lost that reputation. 

The Sun wrote on November 9: 

“SCANDAL-hit BBC Director Tim Davie has resigned after the broadcaster was accused of doctoring a speech by President Donald Trump. The CEO of BBC News Deborah Turness has also resigned following massive criticism against the broadcaster for deceiving viewers by how it spliced together footage of the US president.” 

Turkey Issues Arrest Warrants for Israel’s Leadership 

Turkiyetoday wrote on November 7: 

“Türkiye’s Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office issued arrest warrants Friday for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and 36 other suspects on charges of genocide related to Israel’s military operations in Gaza. The warrants target multiple high-ranking Israeli officials, including Defense Minister Israel Katz, National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir, Border and Security Minister Eyal Zamir, and Israeli Naval Forces Commander David Saar Salama… 

“The investigation centers on what Turkish authorities describe as systematic violence against civilians in Gaza. The prosecutor’s office cited specific incidents dating back to October 2023, including attacks on the Al-Ahli Baptist Hospital on Oct. 17, 2023, and damage to the Ebli Baptist Hospital on Oct. 21, 2023, which resulted in numerous civilian casualties. Turkish prosecutors also referenced the killing of aid workers from the World Central Kitchen on April 1, 2024, when several employees were struck during humanitarian operations. 

“Türkiye has been a vocal critic of Israel’s military campaign in Gaza, which began after Hamas’s attack on southern Israel in October 2023. The Turkish government has suspended diplomatic and trade relations with Israel over the conflict.” 

Turkey is being run by an autocrat, a dictator and a tyrant who supports the terror organization Hamas and who is accused of systemically persecuting, imprisoning, torturing and even assassinating his opponents. 

Deutsche Welle added on November 9: 

“Defense brings Turkey and Germany closer… Turkey is increasingly important for security in Europe. Germany is counting on cooperation with Turkey’s government to bolster defense…. ‘We would be delighted if our two defense industries could cooperate with each other,’ Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul said during a visit to Ankara weeks earlier. ‘You could almost ask: Who else would we work with on this?’” 

And so, according to the Bible, Turkey will ultimately help Europe, under German leadership, to occupy the state of Israel. 

The Vatican’s “Two-State Solution” 

Israel 365 News wrote on November 7: 

“Pope Leo XIV welcomed Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas to the Vatican on Thursday, continuing a decade-long pattern of papal support for dividing the Land of Israel. The meeting… centered on two key demands: humanitarian aid for Gaza and the establishment of a Palestinian state through a so-called two-state solution. 

“The ‘Two-State Solution’ is an agenda that would create an unprecedented militarized Palestinian enclave within Israel’s borders ethnically cleansed of Jews with its exclusively Muslim capital in Jerusalem… 

“The timing of this meeting is particularly significant. Abbas, now in his 19th year of what was supposed to be a four-year term, has repeatedly canceled elections and maintained power through increasingly authoritarian means. Yet the Vatican treated him as a legitimate head of state, dignifying his visit with a full hour in the pope’s private library at the Apostolic Palace… 

“The Vatican’s statement emphasized the ‘urgent need’ for a two-state solution, language that has become standard in these meetings. This marks the tenth anniversary of the Holy See’s formal recognition of ‘the State of Palestine’ through a comprehensive agreement signed in June 2015. That document represented the first time the Vatican used such terminology in a binding legal agreement, effectively treating Judea and Samaria—the Biblical heartland of the Jewish people—as occupied Palestinian territory. 

“Pope Leo has followed the path established by his predecessor, Francis, who met with Abbas seven times at the Vatican and once in Bethlehem. [In 2015] Francis presented Abbas with a medallion depicting ‘the angel of peace destroying the bad spirit of war,’ words that rang hollow given Abbas’s continued incitement against Israel and payments to families of terrorists. 

“The pattern extends beyond symbolism… The Vatican even displayed a nativity scene showing the baby Jesus lying on a keffiyeh, the symbol adopted by Palestinian nationalist movements. The scene was removed only after international backlash exposed its inflammatory nature. 

“… Pope Leo told Israeli President Isaac Herzog in September that a two-state solution represented ‘the only way out of the war.’ This ignores the fundamental reality: Israel’s enemies do not seek a state alongside Israel but a state instead of Israel… The Vatican’s decade of recognizing a Palestinian state has produced no peace, no reconciliation, and no acknowledgment of Jewish rights. It has only emboldened those who seek Israel’s destruction while providing diplomatic cover for a dictator who refuses to hold elections or make genuine peace. This is not the path to peace. It is the path to continued conflict, dressed in the language of compassion while ignoring justice.” 

The two-state “solution” is totally unrealistic and illusory. Neither the Jews nor the Palestinians want it. 

Pope Leo: ICE Separates Families 

Irish Star wrote on November 9: 

“U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance, who describes himself as a ‘baby Catholic,’ seems to be experiencing a rift with the Catholic Church due to the Trump administration’s treatment of migrants…  Pope Leo XIV publicly called on President Donald Trump and Vance to ‘allow pastoral workers to assist’ detained migrants… ‘Many times they have been separated from their families, and no one knows what happens,’ he said… 

“Assistant Homeland Security Secretary Tricia McLaughlin publicly rejected the pope’s statements, posting a response on X Wednesday morning… ICE ‘does not separate families,’ McLaughlin said… 

“McLaughlin’s claim that ICE ‘does not separate families’ comes under scrutiny. The Trump administration has separated thousands of families, beginning in Trump’s first term during his 2018 ‘zero tolerance’ crackdown. In Trump’s second term, since January 2025, ICE officers have referred more than 400 children to federal shelters as arrests ramped up—often telling parents to either self-deport with their kids or be separated, according to The Washington Post. 

“The New York Times in August documented at least nine ‘interior separation’ cases in which ICE detained parents who refused deportation flights and sent their children to federal custody or foster care.”

China Is Using Robots to Practice Attacking Taiwan 

Report 24 wrote on November 8: 

“China is already testing the robots that will fight the next war. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) sent four-legged ‘wolf robots’ storming the beaches of the Taiwan Strait – flanked by swarms of drones that pulverize enemy positions in seconds. The artificial soldier is no longer science fiction, but part of Beijing’s new military doctrine.

“What Chinese state television recently showed was nothing less than a glimpse into the future of warfare. A unit of the People’s Liberation Army conducted an amphibious landing exercise in which autonomous ground robots carried out the attack. These 70-kilogram machines… carry weapons, ammunition, or medical supplies and break down obstacles while being supported by swarms of so-called FPV drones… the entire attack chain – from target detection to destruction – took less than ten seconds. In one maneuver, a single soldier controlled nine robots and six drones simultaneously – a taste of the war of the future. 

“These ‘wolves of steel’ are intended to replace the human front, that first wave of attack that traditionally exacts the highest toll in lives. The difference: The robot knows no fear, no morality, no compassion. What Beijing is testing here is more than just a tactical tool—it’s an attempt to completely automate and robotize warfare… Now, combat robots and drones are meant to replace ‘human material.’ The enemy’s soldiers will then become cannon fodder. 

“But the test also revealed the limitations of this new type of weapon. The footage showed that while the robots moved nimbly across the sand, they were vulnerable and poorly camouflaged. Some were left lying in wait by fire, others were taken out by light weapons… Their range, armor, and communication security are considered inadequate. So, for now, the wolf is more of a show than a threat—but that was also the case with the first drones.” 

Such automated and autonomous robots, and similar ones, will certainly exist in large numbers in the future. The Bible contains a clear reference to horse-like robots in the Book of Revelation. Trump recently stated that President Xi Jinping assured him that China would not attack Taiwan as long as Trump was president. 

Side Effects of COVID-19 Vaccinations 

Report 24 wrote on November 4: 

“The side effects of COVID-19 vaccinations continue to receive little attention from those who were responsible for or supported the measures that infringed upon fundamental rights during the so-called pandemic. Freedom Party MEP Gerald Hauser is bringing the issue to the forefront: ‘I have repeatedly pointed out the massive side effects of the vaccinations in my books, lectures, and speeches in parliament. For years, this was rejected, covered up, and denied. But that’s no longer acceptable,’ he stated in a recent press release. Hauser considers the link between immune damage, cancer, and mRNA vaccinations to be sufficiently proven. 

“He refers to a remarkable research paper from South Korea: ‘A recent study confirms the already known data and casts a frightening light on COVID-19 vaccinations,’ warns Hauser. ‘More and more doctors in Europe are reporting a significant increase in cancer cases, with younger people increasingly affected and the cancers becoming ever more aggressive… Within just one year, a statistically significant increase in cancer cases was observed among those vaccinated – especially thyroid cancer (+35 percent), stomach cancer (+33.5 percent), colon cancer (+28 percent), lung cancer (+53 percent), breast cancer (+20 percent), and prostate cancer (+69 percent)…”

 Acknowledgement and Disclaimer: 

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

This Week in the News 

IDF Soldiers’ Third Temple Flags

Israel 365 News wrote on November 2: 

“The Israel Defense Forces announced it is investigating after troops in the 36th Division mounted flags calling for the construction of the Third Temple on heavy machinery operating in Gaza. The flags, which appeared on bulldozers and other engineering vehicles, were distributed by a reservist in violation of army protocol—yet they represent just the latest chapter in a broader story about religious expression within Israel’s military during wartime… 

“… in March, an image circulated showing a soldier alongside a Gazan child who had approached an IDF post before being safely returned. The soldier’s uniform prominently displayed both a ‘Moshiach’ patch and another depicting the Beit Hamikdash (Holy Temple)… 

“The symbolism points to the conflict’s essential focus. Hamas chose the Dome of the Rock with crossed swords as its emblem, naming one of its key militant factions the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade. The Islamic claim to Jerusalem’s Temple Mount sits at the ideological core of their war against Israel. When Israeli soldiers display Third Temple imagery, they are answering that claim with an equally uncompromising declaration: this land, and this mountain, belong to the Jewish people by divine right. 

“The IDF insists… that personal symbols have no place on official gear. Yet the repeated appearance of these emblems—despite official disapproval and direct intervention from top commanders—suggests something the IDF cannot regulate: the conviction among many Israeli soldiers that they are fighting a war with prophetic significance.” 

Netanyahu and the Israeli government—including the IDF—can resist the move towards building the third temple for only so long. 

UFOs and Demons 

The Guardian wrote on November 2: 

“Republican US house member Marjorie Taylor Greene has said she believes in demons, surmising that they might be aliens who fell from heaven… She made those bizarre remarks as a guest on Friday on HBO’s Real Time With Bill Maher… 

“Maher on Friday asked another of his on-air guests, film-maker Dan Farah, to discuss his new documentary, The Age of Disclosure, and how it explores the way some senior US military officials apparently theorize earnestly that ‘demons’ may be responsible for what some colloquially refer to as unidentified flying objects, or UFOs

“The Real Time host… subsequently asked those on the show: ‘Do you think demons and the devil are real?’ Greene… answered: ‘Absolutely. I’m a Bible-believing Christian. And I believe those could be fallen angels.’ As Maher replied: ‘Fallen angels? The aliens are fallen angels?’ Greene continued: ‘That’s possible – I think that’s what they could be. That’s what makes sense in my worldview.’” 

Greene is absolutely right. 

Trump’s Tariffs… Legal Or Not?

The Associated Press wrote on November 2: 

“President Donald Trump sees tariffs — or the threat of them — as a powerful tool to bend nations to his will. He has used them in an unprecedented way… He has wielded the import taxes as a threat to secure ceasefires from countries at war. He has used them to browbeat nations into promising to do more to stop people and drugs from flowing across their borders. He has used them, in Brazil’s case, as political pressure because its judicial system prosecuted a former leader who was a Trump ally, and in a recent blowup with Canada, as punishment for a television ad.

“This week, the Supreme Court hears arguments on whether the Republican president has overstepped federal law with many of his tariffs. A ruling against him could limit or even take away that swift and blunt leverage that much of his foreign policy has relied on. 

“Trump increasingly has expressed agitation and anxiety about the looming decision in a case he says is one of the most important in U.S. history. He has said it would be a ‘disaster’ for the United States if the justices fail to overturn lower court rulings that found he went too far in using an emergency powers law to put his tariffs in place… The courts left the tariffs in place while the Supreme Court considers the issue. Meanwhile, Trump has continued to wield them as he has tried to pressure or punish other countries on matters related — and unrelated — to trade… 

“For example, earlier this year Trump had threatened a 30% tariff on European imports, a major increase from 1.2% before he took office. Seeking to secure Trump’s support for the NATO military alliance and for security guarantees for Ukraine in its war with Russia, the European Union struck a deal to settle for 15% tariffs. The EU Commission faced criticism from businesses and member states for giving away too much… 

“Trump’s tariff strong-arming has rattled relationships with America’s friends and foes. Some have responded by becoming more protectionist or looking to foster relations with China… Some businesses have passed on some of the costs to consumers by raising prices…” 

Will the Supreme Court have the nerve to decide against Trump, since his tariffs policy seems to be clearly unconstitutional? 

Ronald Reagan Was Strongly Opposed to Tariffs 

National Post wrote on October 31: 

“There is arguably one problem with Ontario Premier Doug Ford’s TV ads using the words of Republican icon Ronald Reagan against Donald Trump: It didn’t quote [Reagan] enough. Reagan offered enough quotes about the dangers of tariffs and protectionism to fill an hour or more on Fox News. Some of them are even more devastating to Trump’s cause than those chosen by Ford…

“Welcoming Prime Minister Brian Mulroney to the White House, April 27, 1988: ‘We shall show by deed and dedication…that the lowering of tariffs and trade barriers is the way to a more prosperous world. Protectionism is out, and trade expansion is in’…

“Signing the Canada U.S. Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act, The White House, Sept. 28, 1988: 

“‘This agreement brings down the tariff walls between our two nations and, in so doing, creates the world’s largest free-trade area. Businesses and consumers in both our countries will have unprecedented freedom to choose among a staggering array of goods and services. It’ll mean lower prices for consumers, jobs galore for workers, and new markets for producers… It means a stronger and freer marketplace for the United States and Canada. There’ll be a rich flow of agriculture and energy resources from one country to the other in a way that will profit both. We also deal with the service sectors of our economies, providing for the first time an explicit assurance that in such areas as accounting, tourism, insurance, and engineering our peoples will be free to choose their suppliers.’” 

To even suggest that Reagan was for tariffs is ridiculous.

Being Anti-Trump Is Illegal??? 

Daily Mail wrote on November 2: 

“Donald Trump tore into Late Night’s Seth Meyers on Saturday, calling him a ‘deranged lunatic’ and suggested his criticism of the administration was ‘illegal’… 

Trump blasted the host for his comments in a post on Saturday… ‘Why does NBC waste its time and money on a guy like this???’ he asked, claiming Meyers has ‘NO TALENT, NO RATINGS’ and is ‘100 [percent] ANTI-TRUMP, WHICH IS PROBABLY ILLEGAL.’ 

“Meyers [accused] the Trump administration of ‘pursuing a crackdown on free speech,’ following Kimmel’s suspension in the face of threats from Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr.” 

These are dangerous words from Donald Trump. 

Pentagon’s Media Censorship 

Fox News reported on November 1: 

“The Pentagon… announced a new policy in which news outlets must agree to new press restrictions or lose their media credentials and Pentagon workspaces. 

“The policy requires journalists to pledge to the new rules, including that they could be deemed security risks and have their Pentagon press badges revoked if they ask employees to disclose information that has not been released by the department, even if the information is unclassified

At least 30 news outlets, including Fox News, refused to agree to the Pentagon media restrictions, asserting that the policy represents a threat to press freedom and hinders their ability to conduct independent newsgathering

“Additionally, the Trump administration earlier this year removed Reuters, The Associated Press and Bloomberg News from the permanent ‘pool’ of reporters covering the president, although those outlets may still be included on a sporadic basis.” 

Censorship in America! Law professor Jonathan Turley commented in a Fox News interview that these policies are “a bridge too far.” 

ICE Arrests in Court Houses Illegal? 

Breitbart wrote on November 1: 

“Joining at least two other Democrat-run states, Illinois lawmakers passed a bill on Friday prohibiting federal immigration agents from arresting illegal aliens near and around state courthouses. The Illinois bill, sent to… Gov. JB Pritzker for signing, not only seeks to prevent Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations inside courthouses but establishes a 1,000-foot ‘buffer zone’ outside of buildings… 

“Earlier this month, a Cook County judge blocked immigration arrests at county courthouses, which include Chicago. The order prohibits immigration authorities from arresting any ‘party, witness, or potential witness’ during court appearances… California has restricted immigration enforcement action in courthouses since 2017. In Connecticut, a chief judge for the state’s supreme court issued a policy ruling earlier this fall banning warrantless arrests inside state courts… ICE officers have arrested immigrants in or around courthouses in at least seven different states…” 

How could these state decisions be enforced against ICE? 

ICE Not Going Far Enough???? 

The Independent wrote on November 3: 

“President Donald Trump said that Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids ‘haven’t gone far enough’ when confronted with questions about the agency’s aggressive tactics on CBS News program 60 Minutes. During the interview…, the president was confronted by anchor Norah O’Donnel  about ICE agents’ tactics, which over the past 10 months have included ramming cars in pursuit of suspects, sledgehammering windows, raiding churches, and getting heavy-handed with protesters. 

“‘Americans have been watching videos of ICE tackling a young mother, tear gas being used in a Chicago residential neighborhood, and the smashing of car windows,’ O’Donnell said. ‘Have some of these raids gone too far?’ ‘No, I think they haven’t gone far enough,’ Trump replied. 

“O’Donnell referenced an incident where an ICE agent tackled a crying woman to the ground inside the halls of an immigration courthouse in downtown Manhattan in front of her two young children in September. The agent was relieved of his duties. O’Donnell asked the president whether he was ‘okay with those tactics.’ ‘Yeah, because you have to get the people out,’ Trump said. ‘Many of them are murderers.’ 

“The president was pressed further by O’Donnell about how the administration has largely deported ‘landscapers, nannies, construction workers…’ ‘Landscapers who are criminals,’ Trump interrupted. 

“Trump went on to blame ‘liberal judges’ appointed by his Democratic predecessors, former presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden… According to a recent review by Politico, more than 100 federal judges have ruled against the Trump administration’s efforts to detain and deport immigrants. The judges ruled at least 200 times that the administration’s actions violated people’s rights or were ‘just flatly illegal,’ according to the outlet.” 

Does Trump really know what he is talking about? In the interview, he also claimed that he did not know a man (Changpeng Zhao) whom he had just pardoned two weeks ago.

Pope’s Reflection on Trump’s Immigration Policy

Reuters wrote on November 4:

“Pope Leo called on Tuesday for ‘deep reflection’ about the way migrants are being treated in the United States under President Donald Trump’s administration and said the spiritual needs of those in detention needed to be respected… Leo… cited Matthew’s gospel, chapter 25.

“‘Jesus says very clearly at the end of the world, we’re going to be asked, you know, how did you receive the foreigner? Did you receive him and welcome him or not? And I think that there’s a deep reflection that needs to be made in terms of what’s happening,’ the pontiff said. ‘Many people who’ve lived for years and years and years, never causing problems, have been deeply affected by what’s going on right now,’ he added.”

Pope Leo is absolutely right on this.

Stephen Miller’s Dubious Role

The Independent wrote on October 31: 

“White House homeland security adviser… Stephen Miller holds secret calls with diplomats every day in order to push the Trump administration’s aggressive immigration agenda across the globe… [He pressures ] officials on visa and immigration issues, as well as pushing for negotiations with third countries to accept deportees from the U.S. who cannot be returned to their country of origin. 

“Miller has also lobbied for the revocation of individual visas for critics of Israel or MAGA influencer Charlie Kirk…  Miller… has been reported to have pushed ICE officials to conduct up to 3,000 immigration arrests per day.” 

A dangerous man… and clearly not just an “adviser.” 

Dreamers Face Uncertain Future 

The Guardian wrote on November 1: 

“A federal judge could soon decide whether tens of thousands of so-called ‘Dreamers’ in Texas could lose their ability to work in the US legally under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (Daca) immigration program – prompting fears of upheaval and heartbreak… 

“Created in 2012, Daca currently provides deportation protections and work permits to more than 500,000 immigrants who, as children, entered the US without permission or overstayed their visas. To qualify, they all had to have arrived before 2007, attend an American high school or enlist in the military, and pass background checks. The average age of those enrolled in Daca is now 31. After California, Texas is the home to the second largest Daca population in the country, with 86,000 recipients living there. 

“But what has remained a lifeline for an entire generation of young adults – in the absence of Congress being willing to pass legislation to embed the protections in law – many of whom are now raising families and building professional careers, continues to be in legal peril, especially in Texas… 

“The Daca program has survived years of uncertainty. During Donald Trump’s first term, his administration tried to terminate Daca, declaring it an illegal program. But its effort was blocked, ultimately by the US supreme court, which in 2020 halted the termination on technical grounds… 

“At the national level, as employers and employees, Daca recipients have contributed nearly $2.1bn each year to social security and Medicare, programs that benefit all Americans… Since the turn of the century, lawmakers have introduced at least 20 versions of the ‘Dream Act’, which would place Dreamers on a path to US citizenship. Despite garnering bipartisan support, the proposals have all died in Congress.” 

This is so shameful for America. 

Partial Assistance of SNAP Recipients 

The New York Post wrote on November 3: 

“The federal food stamp program will pay out partial benefits to millions of Americans despite running out of regular funding at the start of this month due to the ongoing government shutdown, the Trump administration confirmed in court documents Monday. 

“The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) will receive about 50% of its normal benefit level throughout November, using a contingency fund set aside for natural disasters and other emergencies… SNAP has about $4.65 billion in its contingency fund — a little more than half of the $8 billion the feds spend on SNAP benefits for approximately 42 million Americans each month. Normally, beneficiaries receive about $190 per month in assistance.” 

Confusion Galore 

Yahoo!News wrote on November 4: 

“The White House on Tuesday said Americans will receive SNAP benefits, ‘fully complying’ with a recent court order, after President Trump earlier said his administration would withhold benefits until the government shutdown ended, sparking confusion… 

“Earlier on Tuesday, Trump wrote in a social media post that SNAP benefits would not be sent out as long as the government remains shut down. The president wrote in part that the food aid benefits ‘will be given only when the Radical Left Democrats open up government, which they can easily do, and not before!’ 

“Trump’s post contradicts a court filing made by his administration on Monday, saying that it would partially fund SNAP benefits for November but did not specify how much individual food stamp recipients will receive or when they might be able to access them… Benefits for more than 40 million Americans who are enrolled in SNAP, also known as food stamps, did not go out as scheduled on Saturday because of the government shutdown… 

“The administration considered pulling money from other programs to fully fund November SNAP benefits, specifically a program that provides free and reduced-cost lunches for schoolchildren, but ultimately determined that would pose an ‘unacceptable risk’ to food security across the country… Uncertainty over SNAP won’t end for good until the government reopens…” 

Also, in America’s longest shutdown ever, 13,000 air traffic controllers and 50,000 TSA officers are supposed to report for work without being paid. Many work overtime, while others call in sick, causing incredible delays. Trump has warned that if the Republicans don’t get rid of the filibuster [to end the appalling shutdown], they will lose the midterm election next year. Given Trump’s high disapproval rating, they might lose it anyway.   

Not Much Confidence in the Future 

Politico wrote on November 2: 

“In a bitterly divided country, pessimism and cynicism reign supreme: Two-thirds of Americans say it is at least probably true that the government often deliberately lies to the people. That distrust cuts across partisan lines… 

“Nearly half of Americans, 49 percent, say that the best times of the country are behind them… underscoring a pervasive sense of unease about both individuals’ own futures and the national direction… 

“Overall, almost half — 46 percent — of Americans said that the American Dream no longer exists. That was by far the most common answer, far greater than the 26 percent who disagreed.” 

The magazine also pointed out that “Most Americans [55 percent] expect political violence to keep growing in the United States… [and] a significant minority of the population — 24 percent — believes that there are some instances where violence is justified.” 

Tucker Carlson’s Interview With Nick Fuentes 

Wired wrote on November 4: 

“Nick Fuentes, a white nationalist known for his deeply antisemitic, racist, and misogynist [hatred, dislike or prejudice against women] worldview, just might be tearing the Republican party apart. The schism was triggered last Tuesday when former Fox News host Tucker Carlson released an in-depth interview with Fuentes, the leader of the so-called America First movement who has denied the Holocaust [and] praised Hitler…

“During the interview, Fuentes waxed antisemitic about the threat apparently posed by ‘organized Jewry’ in America, while Carlson slammed figures like Senator Ted Cruz and former president George W. Bush as being ‘Christian Zionists’ who have been ‘seized by this brain virus.’ Carlson was criticized by, among others, US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee for giving Fuentes a platform, and the argument kicked into overdrive after Kevin Roberts, president of the Heritage Foundation, a high-profile conservative think tank, condemned those attacking Carlson as a ‘venomous coalition.’…

“Roberts’ comments… triggered a massive split on the right, with everyone from prominent podcasters and influencers to senators and other lawmakers weighing in to attack or defend Roberts and Carlson. The debate continued to rage over the weekend as many claimed the situation was a reflection of a broader concern about a perceived rise in antisemitism within the MAGA movement… 

“On Monday, prominent right-wing podcaster Ben Shapiro [who is Jewish] dedicated his entire show to the ‘fragmentation of the political right,’ claiming it is ‘being caused purposefully by a splinter faction of people led by a young man named Nick Fuentes.’…  Fuentes replied by writing: ‘No to Ben Shapiro … No to Benjamin Netanyahu … No to genocide and ethnic cleansing. No to the Christ-hating Talmud. No to Greater Israel. No to our Jewish oligarchy.’… 

“In recent months, Fuentes’ follower numbers on platforms like X and the alternative video sharing platform Rumble have skyrocketed…” 

Incredibly Popular

The Wrap wrote on November 3: 

“Tucker Carlson’s decision… to interview 27-year-old white nationalist Nick Fuentes for over two hours last week sent shockwaves through conservative media circles, with everyone from the Daily Wire’s Ben Shapiro to Bari Weiss’ the Free Press to the editorial board of Rupert Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal eviscerating the former Fox News host for platforming a far-right figure who’s made his hatred of Jews a facet of his appeal….

“But Carlson’s failure to seriously challenge Fuentes doesn’t seem to have hurt his popularity. His podcast still ranked at No. 2 on Spotify’s podcast charts on Monday, and the YouTube post of the interview has 5.1 million views. His X post with the two-hour conversation? 17.3 million.” 

Fuentes Kirk’s Successor? 

The New York Times wrote on November 3: 

“Charlie Kirk, the conservative influencer who was assassinated in September, and Nick Fuentes, the young Hitler-loving white nationalist at the center of a growing schism on the right, were bitter enemies. Fuentes despised Kirk for his support of Israel… 

“After Kirk was murdered, Fuentes… continued his attacks on Turning Point… powerful conservatives were engaged in a nationwide campaign to canonize Kirk and destroy progressives who maligned him… In such an atmosphere, one might think that Fuentes’s stock on the right would have fallen. Instead, it’s risen higher than ever, revealing a seemingly unstoppable ratchet of radicalization on the right… 

“‘Jews are running society, women need to shut up,’ he said [in March]… ‘Blacks need to be imprisoned for the most part.’ His sneering, proudly transgressive attitude has made him a hero to legions of mostly young men who resent all forms of political gatekeeping… [All of this] leads inexorably to Groyperism [followers of Fuentes, a variant on the alt-right Pepe the Frog meme], and the elevation of Fuentes, Kirk’s foe, into his successor.” 

Anti-Semitism on the left is well-known [note next articles]. But now comes Fuentes on the right. 

Democratic Socialist Zohran Mamdani New Mayor of New York City 

Newsmax wrote on November 4: 

“Democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani has been elected mayor of New York City… The earthshaking result makes Mamdani the first Muslim mayor in the city’s history. His victory cements the left’s grip on the city’s Democrat base and signals a national shift in urban politics. But critics warn his expansive spending plans could drive out businesses and accelerate New York’s fiscal decline. 

“Mamdani… ran on an unabashedly socialist platform promising fare-free buses, universal childcare, a city-run grocery store in each borough, a $30 minimum wage by 2030, and new taxes on corporations and high earners. He has been branded a socialist and communist by many critics, including President Donald Trump, who labeled Mamdani a ‘100% Communist lunatic’ in a June 25 post on Truth Social. 

“Trump also said Monday on Truth Social that it was ‘highly unlikely’ he would contribute federal funds ‘other than the very minimum as required’ to New York City should Mamdani be elected mayor… 

“Almost 800,000 New Yorkers said they would flee the city if Mamdani won… 9% of New Yorkers would ‘definitely’ leave the city, which has a population of roughly 8.5 million.

“It also raises a big question regarding the city’s Jewish community, the largest in the world outside of Israel. Anti-Israel politics have been a driving force in Mamdani’s life… 

“He has repeated his contention that he would use NYPD resources to arrest Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, following the International Criminal Court’s warrant over alleged war crimes in the Gaza Strip. 

“Political analysts said Mamdani’s victory could deepen the ideological divide within the Democratic Party and test whether New York can sustain a socialist experiment amid rising debt and public-safety fears.” 

The Jerusalem Post wrote on November 4, prior to Mamdani’s confirmed victory: 

“Mamdani has been called a ‘raging antisemite, a terrorist sympathizer, an ardent socialist, and a polarizing figure’ – language that reflects why the campaign has become a global story. 

“Mamdani’s own words have amplified concerns. In 2021…, he said anti-Israel BDS activism [was] the ‘crux of the reason’ he joined the Democratic Socialists of America… And in October, he wrote that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had ‘launched a genocidal war,’ framing Israel’s actions in the most extreme moral terms… 

“If he wins, this is a clear message for the Democratic Party: Antisemites can lead; they are no longer in the margins. This means that being a supporter of a boycott of Israel – not just West Bank goods but also sovereign Israel – is normal. This means that globalizing the intifada, as he calls it, is a relevant call for destroying the only Jewish state in the world, while dozens of Arab and Muslim states already exist… If Mamdani wins, this is a very bad situation for Jews, for Israel, and for America.” 

Still, many Jews voted for him. Trump called them “stupid.” 

Dick Cheney’s Controversial Legacy 

The Daily Mail wrote on November 4: 

“Some Republicans joined liberals in expressing little sorrow over the death of former Vice President Dick Cheney. Cheney, one of the most polarizing political figures in modern US history, died on Monday night at the age of 84 due to complications from pneumonia and cardiac and vascular disease. 

“The former vice president was the architect of the Iraq war following the 9/11 terrorist attacks under the George Bush administration. Liberals criticized Cheney throughout his vice presidential terms, gifting him the infamous nickname ‘Darth Vader.’ In recent years, however, Cheney found new enemies on the MAGA right after endorsing Kamala Harris over Donald Trump in the 2024 election…  

“Near the end of his vice presidential career, Cheney often faced allegations of being a ‘war criminal’ for his role in pushing the Iraq war… ‘Dick Cheney just died. The man who killed over a million innocent civilians to see his Halliburton stock go up,’ said popular right-wing X account Kim Dotcom. Popular conservative X account Tony Sergua added, ‘He lied about weapons of mass destruction. He is the reason so many American soldiers died or where maimed.’.. 

“Trump… has had a very contentious relationship with the Cheney family… Cheney’s eldest daughter, former Rep. Liz Cheney led the impeachment effort and subsequent January 6th investigation committee, following the 2021 Capitol riot. Trump reacted by pushing for Cheney’s ouster from House GOP leadership and defeating her in a primary election by backing Cheney’s opponent.” 

Cheney was probably the most unpopular and hated US politician in Europe. 

UN Accuses USA of Breaking the Law 

ABC News wrote on October 31: 

“The United Nations said Friday that U.S. airstrikes on alleged drug trafficking boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific Ocean violate international human rights law and must stop… U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk said that the attacks breach international law and called for an investigation into the strikes… 

“‘Under international human rights law, the intentional use of lethal force is only permissible as a last resort against individuals who pose an imminent threat to life,’ he added. ‘Based on the very sparse information provided publicly by the U.S. authorities, none of the individuals on the targeted boats appeared to pose an imminent threat to the lives of others or otherwise justified the use of lethal armed force against them under international law.’…

“Since September, President Donald Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth have executed over a dozen military strikes against boats in the Caribbean and Eastern Pacific, arguing they are anti-drug and counter-terrorism measures. Over 60 people have allegedly been killed in the strikes, according to U.S. officials.”

In this case, the UN is correct.  

US Tomahawks for Ukraine? 

CNN wrote on October 31 

“The Pentagon has given the White House the green light to provide Ukraine with long-range Tomahawk missiles after assessing that it would not negatively impact US stockpiles, leaving the final political decision in President Donald Trump’s hands… 

“The assessment buoyed the US’ European allies, who believe that the US now has fewer excuses not to provide the missiles.. 

“While the Pentagon doesn’t have concerns about stockpiles, US defense officials are still grappling with how Ukraine would train on and deploy the missiles. There are still several operational issues that would need to be resolved for Ukraine to be able to use the missiles effectively… One outstanding question is how Ukraine would fire the missiles if the US provided them. Tomahawks are most commonly launched from surface ships or submarines, but Ukraine’s Navy is severely depletedso the missiles would likely need to be launched on land.” 

No Tomahawk Missiles? 

Thomson/Reuters wrote on November 2: 

“President Donald Trump said on Sunday that, for now, he is not considering a deal that would allow Ukraine to obtain long-range Tomahawk missiles for use against Russia… He added, however, that he could change his mind. 

“Tomahawk missiles have a range of 2,500 km (1,550 miles), long enough to strike deep inside Russia, including Moscow…” 

It does not appear that the war between Russia and Ukraine will end anytime soon. 

Putin’s New Terrifying Nuclear Submarine 

Daily Mail wrote on November 3: 

“Vladimir Putin has unveiled his new terrifying nuclear submarine, built to carry a doomsday weapon capable of unleashing a radioactive tidal wave. The hulking Khabarovsk, which ramps up the tyrant’s threats of World War Three, is equipped to fire Russia’s notorious Poseidon nuclear drone at Western coastlines… The Poseidon… is capable of travelling up to 6,200 miles with a speed of 115miles per hour deep underwater… 

“Jeffrey Lewis, a scholar at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies, wrote in Foreign Policy: ‘It’s downright terrifying. We’re talking about a massive, megaton-sized thermonuclear weapon designed to produce significant, long-lasting radiation effects.’ Other officials have also warned that the weapon could be fired from unexpected directions.   

“It was reported that this prompted US president Donald Trump to order his country’s military to restart nuclear tests for the first time in 33 years.  

He wrote: ‘Because of other countries’ testing programs, I have instructed the Department of War to start testing our Nuclear Weapons on an equal basis. That process will begin immediately.’”

Trump also claimed that Russia and China are carrying out secret underground doomsday nuclear weapons testing. We are getting closer to outright nuclear war which could destroy all life on earth.

No Non-Aggression Pact? 

NachDenkSeiten wrote on October 31: 

“Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov declared this week in Minsk that Moscow is prepared to provide EU and NATO countries with legally binding security guarantees that it will not attack them… He stated verbatim: ‘We have repeatedly stated that we do not intend, and never have, to attack any of the current NATO or EU members. We are prepared to enshrine this position in future security guarantees for this part of Eurasia.’

“The German government’s response [on October 29] to the corresponding question from NachDenkSeiten at the Federal Press Conference reads as follows… 

“Question: ‘Do I understand you correctly that you do not intend to accept this proposal from the Russian side for a de facto non-aggression pact with EU and NATO states for the time being?’ 

“Answer: ‘You understand me perfectly well that the Russian side must end its war, which it has been waging for some time now without any cause or justification against a sovereign neighboring country. The German government is striving for a ceasefire, an end to these hostilities.’” 

Mysterious Drones Over Belgium 

EU News wrote on November 3: 

“Unidentified drone overflights continue in the heart of Europe. Belgium now appears to be the latest victim, following the incidents of a few weeks ago. Sightings were repeated during the night between Friday (October 31) and Saturday, and again between Saturday and Sunday. This time, the aircraft flew over the Kleine Brogel military base, 100 kilometers from Brussels, and another approached Antwerp airport…. Who is behind the operations is still unclear…

“The episode is concerning because it is not an isolated case. Earlier this month, several drones flew over the Elsenborn military camp, and a similar incident occurred in the skies above Marche-en-Famenne, where the Ardennes Light Infantry is stationed. This weekend’s event raises the bar by targeting Belgium’s most extensive military base at Kleine Brogel. Here, according to some NATO sources, US nuclear warheads are present, and the most technologically advanced elements of the Belgian army are deployed… 

“According to initial reconstructions, the overflight occurred at a high altitude. The Belgian armed forces attempted to interfere by jamming (releasing electromagnetic waves) techniques to shoot down the aircraft, but the attempt was unsuccessful. In addition, to disrupt the overflight, a Belgian Air Force helicopter took off in pursuit of the drone, but it managed to escape. The failure testifies to the fact that the European armed forces are only partly prepared to counter threats from the sky.” 

Quite embarrassing for Belgium’s “defense” capabilities… 

Reuters added on November 4: 

“Brussels Airport is closed after the reported sighting of a drone, said the Belgian air traffic control service and a spokeswoman for the airport. ‘There are no flights currently landing or taking off,’ said the spokeswoman, adding she could not estimate for how long the airport would remain closed. 

“The smaller Liege Airport also said it was currently closed after drones had been seen… In September, Copenhagen Airport and Oslo Airport had to be closed briefly as a result of drone sightings.” 

Elections in the Netherlands 

BBC wrote on October 31: 

“Centrist liberal leader Rob Jetten has claimed victory in Wednesday’s nail-biting Dutch election, after vote analysis indicated his party could not be beaten by anti-Islam populist Geert Wilders… No Dutch election race has ever been so close… He will need the support of at least three other parties to gather the 76 seats needed to form a coalition… 

“Wilders won the last election in November 2023, and a government was only formed in July 2024. Eleven months later, he brought his own government down, in a row with his coalition partners over asylum and migration policy.” 

Pride wrote on October 31: 

“Gays on the internet have turned into rabid fans of gay politician Rob Jetten, who just won the election to become the Netherlands’ youngest prime minister… he is also dating [a] male athlete who is nine years his junior, and he is the first openly gay prime minister in the country’s history… Nicolás ‘Nico’ Keenan is a 28-year-old bisexual field hockey player who is now set to become the first gentleman of the Netherlands… 

“Jetten and Keenan publicly hard launched their relationship in 2023 and then announced their engagement the following year with a photo taken in Paris during the Olympics, captioned, ‘Soon we will be Mr & Mr.’ [They] plan to get married next year.” 

The Netherlands belongs to the House of Israel—called modern “Sodom” in the Bible. 

Proceedings Against Reichelt Dropped 

Die Welt wrote on October 30: 

“The Berlin public prosecutor’s office has dropped its investigation into ‘Nius’ editor-in-chief Julian Reichelt on suspicion of incitement to hatred. ‘The initial suspicion was not substantiated,’ a spokesperson for the authority told the German Press Agency (dpa)… 

“Regarding the discontinuation of the proceedings, [Attorney] Steinhöfel commented: ‘When an investigation is opened and then discontinued almost minutes later… after it has become public, the question of the professional competence of those involved arises with great urgency.’”… 

And, of course, the question of political motivation. 

Further Measures Against Opposition 

Nius wrote on November 1: 

“The Freiburg public prosecutor’s office has filed charges of defamation against an 18-year-old student… 

“The trigger: In February 2025, the officer gave a lecture to a class at the Angell Gymnasium entitled ‘Defending Democracy – But How?’ The student, who had previously co-founded a student newspaper that called for protests against the Bundeswehr visit, subsequently posted a meme on Instagram. It showed the officer in front of the class with the punchline: ‘So, children, who among you would like to die on the Eastern Front?’ Supporters of the accused see this as an ‘ironic exaggeration of the Bundeswehr’s recruitment strategy in schools’… 

“Student protests against appearances by the German Armed Forces at schools are not isolated incidents nationwide. In Leipzig, for example, young people mobilized before a military presentation at the school; a 16-year-old was threatened with expulsion.”

The accusations are absurd, but they demonstrate the lengths to which some are willing to go to suppress dissent. The fact that the German Armed Forces are allowed to conduct their war propaganda in schools and that students are obligated to listen to it is outrageous. 

Reciting “Hateful” Bible Verses Illegal? 

Life Site News wrote on November 1: 

“A leading member of Canada’s Parliament said that certain passages of the Bible are ‘hateful’ because of their stance towards homosexuality, and further suggested that publicly reciting those passages should be prosecuted

“During a Thursday, October 30 discussion in Ottawa about hate propaganda laws, Marc Miller, a current member of Canada’s House of Commons and the Chairman of the Committee on Justice and Human Rights, pushed the idea that ‘good faith’ defenses were unacceptable when it comes to Christians referring to passages of the Bible that he personally finds ‘hateful.’ 

“In Leviticus, Deuteronomy, Romans — there’s other passages — there’s clear hatred towards, for example, homosexuals,’ insisted Miller. ‘I don’t understand how the concept of good faith can be invoked if someone were literally invoking a passage from, in this case, the Bible… there should perhaps be discretion for prosecutors to press charges,’ averred Miller…’” 

It is true: God HATES sinful conduct.

Acknowledgement and Disclaimer: 

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

This Week in the News 

Cutting Ties With Israel?

Newsmax wrote on October 23:

“President Donald Trump said the United States would cut ties with Israel if the Jewish state attempted to annex the West Bank. Trump made the remark in an interview with Time magazine conducted Oct. 15 at the White House and published Thursday. The interview occurred about a week before Israel’s Knesset advanced legislation to annex the territory. 

“‘It won’t happen. It won’t happen,’ Trump told Time. ‘It won’t happen because I gave my word to the Arab countries… Israel would lose all of its support from the United States if that happened.’ 

“In what is seen as an embarrassment to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Knesset on Wednesday gave preliminary approval to a bill that would extend Israeli sovereignty to all West Bank settlements…  It also passed a more limited bill to annex a major settlement city. The votes came despite opposition from Netanyahu and most of his Likud party. They argued the move was ill-timed, given the fragility of a ceasefire deal brokered by the Trump administration between Israel and Iranian-backed Hamas terrorists. 

“Vice President JD Vance said Thursday, before leaving Israel, that he was ‘insulted’ by the Knesset vote. Vance told reporters… that he was told the measure was merely symbolic and part of a ‘political stunt with no practical significance… If it was a political stunt, it was a stupid one, and I take some insult to it,’ Vance said. He emphasized that the Trump administration’s policy is that ‘the West Bank is not going to be annexed by Israel.’ 

“Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Wednesday night that the Knesset’s move toward annexation could threaten Trump’s plan to end the two-year-old conflict in the Gaza Strip. ‘The president has made clear that’s not something we’d be supportive of right now,’ Rubio told reporters before departing for Israel. ‘We think there’s potential for [it to be] threatening to the peace deal.’” 

Rubio’s emphasis on “right now” is interesting. 

Does Trump Plan to Build the Third Temple? 

Israel 365 News wrote on October 24: 

“Eyebrows were raised when a question about rebuilding the Beit HaMikdash (Holy Temple) was asked in the White House press briefing room on Thursday, bringing a subject usually found in Jewish study halls and prophetic discussions directly into U.S. political conversation. Mishpacha’s White House correspondent, Jake Turx, asked Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt whether President Donald Trump had ever discussed the prospect of supporting the Temple’s reconstruction in Jerusalem… after noting Trump’s reputation for large-scale building projects and his newly revealed plans for a White House ballroom… 

“Leavitt pointedly did not reject the possibility that the president and real-estate tycoon would consider the project, responding, instead, ‘It has not. No it hasn’t. I’m sorry, Jake.’ The exchange was brief, but it immediately recalled one of the most symbolically potent moments of Trump’s first term: the move of the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem in May 2018… Following the embassy move, the Sanhedrin minted a ceremonial coin depicting Trump alongside the Persian King Cyrus, who facilitated the Jewish people’s return from Babylonian exile and rebuilding the Second Temple… 

“The idea of a Third Temple is not speculative within the Hebrew Bible… Several years ago, mentioning the Temple in a White House briefing would have been treated as marginal. Today, it was asked plainly — without laughter, without dismissal, and without scandal.” 

The press reported in some articles that Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt had said that Trump will not build the Third Temple. This, the White House has clearly NOT said. The twists and misrepresentations of the mass media are staggering.

“Welcome to Hotel Hamas”

 The Daily Mail wrote on October 25: 

“Hamas terrorists released under the Gaza peace deal are staying in a five-star hotel [the Marriott’s Renaissance Cairo Mirage City Hotel] alongside unsuspecting Western tourists. Experts warned of a radical new threat to global security after the Daily Mail tracked down more than 150 of the highly dangerous extremists to a luxury hotel in Cairo. Israel was forced to empty its prisons of nearly all its most feared jihadists held on life sentences as part of Donald Trump’s 20-point peace plan… 

“Undercover journalists booked into the resort and stayed amongst the murderous jihadists, who include a member of Isis and a senior Hamas special forces commander… The Daily Mail understands that some may soon be moved on to live in nearby tourist destinations such as Qatar, Turkey and Tunisia which are hugely popular with British holidaymakers… 

“Professor Anthony Glees, emeritus professor at the University of Buckingham, said: ‘These people are our sworn enemies. They will cut off the heads of British soldiers and kill left, right and centre… 

“A former Israeli intelligence officer known as Guy C added: ‘There are no restrictions on their movements in these countries. They can walk freely, travel to Europe – even the UK… The first thing these terrorists will do when they reach Turkey or Qatar is contact their associates in Gaza and the West Bank to send money and re-establish their networks. They will quickly regroup and form new terror cells.’”

Hamas won’t go away. For Israel to have to set free “nearly all its most feared jihadists held on life sentences” was insane and terribly short-sighted.

Gaza Ceasefire Over? 

Yeshiva World News wrote on October 28: 

“Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has ordered the IDF to carry out immediate, powerful strikes in the Gaza Strip. The directive comes after an incident in Rafah earlier today in which terrorists opened fire on IDF forces. At least one soldier was seriously wounded in the attack and evacuated for medical treatment. 

“The escalation follows mounting tensions over the handling of hostages’ remains. Last night Hamas returned remains that Israel says were already buried, yet claimed they were a newly recovered body — fueling Israeli outrage and contributing to today’s security response.” 

NBC News wrote on October 29: 

“Israel said Wednesday that the ceasefire in the Gaza Strip was back on after it carried out intense strikes across the Palestinian enclave that killed 100 people… The Israeli military said it had ‘begun the renewed enforcement’ of the fragile ceasefire…”

Trump’s Third Term? 

The New Republic wrote on October 24: 

“… commentator and former Donald Trump adviser Steve Bannon says the president will serve a third term despite being barred by the Constitution. In a video interview with The Economist published Thursday, Bannon said, ‘Well, he’s gonna get a third term… Trump is gonna be president in ’28, and people ought to just get accommodated with that’… brushing off concerns about the Twenty-Eight Amendment. ‘There’s many different alternatives. At the appropriate time, we’ll lay out what the plan is, but there’s a plan and President Trump will be the president in ’28,’ Bannon added… 

“It’s not even the first time Bannon has mentioned plans to keep Trump in office longer [he spoke about this in an interview earlier this month]… One of Trump’s lawyers was also exploring the possibility of Trump violating the Constitution’s term limits back in 2023, and Trump encouraged calls for a third term at a Michigan rally in April. The response from other conservatives, such as Senator Lindsey Graham and even Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett has not been reassuring.   

“While Trump has claimed to be ‘joking,’ he still is selling ‘Trump 2028’ merchandise, and should be taken seriously…” 

We don’t believe either that Trump is just joking about this.

Trump Would Not Run for Vice President 

Newsmax wrote on October 27: 

“President Donald Trump said on Monday he would rule out running for the vice presidency in the 2028 U.S. election, an approach some of his supporters have floated to allow the Republican president to serve an additional term in office. ‘I’d be allowed to do that,’ Trump said, in an exchange with reporters aboard Air Force One. But he added: ‘I wouldn’t do that. I think it’s too cute… I think the people wouldn’t like that… it wouldn’t be right.’… 

“Some have suggested… for Trump to stand as vice president, while another candidate stood for president and resigned, letting Trump again assume the presidency.” 

Trump’s $300+ Million Ballroom 

The Daily Mail wrote on October 25:

“The White House has stated that the [$300million] ballroom will be completed before Trump leaves office in January 2029 but have not offered a specific timeline. Experts have said that this goal is ambitious… 

“Trump has repeatedly claimed he plans to donate millions of dollars of his own to the ballroom’s construction. The project’s private donors includes executives from world’s top technology corporations, including Google, Meta, Amazon, and Microsoft.  

“As part of the ballroom’s construction, the entire East Wing of the White House was destroyed. Trump had originally claimed that the 83-year-old building wouldn’t be touched in the construction of the… privately funded ballroom. But when a backhoe was pictured on Monday smashing through the walls of the historic building, it set off alarm bells. 

“First Lady Melania Trump, meanwhile, has been silent about the demolition despite the fact the East Wing holds the offices of her entire staff.” 

Is Trump really constructing the ballroom just for his successor? 

Denaturalizing American Citizens? 

The New York Post wrote on October 25: 

“House Republicans want to strip Zohran Mamdani of citizenship, possibly deport NYC mayoral frontrunner over form omissions… Rep. Randy Fine (R-Fla.) last week demanded the feds ‘review every naturalization of the past 30 years – starting with Mamdani.’ ‘I just think we need to take a hard look at how these folks became citizens, and if there is any fraud or any violation of the rules we need to denaturalize and deport,’ Fine told the Post. 

“Democratic Socialist Zohran Mamdani became a US Citizen after moving here as a child from Uganda. A pair of House Republicans want him probed for possible ‘denaturalization’ for making allegedly false statements during his process… [Fine] also called for a probe of anti-Israel ‘Squad’ member Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), who was born in Somalia and is one of the first two women Muslims to serve in Congress. 

“Mamdani is a threat to the nation, he continued. ‘I know that there’s a lot of us that are very, very concerned about the enemy within – people who have come to this country to become citizens, to destroy it.’ He dismissed logistical concerns about yanking the citizenship of naturalized Americans after they got elected to top jobs. ‘If they’re not Americans, they can’t be in office,’ he said… 

“Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.) has pushed for a Justice Department probe of Mamdani… ‘In 2018 when he was naturalized, he failed to disclose some of the things that he had been doing, one of which was joining the [Democratic] Socialists of America. That’s a communist organization which, quite frankly, at that time, would have disqualified him from becoming a United States citizen,’ Ogles told Newsmax… 

“US immigration law declares inadmissible those who have ‘been a member of or affiliated with the Communist or any other totalitarian party.’ The current form asks would-be citizens to disclose if they have ever been associated ‘in any way’ with ‘any Communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world.’ President Trump has called Mamdani a ‘communist lunatic.’ Mamdani specifically denies being a communist. 

Are we going to see a repeat of the McCarthy communist witch hunt? The McCarthy communist ‘witch hunt’ refers to the aggressive anti-communist campaign led by Senator Joseph McCarthy in the United States during the Second Red Scare of the early 1950s. The term ‘McCarthyism’ has become a byname for making sweeping, unsubstantiated accusations of disloyalty or subversion. 

Shutdown Continues 

Reuters wrote on October 28: 

“U.S. air travel turmoil deepened as nearly 7,000 flights were delayed nationwide on Monday, with air traffic controller absences surging as the federal government shutdown reached its 27th day… Roughly 13,000 air traffic controllers and 50,000 Transportation Security Administration officers must work without pay… More than 8,800 flights were delayed on Sunday.” 

CBS News reported on October 28:

“The Senate failed to advance a Republican-backed funding bill to end the government shutdown for the 13th time. The final vote was 54 to 45, falling short of the 60 votes needed to move forward… 

“Democrats are under increasing pressure to back down after the largest union representing federal government employees said that ‘it’s time to pass a clean continuing resolution and end this shutdown’ on Monday. Federal employees missed their first full paycheck at the end of last week, and upcoming paychecks, including for the military, could be in jeopardy. 

“The Department of Agriculture has warned that ‘the well has run dry’ for SNAP (“Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program”), and federal food aid will not go out on Nov. 1. Forty-two million Americans rely on the program to help buy food.” 

Disappointed in Putin 

The U.S. Sun wrote on October 26: 

“DONALD Trump is ‘disappointed’ in Vladimir Putin and has ruled out meeting the tyrant until he stops ‘wasting his time’… It comes after a turbulent week has pushed back any hopes of ending the bloodshed in Ukraine. 

“Trump slapped punishing sanctions on two Russian oil companies on Wednesday… US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the companies are responsible for ‘funding the Kremlin‘s war machine’… 

“US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov held a phone call… to iron out details ahead of the [planned] meeting [between Trump and Putin in Hungary]. But hours after Rubio put the phone down, any idea of a meeting was suddenly axed. One source familiar with the matter believes Rubio and Lavrov had widely differing expectations about how to end Russia’s invasion during their call. This prompted Rubio to speak to US officials about his concerns as it was later announced that Trump wouldn’t be speaking to Putin anytime soon…” 

Far from being a “productive” phone call between Rubio and Lavrov, the phone call apparently established that no peace deal was in the making. 

Nuclear Flying Chernobyl 

The U.S. Sun wrote on October 26: 

“VLADIMIR Putin claims Russia has test-launched a new nuclear-powered missile dubbed the ‘Flying Chernobyl’ – and has vowed it will soon be ready for war. 

“The Russian president said his menacing 9M730 Burevestnik missile – assigned the codename ‘Skyfall’ by Nato – was a ‘weapon of unlimited range powered by a nuclear engine’… Putin also boasted his new weapon was ‘invincible’ in the face of current and future missile defence systems…. He said: ‘It is a truly unique system – one that no other country in the world possesses’… 

“… the Burevestnik missile is about 12 metres long and carries a thermonuclear warhead

“The nuclear energy core in theory could let it fly around the world several times before hitting its target… It can also follow a flat flight path at extremely low altitudes, making it ‘invisible’ as it flies below the range of most missile detection systems.” 

Norway Alarmed 

“Putin is amassing nuclear weapons and attack submarines in the Arctic Circle as his country prepares for war with NATO, Norway has said.  Norway’s Defence Minister Tore Sandvik claimed his country had found Russia had been increasing its military presence in the Arctic, particularly in the Kola peninsula.  

“The politician also said Vladimir Putin had been attempting to take over the Arctic region where its fleet is based to block shipping routes to Nato allies if war broke out… ‘They [the nuclear weapons] are not only pointed towards Norway, but towards the UK and over the pole towards Canada and the US. 

“Although the Kremlin may be struggling in the Ukraine war, its nuclear warheads and ‘second-strike’ capacity allow it to maintain its superpower status… the Russian fleet include[s] at least 16 nuclear-powered submarines and the advanced Tsirkon hypersonic missile – capable of traveling at speeds up to eight times the speed of sound…. ‘Even if we have a peace deal in Ukraine, with boots on the ground and a stable situation, one analysis is that he will mobilise millions of soldiers up close to the border with Finland.‘” 

Russia will not use those and other nuclear weapons against the USA or Canada, but against a united Europe. Note the next articles. 

Europe Ready by 2030?

Politico wrote on October 15: 

“By 2030, Europe needs a sufficiently strong European defence posture to credibly deter its adversaries, as well as respond to any aggressions,’ says the draft plan [of the European Commission]… 

“The Defence Readiness Roadmap 2030 is a sign of the EU’s growing role in military affairs, a reaction to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s war on Ukraine and U.S. President Donald Trump’s unclear commitment to European security… 

“While EU countries are rapidly increasing their defense budgets, much of that spending ‘remains overwhelmingly national, leading to fragmentation, cost-inflation and lack of 
interoperability,’ says the 16-page document. The EU executive body is pushing capitals to buy weapons together and wants at least 40 percent of defense procurement to be joint contracts by the end of 2027 — up from less than a fifth now…”

Politico added on October 22: 

“Top generals and politicians from EU and NATO countries have warned that Moscow could attack the alliance in the coming years, with timelines varying from 2027 to 2030.”  

On October 23, the European Council “threw its weight behind a new plan to grow Europe’s defense by 2030 (Breaking Defense, October 23). 

aa.com.tr added on October 24: 

“The EU leaders have agreed to accelerate plans to strengthen Europe’s defense and security, setting a clear goal to ramp up readiness by 2030 in response to growing threats to its security… 

“The European Council also condemned recent ‘violations of the airspace of several Member States’ and stressed the need to defend ‘all EU land, air and maritime borders,’ with particular attention to threats on the eastern flank.” 

Berlin Inevitably Becomes the EU’s Dominant Military Power 

Politico wrote on October 1: 

“An age-old French nightmare — that of growing German military might — is resurfacing in a new form… French President Emmanuel Macron… fears an invasion — not of French territory, but of his country’s preeminent position as the EU’s most effective military-diplomatic power…

“In theory, both countries are bound by NATO members’ new pledge to spend 3.5 percent of GDP on defense by 2035. But while Germany has a credible plan to reach that target by 2029…, France has no obvious way to both honor its NATO commitment and cut its budget deficit to 3 percent of GDP in four years… By 2029…, Germany expects to be spending €150 billion a year; while France, even with its newly expanded defense plans, will be spending €80 billion at best… 

“Will the German military build-up help forge a more strategically autonomous European defense industry, create European jobs and strengthen European economic power?…  the sheer scale of Berlin’s spending in the years ahead will inevitably make its defense industry the key player in European military innovation and procurement… the truth is, there can never be a solid European military-industrial base unless EU countries come together to develop the weapons of the future. 

“It is, therefore, vital that Berlin and Paris immediately establish a pattern for the upcoming boom years, and double down on their political commitment to Franco-German cooperation in defense innovation, training and procurement… France will be looking at the decade ahead anxiously, as Germany will retain its status as Europe’s industrial powerhouse, as well as become — just by sheer size — the dominant military power within the EU. 

“The uncomfortable truth for France is that when it comes to the creation of a European defense industry, and even the potential rapid increase of France’s own military capacity, strategic autonomy is now in Germany’s hands…” 

Also, Volkswagen is exploring a move into the defense industry by 2026, potentially through a partnership with Rheinmetall, to utilize idle production capacity like the Osnabrück plant, which is scheduled to cease production in 2026. This potential transition is driven by declining automotive sales and Europe’s increased military spending, and the company’s CEO has expressed openness to the idea, noting VW’s past experience with military production. The famous Volkswagen bug (“Kaefer”) was famously called Hitler’s “car for the people” or “People’s Car” (“Wagen fuers Volk”). 

The Sinister Power of Reporting Portals

Bild Online wrote on October 27:

“Four police officers rang the doorbell of author [of Die Welt magazine] Norbert Bolz on Thursday because of a satirical tweet: house search! It later emerged that the state-run portal ‘HessenGegenHetze’ (Hesse Against Hate) had forwarded the post to the authorities, thus setting the whole case in motion… A BILD investigation revealed that there are more than 50 such state-run reporting centers in the country. In addition, there are dozens of private portals. These centers cover, among other things, anti-Muslim, anti-Black, and anti-Asian racism, queerphobia, antisemitism, and extremism. Most federal states operate their own reporting centers; some are direct partners of the Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA).

“Anyone who finds such content online can report it anonymously to the portals with just a few clicks. Staff there (including political and social scientists) evaluate the posts. Anything they deem inappropriate is forwarded to the Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA). But that doesn’t necessarily mean it’s actually criminally relevant. A mere feeling of unease is enough to start with…

“The criticism of internet surveillance is therefore massive. The accusation: The state is engaging in opinion control and deliberately intimidating critical voices. Furthermore, the terms ‘hate speech’ and ‘incitement to hatred’ are not found in the law. Legally, it is unclear what they are supposed to mean…

“State governments recently supported these portals with several million euros. Rhineland-Palatinate, for example, subsidized the reporting and documentation center for hate speech incidents with €188,000. ‘HessenGegenHetze’ received €1.18 million from Hesse’s Ministry of the Interior in 2024.”

Sounds just like methods used in the Third Reich or the former GDR.

Bild Online published the following commentary on October 24:

“‘The home is inviolable,’ states the Basic Law (Article 13). On Thursday, this fundamental right was violated: Four police officers entered the apartment of Berlin professor Norbert Bolz… According to the Basic Law, such an intrusion into a home is only permitted ‘in cases of imminent danger’ or with the authorization of a judge. A Berlin magistrate had authorized the search – that’s the problem…

“…three authorities had previously failed: The state reporting agency ‘HessenGegenHetze’ reported the professor to the Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA), even though the accusation was clearly unfounded. The BKA forwarded the report to the public prosecutor, who applied for the search warrant. Now the judge [Magistrate Dr. Fricke] should have put a stop to it. He didn’t…

“One might want to laugh about it, but it’s not funny. In Bolz’s case, the instruments meant to protect citizens from the state have failed. That is very disturbing.”

And this is by no means the first time in Germany that the state has been guilty of unlawful and arbitrary measures against German citizens. This seems to be gradually becoming routine.

In another comment from October 24th, Bild says:

“The Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA), the public prosecutor’s office, and the local court have made themselves ridiculous, or they acted in a politically motivated manner, which they are not allowed to do.”

Will the BKA, the public prosecutor’s office, and the local court therefore be held accountable? The answer should be clear. 

The Public Prosecutor’s Office Investigates Reichelt for Incitement to Hatred

TAZ wrote on October 27:

“The Berlin public prosecutor’s office is investigating Julian Reichelt, editor-in-chief of the news portal ‘Nius,’ on suspicion of incitement to hatred. The investigation concerns a post on the platform X from April 1…

“In it, Reichelt claimed that Germany would experience ‘first the infiltration and then the takeover of our police force’ by officers with a migration background in the coming years. Die Welt (Monday) was the first to report on this.

“Reichelt continued in the post: ‘In ten years, the police in our cities will be dominated by Arabs. Have fun!’ The former editor-in-chief of Bild was referring to a report in the tabloid newspaper, according to which two federal police officers named Ahmet K. and Hakan A. were allegedly involved in drug trafficking.

“In response to an inquiry from Welt, Reichelt explained his post: ‘That’s exactly my opinion. As a journalist who closely follows news about organized crime and also conducts my own research, for example by speaking with police officers as well as prominent members of large families, I am absolutely convinced that this is precisely what will happen.’

“Reichelt also referred to a ZDF documentary that reported on the infiltration of the police by criminal clans.”

The Rheinische Post added on October 27:

“Nius is a German-language online media outlet founded in 2022, which is classified as a right-wing populist portal in the style of Fox News.”

Seriously? Unbelievable conditions in Germany! 

Trade Controversy Between USA and Canada 

The New York Post wrote on October 25: 

“President Donald Trump escalated his trade war with Canada Saturday, announcing a 10% hike on tariffs after blasting Ontario’s anti-tariff ad campaign as ‘fraudulent’ and accusing the US neighbor of misusing Ronald Reagan’s legacy. Canada had been ‘caught, red handed’ using ‘selective audio and video’ of Reagan’s 1987 radio address in an ad opposing tariffs, the president wrote on Truth Social, claiming the move was designed to sway an upcoming US Supreme Court case on his authority to issue the levies

“‘Because of their serious misrepresentation of the facts, and hostile act, I am increasing the Tariff on Canada by 10% over and above what they are paying now,’ Trump wrote on Truth Social…

“The ads — which use clips of Reagan warning that tariffs ‘hurt’ Americans — triggered Trump on Thursday to terminate trade negotiations with Canada… 

“The Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute said the Ontario government ‘did not seek nor receive permission’ to use Reagan’s remarks and was ‘reviewing its legal options.’ The foundation accused the province of misrepresenting Reagan’s speech, bolstering Trump’s claims that the ad was deceptive… 

“The new increase announced on Saturday widens that penalty further, raising fears of another full-blown trade war between the two allies….” 

Trump and the Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute are clearly misrepresenting what Reagan said in his address. He made clear that tariffs hurt the American people, but he imposed tariffs on Japan as they had violated a trade agreement and were engaging in unfair trade practices. Overall, his speech was clearly against imposing tariffs. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5t5QK03KXPc 

Trump-Xi-TikTok Deal 

Daily Mail wrote on October 26: 

“Donald Trump and China’s Xi Jinping have finalized a deal to transfer TikTok to new owners after a years-long struggle… 

“Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CBS News’s Face The Nation that the two world leaders will ‘consummate’ the deal when they meet in Korea on Thursday. ‘All the details are ironed out,’ Bessent said as he delivered the news on Sunday. 

“This marks a historic end to the power struggle over the app – which has quickly become one the world’s most popular social media platforms.” 

Kennedy on Saturated Fats 

The Guardian wrote on October 25: 

“Robert F Kennedy Jr., the health and human services (HHS) secretary, is planning to issue guidance encouraging Americans to eat more saturated fats… Kennedy has indicated that new dietary guidelines will ‘stress the need to eat saturated fats of dairy, of good meat, of fresh meat and vegetables … When we release those, it will give everybody the rationale for driving it into our schools,’ according to recent reporting in the Hill… 

“… research shows that ‘saturated fat is relatively neutral’ compared with what scientists have believed in the past… reducing saturated fat intake is only beneficial if you replace it with the right things… replacing saturated fats with sugars and carbohydrates can actually increase heart disease risk.” 

Thailand’s Queen Mother Dead 

Reuters wrote on October 25: 

“Thailand’s Queen Mother Sirikit… has died aged 93, the Thai Royal Household Bureau said on Saturday. The palace said she had been hospitalised since 2019 due to several illnesses and developed a bloodstream infection on October 17 before passing away late on Friday. A mourning period of one year has been declared for members of the royal family and household. The government said public offices would fly flags at half-mast for a month and asked government officials to observe mourning for one year… 

“Sirikit’s husband, King Bhumibol Adulyadej, was Thailand’s longest-reigning monarch, with 70 years on the throne since 1946. She was at his side for much of that, winning over hearts at home with their charity work… 

“For more than four decades, she frequently travelled with the king to remote Thai villages, promoting development projects for the rural poor… Her only son, now King Maha Vajiralongkorn, also known as Rama X, succeeded Bhumibol after his death in 2016 and upon his coronation in 2019, Sirikit’s formal title became the Queen Mother… Sirikit is survived by her son, the king, as well as three daughters.” 

The Daily Mail added on October 26: 

“Her body will now lie in state at the seat of the Thai royalty for one year before she is cremated… The royal family is venerated in Thailand, treated by many as semi-divine figures and lavished with glowing media coverage and portraits hanging in public and in private homes…” 

Herbert W. Armstrong (who died in January of 1986), the late leader of the now defunct Worldwide Church of God and President of Ambassador College and the Ambassador Foundation, had an especially good relationship with Queen Sirikit. We are quoting below an article of the Los Angeles Times from March 22, 1985: 

“There was a royal welcome awaiting Thailand’s Queen Sirikit when she arrived… at Pasadena’s Ambassador College on Wednesday night. There was Herbert W. Armstrong, the white-haired patriarch of the Ambassador Foundation and the college, to escort her into Ambassador Auditorium and later the mayor of Los Angeles, Tom Bradley, and Pasadena Mayor William J. Bogaard greeted her with gifts…

“The party for the queen was small (about 130) and select… The party moved to the auditorium for the receiving line where Queen Sirikit stood with Armstrong, the Ambassador Foundation’s Ellis La Ravia… and his wife and a few other foundation representatives… 

“Dinner was served in the auditorium’s lounge… Armstrong spoke of his admiration and long friendship with Thailand’s King Bhumibol and Queen Sirikit and their country. And then the queen, in soft accented English made a graceful toast to Armstrong. Among those raising their glasses were Mrs. Robert Finch with Mrs. Kenneth Schechter, Mrs. George Fritzinger with Eunice Forester, Diane and Guilford Glazer, Atty. Gen. and Mrs. John Van de Kamp, Mrs. H. J. Van de Kamp (the attorney general’s mother) with Milo Bixby, Mrs. Bhirapongse Kasemsri, wife of the Thai ambassador to the United Nations, and David Hulme, who is with Ambassador Foundation, and his Australian-born wife…” 

Acknowledgement and Disclaimer: 

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

This Week in the News

Need for a Third Temple 

Israel 365 News wrote on October 15:

“President Donald Trump’s speech at the Knesset last week marked a significant and monumental moment for Israel, one that celebrated the remarkable deal that freed all the live hostages as a first step, something that Hamas never agreed to in past deals… 

“There’s no denying the scale of this accomplishment. Trump’s vision of a Middle East where Israel stands as a pillar of strength and a key partner to the United States—and to the wider world—is truly inspiring… Yet, as grand as the speech was…, it still misses one crucial, undeniable truth: it won’t bring peace… 

“The reality is that a mere pause in hostilities does not equate to peace… it doesn’t directly address the fundamental issue that has plagued this region for over a millennium: the ideological and religious jihadist agenda that calls for the obliteration of Israel and the Islamic takeover of the world… 

“If Trump and Netanyahu truly wanted to establish a lasting peace in the Middle East, their plan… would have focused on something even more transformative and spiritually resonant: the expansion of Israel to encompass its rightful Biblical borders, protect all the minorities in the region also persecuted by jihadi Islam, and the one, powerful act of rebuilding the Third Temple in Jerusalem… What message would it send to the Muslim world if, as part of a peace plan, Trump and Netanyahu announced a plan to not only expand Israel’s borders, but to restore the holiest site in Judaism, the Third Temple?… 

“A rebuilt Temple in Jerusalem would be a clear signal to the Muslim world that the Jews are back in full force, not just as a temporary fixture or a historical relic, but as a powerful, sovereign nation reclaiming its rightful place on the world stage… Such a monumental step would have made it clear that Israel’s commitment to peace isn’t simply about appeasing its enemies or military victories, but about sending a clear message that the Jewish people are not going anywhere…” 

The Third Temple will be built prior to Christ’s Return, but paradoxically, it will not bring peace to the region, but more war. 

Far From Over 

The Sun wrote on October 15: 

“Donald Trump has warned Hamas that he will respond ‘violently’ if they refuse to disarm themselves as part of the Gaza peace deal. Israel’s truce with the terror group has been rocked by multiple setbacks today… Under the terms of Trump’s 20-point plan, Hamas must give up all of their weapons to squash Israel’s fears of the group restrengthening… Officials within Hamas over recent days have said they have no plans of disarming regardless of Trump or Israel’s pleas… 

“Hamas claims it has been unable to locate up to 15 corpses lost in the chaos of the Gaza War – but families believe the terror group is holding on to their loved ones’ remains… 

“Meanwhile, Hamas said it had recalled 7,000 members of its security forces in order to ‘cleanse Gaza of outlaws and collaborators’ – sparking fears of a bloody civil war. Bone-chilling videos have emerged of Hamas executing prisoners it accused of collaborating with Israel…” 

In exchange, nearly 2,000 Palestinian prisoners were freed—many of them convicted criminals and terrorists. During the last exchange, a convicted terrorist was freed who later became one of the masterminds for the October 7 attack on Israel [the later Hamas-Chief Yahya Sinwar (†2024)]. Trump’s deals may look good on paper… but many times, they don’t work in practice.

The Future of Hamas 

Deutsche Welle wrote on October 16: 

“Hamas… is classified as a terrorist organization by Germany, the US and several other countries… It still commands some 40,000 fighters, according to Israeli daily Haaretz, who can now be seen reappearing on the streets and squares of Gaza… 

“The group should be completely disarmed, according to US President Donald Trump’s peace plan; however, this does not look likely for now.

“Trump has made contradictory statements about the group’s disarmament. Addressing the Israeli parliament on Monday, Trump proclaimed that ‘virtually the entire region has endorsed the plan that Gaza will be immediately demilitarized, that Hamas will be disarmed and Israel’s security will no longer be threatened in any way, shape or form.’ 

“Yet before his speech, on the flight to Israel, Trump told reporters his government had allowed Hamas to temporarily rearm itself as it tries to restore order after months of war. Most recently, however, Trump appeared to double down on the group’s disarmament, saying if Hamas did not lay down its weapons, the US would disarm it by force. 

Hamas sent a clear message when its armed operatives showed up in Gaza City shortly after the Israeli withdrawal, said Simon Wolfgang Fuchs, a professor of Islam at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. ‘Hamas is making a point that it has by no means disappeared from the Gaza Strip; on the contrary, it continues to claim a role there,’ he said. 

“Hamas sees its weapons as a means to guarantee its existence — militarily, politically and symbolically, said Simon Engelkes, who heads Ramallah’s branch of the Konrad Adenauer Foundation…’ US President Trump’s “security guarantees” that the war in the Gaza Strip will not be continued due to the ceasefire agreement will not be enough at this stage.’ 

“Even though Hamas’ military structures were severely weakened in the war, its networks and presence in Gaza have remained intact, said Engelkes… French President Emmanuel Macron has warned that Hamas still poses a threat… The real conflict still lies ahead, said Engelkes…” 

This whole “deal” with Hamas—an organization with terrorists and mass murderers—is shameful, shortsighted and futile at the same time. Victory celebrations for “Peace in the Middle East” are nothing more than a pipe dream. Note the next article. 

Making Peace With Hitler? 

Israel Today wrote on October 10: 

“While [Police Minister Itamar] Ben-Gvir is like all Israelis happy for the opportunity to recover the hostages being held in Gaza, he believes the deal ultimately serves to set the stage for the next catastrophe and war. According to Hebrew media, a heated exchange erupted between Ben-Gvir and the Americans. 

“Ben-Gvir: ‘I’m standing here next to the list of terrorists being released – baby killers, rapists. Gentlemen, you would never release them in the United States. You spoke about making peace. You can’t make peace with Hamas! They want to kill us… Those who killed us on October 7 do not ask for forgiveness. Their families are proud of it. They want to murder Jews… Would you have made peace with Hitler? Hamas is Hitler. They want to kill us.’ 

“Hamas officials have stated a number of times that they will repeat the atrocities of October 7, 2023 if given the opportunity…” 

Ben-Gvir is of course right. The naivety of the Americans [US envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner] is astonishing.

Hamas Unwilling to Disarm

The Jerusalem Post wrote on October 17: 

“Hamas intends to maintain security control in Gaza during an interim period, a senior Hamas official [Nazal] told Reuters, adding he could not commit to the group disarming – positions that reflect the difficulties for Trump’s plan for Gaza… 

“… the [Israeli] Prime Minister’s Office said…: ‘Hamas is supposed to release all hostages in stage 1. It has not. Hamas knows where the bodies of our hostages are. [Hamas has still not turned over all of the 28 dead bodies.] Hamas are to be disarmed under this agreement. No ifs, no buts. They have not. Hamas need to adhere to the 20-point plan. They are running out of time…’ 

“Nazzal said there was an understanding regarding Hamas’ presence on the ground, without specifying among whom, indicating it was necessary to protect aid trucks from thieves and armed gangs… 

“Hamas’ founding charter called for the destruction of Israel, although the group’s leaders have at times offered a long-term truce with Israel in return for a viable Palestinian state on all Palestinian territory occupied by Israel in the 1967 war…” 

This “peace deal” will go nowhere. In fact, credible reports are surfacing regarding another coming Hamas massacre—this time against Palestinian civilians. 

Not With Turkey… 

JNS wrote on October 21: 

“Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan is a ‘sworn enemy of Israel and the West, a jihadist in a suit,’ Amichai Chikli, the Jewish state’s minister of diaspora affairs and combating antisemitism, charged on Monday. The Jewish state ‘will not tolerate a Turkish presence’ on its southern border with the Gaza Strip or northern frontier with Syria, Chikli tweeted, slamming Ankara’s potential involvement in U.S. President Donald Trump’s recently-launched peace plan for the Middle East… 

“Under the plan, Turkey has committed to deploying search and rescue teams to Gaza to help recover the bodies of slain hostages and clear up the rubble. Ankara is also expected to join a multinational task force overseeing the ceasefire and assisting in the training of local forces. However,… Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has ruled out Turkey’s participation in the International Stabilization Force, defining it as Israel’s ‘red line.’ Netanyahu has reportedly also communicated reservations about Turkish companies participating in the reconstruction of the Strip…” 

Qatar vs. Israel 

Y-Net News wrote on October 10: 

“Qatar’s Emir Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani condemned ‘Israeli violations in Palestine, especially turning the Gaza Strip into an uninhabitable area.’ According to him, ‘It’s time to end the Israeli occupation. The Palestinian issue is not a terrorism issue, but one of prolonged occupation. It’s time to end it. This is the basis for just peace. What happened in the Gaza Strip in the last two years is genocide.’” 

And Turkey and Qatar—America’s “allies”—are supposed to help end the war? What lunacy! 

Gaza Descends Into Anarchy 

The Daily Mail wrote on October 21: 

“Donald Trump today promised to unleash death upon Hamas if the militants do not uphold their peace agreement with Israel. The Gaza region has descended into anarchy as new footage has emerged showing Palestinians being executed and tortured by Hamas enforcers…

“The first phase of the ceasefire with Hamas and Israel is still ongoing despite Hamas not handing over the remaining bodies of the 15 deceased hostages… The next phase of Trump’s peace plan is for the disarmament of Hamas along with the group losing control of governing Gaza. Hamas has not agreed to this part of the peace deal.” 

Trump’s “War” with Venezuela 

The Associated Press wrote on October 15: 

“President Donald Trump confirmed on Wednesday that he has authorized the CIA to conduct covert operations inside Venezuela and said he was weighing carrying out land operations on the country. The acknowledgement of covert action in Venezuela by the U.S. spy agency comes after the U.S. military in recent weeks has carried out a series of deadly strikes against alleged drug-smuggling boats in the Caribbean. U.S. forces have destroyed at least five boats since early September, killing 27 people, and four of those vessels originated from Venezuela… [As of Wednesday, 8 boats were destroyed.] 

“Early this month, the Trump administration declared drug cartels to be unlawful combatants and pronounced the United States is now in an ‘armed conflict’ with them, justifying the military action as a necessary escalation to stem the flow of drugs into the United States. The move has spurred anger in Congress from members of both major political parties that Trump was effectively committing an act of war without seeking congressional authorization

“The Trump administration has yet to provide underlying evidence to lawmakers proving that the boats targeted by the U.S. military were in fact carrying narcotics…”

Trump’s actions—carried out and contemplated—seem to be illegal and unconstitutional.

ICE Misconduct

The Mirror wrote on October 15:

“Shocking video taken during an ICE sweep at a Chicago Walgreens shows a senior white officer throwing a Black man to the pavement and placing him under arrest for ‘fleeing,’ even though a relative insisted he was an American citizen…  A second video captured the shocking moment after ICE officers cuffed the man and drove him away in SUVs… 

“It comes after an out-of-control ICE agent yelled a disgusting insult before shooting a woman five times.” 

The Rutherford Institute wrote on October 15: 

“Masked gunmen. Tasers. Tear gas. Pepper spray. Unmarked vehicles. Intimidation tactics. Brutality. Racial profiling. Children traumatized. Families terrorized. Journalists targeted. Citizens detained. Disabled individuals, minors, the elderly, pregnant women, military veterans—snatched off the streets. Private property destroyed. This is not a war zone. 

“This is what now passes for law-and-order policing by ICE agents in Trump’s America—and it is not making America safer or greater. What began as an agency tasked with enforcing immigration law has metastasized into a domestic terror force

“From coast to coast, ICE goon squads… are prowling neighborhoods, churches, courthouses, hospitals, bus stops, and worksites, anywhere ‘suspected’ migrants might be present, snatching people first and asking questions later. Sometimes ‘later’ comes hours, days or even weeks afterwards. No one is off limits—not even American citizens… It is how a dictatorship behaves when it decides the rule of law—in this case, the Bill of Rights—is optional.

“Journalists are being shoved to the pavement, forced into chokeholds, teargassed, and brutalized—in violation of the First Amendment. U.S. citizens, including toddlers, are being snatched up and carted off—in violation of the Fourth Amendment. People with no criminal records who have lived, worked and paid taxes in this country for decades are being made to disappear—in violation of habeas corpus…

“Nationally, more than 70% of individuals rounded up by ICE nationally have no criminal convictions. Many have lived in the U.S. for decades, raised families, paid taxes, contributed to the economy, and worked the jobs most Americans refuse to do.” 

Even Trump admitted that. Americans did not vote for him to have ICE behave in this illegal way. He may pay dearly at the midterm elections. 

“Pope Leo’s Critique of Trump Administration” 

Reuters wrote on October 2: 

“Pope Leo initially impressed conservative Catholics after his election in May as he embraced traditions shunned by his predecessor Pope Francis and steered clear of hot button social issues that divided the 1.4 billion-member Church. But his honeymoon with conservatives appears over after he unexpectedly took aim at U.S. President Donald Trump’s hardline immigration policies, questioning whether they were in line with the Church’s pro-life teachings. 

“‘Someone who says I am against abortion but I am in agreement with the inhuman treatment of immigrants in the United States, I don’t know if that’s pro-life,’ Leo, the first U.S. pope, told reporters on Tuesday… 

“The Trump administration, which was sharply critical of Francis but has rarely commented about Leo… pushed back. Press secretary Karoline Leavitt said she rejected the characterisation of inhumane treatment of immigrants.” 

Pope Leo is correct. The Trump administration’s denial is laughable. Note the next article. 

The New Republic wrote on October 1: 

On Tuesday evening, the Chicago-born Pope Leo XIV spoke out against anti-immigrant sentiment in the United States, as well as Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s bellicose rhetoric. At an unusual gathering of military leaders earlier that day, Hegseth had told the top brass to be ‘prepared for war, not for defense,’ while espousing the use of ‘overwhelming and punishing violence on the enemy’ and promising to ‘untie the hands of our warfighters to intimidate, demoralize, hunt and kill the enemies of our country.’… 

“Leo called Hegseth’s rhetoric ‘worrying… because it shows each time an increase in tensions.’ Citing Hegseth’s change in job title from ‘secretary of defense’ to ‘secretary of war,’ the pope said, ‘Let’s hope it is only a way of speaking.’” 

Reuters wrote on October 1: 

“Trump said he told [U.S. Defense Secretary Pete] Hegseth ‘we should use some of these dangerous [U.S.] cities as training grounds for our military.’ He acknowledged that he has been criticized for deploying the military on U.S. streets, but said America was in the grips of what he described as a war from within waged by immigrants in the country illegally who his administration is seeking to deport. 

“‘America is under invasion from within. We’re under invasion from within, no different than a foreign enemy, but more difficult in many ways, because they don’t wear uniforms,’ Trump said. That triggered a sharp reaction from Illinois Governor JB Pritzker, a Democrat. ‘Anyone who talks about their fellow Americans as enemies to be “taken out” is not fit to lead the nation,’ Pritzker said on X.” 

The terminology of the Trump Administration becomes more and more intolerable. Words lead to deeds. Is civil war coming?  

Double-Tongued Stephen Miller

The Independent wrote on October 1:

“Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff, has responded angrily to the Governor of California, Gavin Newsom, after a social media account linked to Newsom labelled Miller a ‘fascist’… ‘It is a message that his team is sending to all the crazies and lunatics out there,’ he said. ‘We’re not going to absolve Democrats of responsibility anymore. There’s a reason why all of these killers and lunatics and terrorists adopt the same language. They say they are trying to kill the fascist and stop the fascists. This is deliberate.’… 

Miller himself has previously described opponents, including the Democrats and the Biden administration, as ‘fascists’ in numerous social media posts. ‘The Democrat Party is now a Fascist Party. Using corporate and government power to punish dissent and dissenters,’ he wrote in 2024… 

“His use of the slur is not reserved for the Democratic Party…”

Miller is a dangerous political force. 

Circumcision and Autism 

CBS News wrote on October 14: 

“Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. suggested there may be a link between autism and circumcision while reasserting the… theory that Tylenol causes the disorder… ‘There’s two studies that show children who are circumcised early have double the rate of autism. It’s highly likely because they are given Tylenol,’ Kennedy stated during a Cabinet meeting on Thursday…

“Kennedy said he was referring to an August 2025 Preprints.org review by Patel et al., which he said ‘directly validates my point that the observed autism correlation in circumcised boys is best explained by acetaminophen exposure, not circumcision itself.’” 

This important distinction has been conveniently overlooked in the mass media.

Zelensky to Leave Office? 

Breitbart wrote on October 14: 

“A poll published by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology (KIIS) on Monday found that 75 percent of Ukrainians want President Volodymyr Zelensky to leave office after the war with Russia ends…”

Zelensky himself declared that he would step down after the war ends. It reminds us of Churchill’s fate after World War II. 

Is Putin Playing Trump Again? 

The Spectator wrote on October 17: 

“Sorry, Volodymyr. There won’t be any Tomahawk missiles headed to Ukraine now that president Vladimir Putin of Russia has talked on the phone with president Donald Trump, who called their session ‘very productive.’ What it will produce remains an open question. But it does seem to have resulted in a decision to hold an upcoming summit in Budapest. The bottom line: Putin has outflanked Ukrainian president Zelensky… 

“For Zelensky, Putin’s missive could not come at a worse time… Trump has repeatedly voiced his frustration with ‘Vladimir,’ as he likes to call him, for refusing to end the war. Now Putin is once more dangling the bait of a ceasefire… 

“Since the Alaska summit, Trump has approved further cooperation between American and Ukrainian intelligence services, ensuring that they receive better targeting information to hit Russian energy infrastructure…

“Putin’s track record, of course, should hardly inspire much confidence. A master of the tactical move, the Russian president may well have intervened simply to stymie Trump from delivering more potent weapons to Ukraine… It is Putin, and Putin alone, who has steadily been saying nyet to ending the conflict in his mad desire to reestablish the Russian empire of yore.” 

Nothing good will come from these “negotiations.” Note the next article. 

Trump’s Ever-Changing Positions 

The Guardian wrote on October 17: 

“Donald Trump seemed more intent on brokering a peace deal than he was to supply Ukraine with Tomahawk cruise missiles during a White House meeting with Volodymyr Zelenskyy, saying that the US may need them for a future conflict… After speaking with Zelenskyy for more than two hours, Trump implored both Ukraine and Russia to ‘stop the war immediately’, even if it means Ukraine conceding territory… 

“Trump’s doubtful tone on the cruise missiles follows a surprise phone call with Vladimir Putin on Friday during which the Russian leader told Trump that supplying the Tomahawks would damage US-Russian relations

“His position on supplying Ukraine with weapons has changed a number of times since he returned to office in January, often after negotiations with Putin or European backers of Ukraine… On previous occasions, when Trump had seemed ready to tilt towards Kyiv and its European allies, a call from Putin was often followed by a sudden softening in the US leader’s tone towards Moscow. 

“A flurry of activity was also set off with Trump’s announcement after the call that he was planning to meet the Russian president in the Hungarian capital on a date still to be determined, in an effort to end the war… It remains unclear how Putin would travel to Hungary, given EU sanctions and airspace restrictions imposed after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, as well as the fact that he is wanted by the international criminal court (ICC). As a signatory to the ICC, Hungary would be obliged to arrest him, though Orbán has previously said this would not happen… 

“Trump and Putin last met in Alaska in August, which did not produce a diplomatic breakthrough… The latest conversation, which lasted more than two and a half hours, appears to have sapped the momentum Zelenskyy had built with Trump, with the US leader now unlikely to show significant support for Ukraine before meeting Putin… 

“While Moscow has repeatedly claimed it is ready to end its invasion of Ukraine, Putin has shown no indication he is seeking compromise or to scale back his maximalist goal of forcing Kyiv’s capitulation. Despite Trump’s typically  upbeat rhetoric that peace may be within reach, the US vice-president, JD Vance, struck a more cautious note on Thursday, saying that ‘the Russians and the Ukrainians are just not at the point where they can make a deal’, and that a settlement ‘remains possible but will require a lot more work’.” 

Trump is being played like a fiddle… again. He is caving to Putin and is no match for him. 

Putin Demands Donetsk

Euractiv wrote on October 19: 

“Russian President Vladimir Putin demanded that Ukraine surrender full control of Donetsk as a condition for ending the war, US newspaper The Washington Post reported. The request, which would significantly disadvantage Kyiv, signals that Putin has not backed away from long-standing territorial ambitions despite Trump’s optimism about brokering a deal. 

“According to two senior officials quoted by The Washington Post, Putin offered to relinquish claims to parts of Zaporizhzhia and Kherson in exchange for Donetsk [a strategically important region], which Moscow and its proxies have failed to capture entirely since 2014. Trump… has yet to endorse the demand publicly… 

“Zelenskyy on Sunday urged allies against appeasing Russia. ‘Ukraine will never grant terrorists any bounty for their crimes, and we count on our partners to uphold this very position,’ Zelenskyy wrote on social media on his return from Washington. He called for decisive steps from European and American allies. ‘This week alone, Russia has used more than 3,270 attack drones, 1,370 guided aerial bombs, and nearly 50 missiles of various types against Ukraine,’ Zelensky said.” 

Meeting on Hold 

Newsmax wrote on October 21:

“President Donald Trump, confirming Tuesday that his plan for a swift meeting with Russian leader Vladimir Putin was on hold, said that’s because he doesn’t want it to be a ‘waste of time.’ 

“It was the latest twist in Trump’s stop-and-go effort to resolve the war in Ukraine. 

“The decision to hold off on the meeting in Budapest, Hungary, which Trump had announced last week, was made following a call Monday between Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov.” 

While this is going on, in one of the biggest demonstrations in American history, approximately 7 million people demonstrated against Trump over the weekend under the motto: “No Kings.” In a previous “No Kings” demonstration in June, “only” 3 million participated. Note the next segment. 

“No Kings Parade”–Ted Cruz Warns MEGA 

The Daily Beast reported on October 21: 

“Texas Sen. Ted Cruz has implored his party to wake up to the dangers posed by an estimated seven million people turning out in protest against the Donald Trump administration.  ‘Unquestionably, we should take political peril seriously,’ Cruz told Bloomberg Television. ‘… There is a lot of anger on the left. And elections can be dangerous when one side is mobilized, is angry.’… 

“It’s not the first time Cruz has openly criticized the MAGA administration, warning in April 2025 that Trump’s trade war against much of the rest of the planet would likely result in significant job lossesthreatening to turn the 2026 midterms into a ‘bloodbath’ for Republicans.” 

The New York Post added on October 19: 

“The president posted a wild AI-generated video of himself late Saturday as a fighter pilot wearing a crown on his head, unloading sewage on ‘No Kings’ protestors.  With ‘Danger Zone,’ the iconic ‘Top Gun’ theme song, blaring in the background, Trump’s fighter jet was shown dropping masses of manure on demonstrators over what appeared to be New York City.” 

Trump Not Ready to Leave? 

The Mirror wrote on October 22: 

“Donald Trump has no intention of ever leaving the White House… That seems like a weird thing to suggest, but there is now so much evidence pointing to him trying to cling on to power beyond the end of his legal presidential term, that it’s irresponsible to pretend it’s not happening. He keeps saying he’s not a ‘king’ or a ‘dictator’. But he also keeps doing and saying things that suggest he very much would like to be… 

“Trump did exactly what he said he was going to do in his first term, or at least tried to. And this time, he keeps saying he’s going to stay in the White House beyond 2029, when his legal term ends. He’s even made hats and given them out to Republican congressmen. He’s repeatedly floated the idea of re-writing or bypassing constitutional rules that prevent him serving beyond two terms. 

“During a visit to the White House by Volodymyr Zelensky in August, Trump indicated he likes the idea of using a war to cancel the next election, allowing him to stay in power beyond his term limit. Zelensky cancelled an election in Ukraine because his country is at war with Russia. ‘So let me just say three and a half years from now – so you mean, if we happen to be in a war with somebody, no more elections?…’ Trump said. Later during his visit, Trump showed Zelensky the White House gift shop, where Trump 2028 hats are on sale….” 

The article lists several additional factors, but the ones quoted herein are the most striking. 

Turkey Becoming Important to Europe 

fakti.bg wrote on October 15: 

“Currently, the partnership with the country that has the second largest army in NATO after the US may prove to be key for Europe… 

“At the same time, Turkey remains a difficult partner for the West. The conflicts with Greece and Cyprus are still unresolved, and its proximity to Vladimir Putin is causing concern. The country also has serious problems with democracy, and EU accession talks have been frozen for years. But despite the repression of the opposition, criticism from Brussels is almost non-existent. Why?.. 

“Before, it was about democracy. Today, security is the priority. The threat from Russia overshadows everything else… The partnership with Turkey remains risky, but the fear of Russia in Europe is growing…” 

Turkey, with the help of Europe, will play a violent anti-Israeli role in the future. 

Turkey’s Persecution of Minority Christians

IFN wrote on October 16: 

“The Turkish government is increasingly treating Christian minorities as existential threats—branding them as ‘national security dangers’ to justify mass expulsions and heavy restrictions on religious freedom. This alarming rhetoric marks a new low in Türkiye’s crackdown on minority believers.

“… the government has expelled foreign Christians working as missionaries or aid workers—even when they held valid visas. Some local Christians report threats, intimidation, and bureaucratic harassment until they leave… 

“In response, Christian and human rights advocates are calling on governments and international bodies to shine a light on Türkiye’s actions, impose accountability for violations, and support Christians facing forced removal or persecution…” 

Europe, more and more dependent on Turkey’s strong military, stays silent. 

Most Dangerous Time 

The Guardian wrote on October 1: 

“Danish prime minister Mette Frederiksen issued a stark warning that Europe is ‘in the most difficult and dangerous situation since the second world war,’ even worse than during the cold war… as she urged leaders to leave national perspectives behind and unite to take on Russia…” 

And so, at least ten European nations or groups of nations will unite… with dangerous consequences. 

No More Reliance on USA

Euronews wrote on September 29: 

“For decades, Germany relied on the US for its security policy. But that era is over, experts tell Euronews. Germany plans to spend up to €83 billion on European-made weapons and reduce dependence on US defence systems as Chancellor Friedrich Merz pushes to build Europe’s ‘strongest conventional armed force’ amid doubts about Washington’s reliability under Donald Trump

“According to reports, the German government plans 154 major defence procurements between September 2025 and December 2026, with only 8% from US suppliers compared to the previously heavy reliance on US systems. The shift follows US President Trump’s demands that NATO partners increase their defence spending to 5% of GDP, while purchasing more US weapons, prompting Berlin to pursue a ‘Buy European’ strategy… 

“According to US expert and author Dr Josef Braml, this move should not be seen as a mistake of confusing cause and effect. ‘The cause was that Trump made it clear that America can no longer be relied on,’ Braml told Euronews. Now that this has become clear, ‘it no longer makes sense to pay tribute for protection that we no longer get,’ he added. According to Braml, this ‘tribute’ was paid by buying US weapons that made Germany and other European countries dependent on US systems… 

“The Marshall Plan and NATO laid the foundations for security and economic relations between Germany and the US after World War II. Since Trump took office, the German government has endeavoured to maintain bilateral relations. Nevertheless, the German course is running counter to the US president’s expectations… 

“Continuing as before is therefore not an option for Braml. ‘Security is gone, Pax Americana is dead,’ he concluded.” 

Europe will become a mighty military force, independent of the USA. 

AI Assistants Systematically Distort the Truth 

Deutsche Welle wrote on October 22: 

“A major new study by 22 public service media organizations, including DW, has found that four of the most commonly used AI assistants misrepresent news content 45% of the time— regardless of language or territory… Measuring criteria such as accuracy, sourcing, providing context, the ability to editorialize appropriately and the ability to distinguish fact from opinion, the study found that almost half of all answers had at least one significant issue, while 31% contained serious sourcing problems and 20% contained major factual errors… 

“Those behind the study say it confirms that AI assistants systematically distort news content of all kinds. ‘This research conclusively shows that these failings are not isolated incidents,’ said Jean Philip De Tender, deputy director general of the European Broadcasting Union (EBU), which co-ordinated the study. ‘They are systemic, cross-border, and multilingual, and we believe this endangers public trust. When people don’t know what to trust, they end up trusting nothing at all…’” 

Mandatory Military Service by Lottery? 

BBC wrote on October 14: 

“Plans to re-introduce military service in Germany have been thrown into chaos because of an 11th hour row amongst the governing parties. A compromise, which was set to include the possibility of some mandatory conscription, has been shot down… on Tuesday night, a press conference to announce the proposals was abruptly cancelled, ahead of a draft bill going before parliament on Thursday. Defence Minister Boris Pistorius has denied accusations of ‘torpedoing’ the plans… 

“A significant section of German society remains deeply wary of conscription and re-armament given the catastrophic consequences of remilitarising in the 20th Century. Nevertheless, a recent Forsa survey for Stern suggested that 54% of people favoured compulsory service while 41% opposed it. Opposition rose to 63% among 18 to 29-year-olds. Germany wants to expand its armed forces from the current 183,000 active servicemen and women to 260,000 by 2035 – plus 200,000 reservists… 

“There is resistance within the junior partner in the coalition, the SPD, to any element of compulsory service. The government, made up of Merz’s conservative CDU/CSU and the centre-left Social Democrat SPD, agreed in their coalition treaty to reintroduce military service which would be voluntary ‘to start with.’ However, CDU politicians – including Chancellor Merz – have increasingly aired concerns that a purely voluntary system will not be sufficient. 

“This week, negotiators from the two coalition parties hammered out a complicated compromise… reports suggested that, if not enough school-leavers volunteered, then a lottery system could be used. A selection of young men could be summoned for a medical or even mandatory service, if required, should recruitment targets be missed… 

“Rather than a lottery, [Pistorius] has backed proposals for all eligible young men to undergo a medical from July 2027, so the Bundeswehr has a clear snapshot of available manpower…”

Deutsche Welle wrote on October 15: 

“Germany’s Bundestag parliament began its first reading of the contentious bill seeking to reintroduce some form of military service, on a purely voluntary basis at first but with contested plans to add some kind of mandatory component in future if necessary… 

“[Pistorius was] seeking to stress that any decision on obligatory recruitment was not part of the current bill and was a matter for a future debate… ‘that would clearly only take place under the authority of a Bundestag resolution, and using methods that are yet to be decided.’… 

“Politicians from Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s CDU said they stood by their lottery-based ‘Plan B’ for the case that voluntary recruitment falls short of targets or needs… 

“Neither the draft law as it stands nor the lottery proposal is very clear on the contentious question of mandatory recruitment. The draft law mentions the likelihood for the need of ‘comprehensive mustering’ as of 2027, but doesn’t say how it plans to achieve this, and avoids clarifying whether it means mustering in the sense of compulsory conscription, or simply an obligation for young men to muster for inspection and consideration.  

“The lottery proposal, meanwhile, was said to involve drawing lots to make up any shortfall, but then to try to encourage those whose lot was drawn to volunteer, rather than obliging them to act. Again, it didn’t explain how it planned to achieve this… 

“The legal right to oblige young men to serve for a period is enshrined in the constitution, and was only suspended by a simple majority vote in parliament when the system was scrapped. Another simple majority vote would suffice in theory to reactivate the provision as it is. But adding women to the provision, or altering its content, would require a two-thirds majority in the lower and upper houses of parliament instead. The coalition government by itself is nowhere near commanding these majorities, even if it could reach internal agreement on the issue.” 

Mandatory military service by lottery? Most Germans reject this. What boneheaded nonsense! How crazy can it get? 

Acknowledgement and Disclaimer:

These Current Events are compiled and commented on by Norbert Link. We gratefully acknowledge the many contributions of news articles from our readership. The publication of articles in this section is not to be viewed as an endorsement or approval as to contents or accuracy of the selected articles, but they are published for the purpose of pointing at worldwide developments in the light of biblical end-time prophecy and godly instruction. Our own comments are provided in italics.

©2026 Church of the Eternal God
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.